Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:05:40.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Situational stress and restriction of stylistic repertoire in high potential managerial aspirants: Implications for the implementation of the ‘new organization’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Neil McAdam
Neil McAdam*
Affiliation:
Adelaide Graduate School of Business, Adelaide SA, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on new organizational forms commonly stresses the key role of ‘collaborative individuals’ in delivering the challenging balance of creativity and productivity, vision and focus, openness and decisiveness critical to achieving coherence and responsiveness in the turbulent environment of the 21st Century. This paper reports a recent study that considers these requirements as expressed by competing psychological types/brain styles and assesses the impact of stressors within the task environment on the breadth of stylistic repertoire of high-potential managerial aspirants. It finds that stress significantly shrinks stylistic repertoire and, more critically, moves the focus away from creative, collaborative and ambiguity-tolerant styles towards performance-driven, control-oriented, and grounded styles. The implications of this finding for building the strategically coherent but flexible and developmental cultures advocated in the ‘new organization’ literature are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , June 2006 , pp. 40 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allinson, CW, Armstrong, SJ and Hayes, J (2001) The effects of cognitive style on leader-member exchange: A study of member-subordinate dyads, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74: 201–20.Google Scholar
Ansoff, HI (1988) The New Corporate Strategy, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Beach, LR (1993) Four revelations in behavioral decision theory, in Chemers, MM and Ayman, R (Eds), Leadership Theory and Research, pp 271-92, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Bunderson, CV (1989) The validity of the Herrmann brain dominance instrument, in: Herrmann, N (Ed), The Creative Brain, Brain Books, Lake Lure NC.Google Scholar
Campbell, DT and Fiske, DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait- multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.Google Scholar
Champagne, DW and Hogan, RC (1980) The personal style inventory, in Pfeiffer, JW and Jones, JE (Eds), The 1980 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators, University Associates, La Jolla CA.Google Scholar
Charan, R (1991) How networks reshape organizations - for results, Harvard Business Review (10-Oct): 104–15.Google Scholar
Davies, JE (1982) Interpretation Manual: ‘Life-Time’ Analysis Survey, Identity Dimensions, San Diego CA.Google Scholar
Davies, RV (1986) The Margerison–McCann Team Management Index Manual, Ref 15/86, University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Davis, TRV and Luthans, F (1980) A social learning approach to organizational behavior, Academy of Management Review 5(2): 281–290.Google Scholar
Fiedler, FE (1993) The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories, in Chemers, MM and Ayman, R (Eds), Leadership Theory and Research, pp 1–28, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Fiedler, FE and Garcia, JE (1987) New Approaches to Effective Leadership, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J (1973) Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley, New York.Google Scholar
Hartman, SE, Hylton, J and Sanders, RF (1997) The influence of hemispheric dominance on scores of the Myers-Briggs type indicator, Educational and Psychological Measurement 57(3): 440–449.Google Scholar
Hastings, C (1993) The New Organization: Growing the Culture of Organizational Networking, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Herrmann, N (1989) The Creative Brain, Brain Books, Lake Lure NC.Google Scholar
Herrmann, N (1996) The Whole Brain Business Book, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
James, U (1986) The Herrmann, Myers Briggs connection, International Brain Dominance Review 3(2): 32–35.Google Scholar
Kirby, L (1997) Introduction: Psychological type and the Myers-Briggs type indicator, in Fitzgerald, C and Kirby, L (Eds), Developing Leaders: Research and Applications in Psychological Type and Leadership Development, pp 3–31, Davies-Black, Palo Alto CA.Google Scholar
Limerick, D and Cunnington, B (1993) Managing the New Organisation: A Blueprint for Networks and Strategic Alliances, Business & Professional Publishing, Chatswood NSW.Google Scholar
Limerick, D, Cunnington, B and Crowther, F (1998) Managing the New Organisation: Collaboration and Sustainability in the Post Corporate World, 2nd Edn, Business and Professional Publishing, Warriewood.Google Scholar
Maclean, PD (1981) The triune brain and the epistemics of the knowledge process. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Association for the advancement of Science, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
McAdam, NJ (1994) On the balance between preserving and creating: Brain styles and change – a cross-cultural reflection. Paper presented at the Seminar on Organisational Models – Cross Cultural Reflections, The Barbican, London.Google Scholar
McAdam, NJ (2002a) A brain styles model of change responsiveness and distributed leadership in 21st century network organisations, International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 5(7): 213–241. Special Issue on Leadership in the 21st Century.Google Scholar
McAdam, NJ (2002b) Evolving concepts of leadership and influence in 21st century networking organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
McAdam, NJ (2004) In search of the collaborative individual: Enabling leadership emergence in complex adaptive systems, Mt Eliza Business Review 7: 75–90.Google Scholar
McGuire, MA (1987) The contribution of intelligence to leadership performance on an inbasket test. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle WA.Google Scholar
Miles, RE and Snow, CC (1994) Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame: How Companies Succeed or Fail, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Miles, RE, Snow, CC, Mathews, G and Coleman, HJ (1997) Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form, Academy of Management Executive 11(4): 7–20.Google Scholar
Nelson, RFW (1996) Leadership, management, administration and societal change, Planning Review 01/February: 20-37.Google Scholar
Nutt, PC (1986) Decision style and its impact on managers and management, Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change 30: 341–66.Google Scholar
Ornstein, R (1972) The Psychology of Consciousness, WH Freeman & Co, New York.Google Scholar
Orton, JD and Weick, KE (1990) Loosely-coupled systems: A reconceptualisation, Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–223.Google Scholar
Power, SJ, Kummerow, JM and Lundsten, LL (1999) A Herrrmann Brain Dominance Profile analysis of the sixteen MBTI types in a sample of MBA students, Journal of Psychological Type 49: 27–36.Google Scholar
Power, SJ and Lundsten, LL (1997) Studies that compare type theory and left-brain/right-brain theory, Journal of Psychological Type 43: 22–28.Google Scholar
Savage, CM (1996) Fifth Generation Management; Co-Creating Through Virtual Enterprising, Dynamic Teaming and Knowledge Networking, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston MA.Google Scholar
Shiflett, SC (1989) Validity evidence for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of hemisphere dominance, Educational and Psychological Measurement 49(3): 741–745.Google Scholar
Stamp, G (1989) Management styles, Management Decisions 27(4): 23–29.Google Scholar
Taggart, WM and Kroeck, KG (1991) Validity evidence for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of hemisphere dominance: Another view, Educational and Psychological Measurement 51(3): 775–783.Google Scholar
Ware, R, Rytting, M and Jenkins, D (1994) The effects of stress on MBTI scores, Journal of Psychological Type 30: 39–44.Google Scholar