Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:40:24.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tall Poppy Syndrome: Implications for entrepreneurship in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Jodyanne Kirkwood*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract

The Tall Poppy Syndrome (TPS) of knocking high achievers is often described as being ingrained in New Zealand's culture. This study interviews 40 entrepreneurs to explore how TPS impacts on entrepreneurs. Internationally, New Zealand is considered to be a highly entrepreneurial country. Thus TPS and an entrepreneurial culture appear to co-exist. Over half of the participants had experienced TPS in their role as entrepreneurs and their individual strategies for managing its impact included 'staying under the radar', not telling people they owned a business and not ‘flaunting’ their wealth. This study suggests that the effects of TPS may have significant implications for entrepreneurship in New Zealand. Firstly, TPS may discourage entrepreneurs from starting a business. Secondly, people who have experienced a business failure may be reluctant to establish another business because of the public reaction to their 'fall'. Finally, entrepreneurs may deliberately limit business growth because they don't want to attract attention. Potential ways of reducing the impact of TPS on entrepreneurs include celebrating entrepreneurial success more visibly, highlighting realistic role models for people to aspire to and emphasising the hard work and risk that entrepreneurs take to achieve success.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrette, H (1989) The entrepreneur in microeconom-ic theory: Disappearance and explanation, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Belcourt, M (1987) Nothing to lose: Entrepreneurial behaviour of female entrepreneurs, Canadian Journal of Administration Sciences 4(2): 199210.Google Scholar
Bonnett, C and Furnham, A (1991) Who wants to be an entrepreneur? A study of adolescents interested in a Young Enterprise scheme, Journal of Economic Psychology 12: 465478.Google Scholar
Bowden, S (2003) Kiwi international airlines: Judo strategy and its limits, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, Special Edition Management Cases 9(2): 17.Google Scholar
Bowden, S (2003) The Warehouse Group: Entry into Australia, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, Special Edition Management Cases 9(2): 5868.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, RH Snr (1982) The psychology of the entrepreneur In Kent, CA, Sexton, DL and Vesper, KH (Eds) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Buckley, PJ and Chapman, M (1997) The use of native categories in management research, British Journal of Management 8(4): 283300.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA (1992) A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17(1): 2127.Google Scholar
Carson, D, Gilmore, A, Perry, C and Gronhaug, K (2001) Qualitative marketing research, Sage Publications Ltd, London.Google Scholar
CNN (2004) Martha Stewart found guilty on all counts. http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/05/stewart.main/index.html. Accessed 20/1/2006.Google Scholar
Deverson, T (Ed) (1998) The New Zealand Oxford paperback dictionary, Oxford University Press, Auckland.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M, Dennehy, L and Adams, C (2006) Brits want to say goodbye to Blunt, Herald Sun, First ed, London.Google Scholar
Feather, NT (1989) Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the Tall Poppy, Australian Journal of Psychology 41(3): 239267.Google Scholar
Feather, NT (2005) Social psychology in Australia: Past and present, International Journal of Psychology 40(4): 263276.Google Scholar
Feather, NT, Volkmer, RE and McKee, IR (1991) Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect, Australian Journal of Psychology 43(2): 8591.Google Scholar
Fox, A (2006) Hart Attack, Unlimited 87, 1 10 2006, http://www.unlimited.co.nz.Google Scholar
Fox, MA (1998) Motivations and aspirations of self-employed Maori in New Zealand, Working paper, Lincoln University, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Frederick, H and Chittock, G (2006) Global Entrepre-neurship Monitor Aotearoa New Zealand: 2005 Executive Report, Centre for Innovation & Entrepre-neurship Research Report Series, Unitec, Auckland.Google Scholar
Glaser, BG (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
Glaser, BG and Strauss, A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.Google Scholar
Hamilton, RT (1987) Motivations and aspirations of business founders, International Small Business Journal 6(1): 7078.Google Scholar
Harris, S (2000) Reconciling positive and interpretative international management research: A native category approach, International Business Review 9: 755770.Google Scholar
Hebert, RF and Link, AN (1989) In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics 1: 3949.Google Scholar
Hisrich, RD and Brush, CG (1986) The woman entrepreneur: Starting, financing, and managing a successful new business, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hull, DL, Bosley, JJ and Udell, GG (1980) Reviewing the hunt for the heffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics, Journal of Small Business Management 18(1): 1118.Google Scholar
Hull, L (2003) A promotion of enterprise culture theory and practices Ministry of Economic Development working paper.Google Scholar
Janes, A (2005) Selling your culture (sensitively), Unlimited 70, http://www.unlimited.co.nz. 1 04 2005.Google Scholar
Kearins, K, Luke, B and Corner, P (2004) What constitutes successful entrepreneurship? An analysis of recent Australasian awards experiences, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 10(2): 4155.Google Scholar
King, S (2002) Entrepreneur's measure of success: Is it more than profits?, International Council for Small Business, ISCB 2002, San Juan, Pueto Rico.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, J and Ruwhiu, D (2003) Growth at Hub-bards foods?, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, Special Edition Management Cases 9(2): 4757.Google Scholar
Kirwan-Taylor, H (2006) Are you suffering from Tall Poppy Syndrome, Management Today 15.Google Scholar
Korunka, C, Frank, H, Lueger, M and Mugler, J (2003) The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process - a configurational approach, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 26(2): 2342.Google Scholar
Kozan, MK, Oksoy, D and Ozzoy, O (2006) Growth plans of small businesses in Turkey: Individual and environmental influences, Journal of Small Business Management 44(1): 114129.Google Scholar
Krauss, S, Frese, M, Friedrich, C and Unger, J (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 14(3): 315344.Google Scholar
Ljunggren, E and Alsos, G (2001) Media expressions of entrepreneurs: Frequency, content and appearance of male and female entrepreneurs, Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Jonkoping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Lynn, R (1969) An achievement motivation questionnaire, The British Journal of Psychology 60(4): 529534.Google Scholar
Malach-Pines, A, Levy, H, Utasi, A and Hill, TL (2005) Entrepreneurs as cultural heroes: A cross-cultural, interdisciplinary perspective, Journal of Managerial Psychology 20(5/6): 541555.Google Scholar
Massey, C, Lewis, K, Warriner, V, Harris, C, Tweed, D, Cheyne, Jet al. (2006) Exploring firm development in the context of New Zealand SMEs Small Enterprise Research. 14(1): 113.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B (2003) The impact of the entrepreneur's personality on the strategy-formation and planning process in SMEs, Irish Journal of Management 24(1): 154172.Google Scholar
McClelland, DC (1961) The achieving society, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, New Jersey.Google Scholar
McClelland, DC (1962) Business drive and national achievement, Harvard Business Review 4(4): 99112.Google Scholar
McFedries, P (2002) Tall Poppy Syndrome DotCom, IEEE Spectrum 12(12): 68.Google Scholar
Meng, YK, Ashkanasy, N and Hartel, C (2003) The effects of Australian Tall Poppy Attitudes on American value based leadership theory, International Journal of Value-Based Management 16: 5365.Google Scholar
Miller, J (1997) Tall Poppy Syndrome (Canadians have a habit of cutting their female achievers down), Flare 19(4): 102106.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economic Development (2005) SMEs in New Zealand: Structure and dynamics, Ministry of Economic Development, Wellington.Google Scholar
Minniti, M, Bygrave, WD and Autio, E (2005) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2005 executive report, Babson College.Google Scholar
Morris, M, Miyasaki, NN, Watters, C and Coombes, SM (2006) The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs, Journal of Small Business Management 44(2): 221244.Google Scholar
Mouly, VS and Sankaran, J (2001) The Tall Poppy Syndrome in New Zealand: An exploratory investigation. The University of Auckland, Department of Management Science and Information Systems.Google Scholar
Mouly, VS and Sankaran, J (2002) The enactment of envy within organizations, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 38(1): 3656.Google Scholar
Pinfold, JE (2001) The expectations of new business founders: The New Zealand case, Journal of Small Business Management 39(3): 279285.Google Scholar
Reynolds, PD, Bygrave, WD and Autio, E (2003) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2003 executive report, London Business School and Babson College, London.Google Scholar
Richards, L (2000) Using NVivo in qualitative research, QSR International Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Sautet, F (2006) Why have Kiwis not become Tigers? Reforms, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Performance in New Zealand, The Independent Review 10(4): 571595.Google Scholar
See, C (1989) Why Australian writers keep their heads down, The New York Times, Late edition (east coast) ed, New York.Google Scholar
Silverman, D (2000) Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Stainback, S and Stainback, W (1988) Understanding and conducting qualitative research, The Council for Exceptional Children, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
Stewart, WHJ, Carland, JAC and Carland, JW (1996) Empirically defining the entrepreneur, Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship 8(1): 118.Google Scholar
Strauss, A and Corbin, J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage Publications Inc, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
van Eeden, S, Louw, L and Venter, D (2005) Entrepreneurial traits of undergraduate Commerce students: A three-country comparison, Management Dynamics 14(3): 2643.Google Scholar
Vasil, A (2005) Going underground. Metromedia director Paul Manning, ie: Inspiring Entrepreneurs 3(10): 2528Google Scholar
Watson, J, Woodliff, D, Newby, R and McDowell, C (2000) Developing an instrument to examine SME owner-objectives, ICSB World Conference, Brisbane Australia.Google Scholar
Wiklund, J, Davidsson, P and Delmar, F (2003) What do they think and feel about growth? An expectancy-value approach to small business managers' attitudes toward growth, Entrepreneur-ship Theory & Practice 26(2): 247270.Google Scholar
http://www.stuff.co.nz (2006) Trump sues author who questioned his billions. http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3550991a1860,00.html. Accessed 25/1/2006.Google Scholar
Zhao, H and Seibert, SE (2006) The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review, Journal of Applied Psychology 91(2): 259271.Google Scholar