Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:28:20.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prologue: Stability and change*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Jennifer Bartlett ,
Stephane Tywoniak ,
Peter Cebon ,
Jaco Lok ,
Craig Prichard  and
Tracy Wilcox
Jennifer Bartlett
Affiliation:
QUT Business School, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Stephane Tywoniak
Affiliation:
Curtin Graduate School of Business, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Peter Cebon
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jaco Lok
Affiliation:
Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
Craig Prichard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business Massey University, Aotearoa, New Zealand
Tracy Wilcox
Affiliation:
Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Stability & Change
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 522 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644.Google Scholar
Augier, M., March, J., & Sullivan, B. N. (2005). Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in Anglophone North America, 1945-2000. Organization Science, 16(1), 85–96.Google Scholar
Backhouse, K. (2010). How does board conduct in Australia hinder or promote innovation within the Australian financial sector (in particular, the superannuation industry). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. L. (2007). The web of institutionalised legitimacy: Building a model of legitimacy as a raison d'etre for public relations practice. Unpublished Ph.D., Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, B. P. and Danieli, A. (1995). The role of management consultants in the development of information technology: The indissoluble nature of socio-political and technical skills. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 23–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00644Google Scholar
Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.Google Scholar
Cebon, P. (Ed.). (2008). Measured success: Innovation management in Australia. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Cebon, P. (2011). Corporate governance as a repeated-game prisoner's dilemma and the push to the defect-defect cell. in preparation.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D., & Hikino, T. (1994). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Linstead, S., & Sewell, G. (2000). Only penguins: A polemic on organization theory from the edge of the world. Organization Studies, 21, 103–117.Google Scholar
Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336–1364.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). The travel of ideas. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevon, G. (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Delbridge, R., & Edwards, T. (2007). Reflections on developments in institutional theory: Toward a relational approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Science and Training. (2001). Backing Australia's ability: An innovation action plan for the future. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
Department for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (2009). Powering ideas: An innovation agenda for the 21st Century. Canberra: Department for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.Google Scholar
De Rond, M., & Lok, J. (2010). From Putney to Mortlake: On the microfoundations of endogenous agency. Paper presented at the Best Paper Proceedings of the Sixty-Ninth Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, Montreal.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 552–550.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57–88.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. (2002). Intraorganizational institutions. In Baum, J. A. C. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 37–57). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the cause of diversification in the largest firms, 1919-1979. In Powell, W. R. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 311–336). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practice, and institutional contradiction. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–267). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 347–365.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities? In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, C., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goodrick, E., & Salancik, G. R. (1996). Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 1–28.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008) Introduction. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.Google Scholar
Kellog, K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 657–711.Google Scholar
Kipping, M., & Engwall, L. (2003). Management consulting: Emergence and dynamics of a knowledge industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4), 535–558.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asia perspective. Academy Of Management Journal, 50(3), 510–513.Google Scholar
Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1234–1240.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical review. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Mangham, I. L. (1986). Power and performance in organizations: An exploration of executive process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Metzler, M. S. (2001). The centrality of organisational legitimacy to public relations practice. In Heath, R. L. (Ed.), The handbook of public relations (pp. 321–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.Google Scholar
Mutch, A., Delbridge, R., & Ventresca, M. (2006). Situating organizational action: The relational sociology of organizations. Organization, 13(5), 607–625.Google Scholar
Neilsen, E. H., & Rao, H. (1987). The strategy-legitimacy nexus: A thick description. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 523–533.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37, 769–789.Google Scholar
Parker, M. (1999). Capitalism, subjectivity and ethics: Debating labour process analysis. Organization Studies, 20(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Prichard, C., Sayers, J., & Bathurst, R. (2007). Franchise, margin and locale; Notes on constructing a critical management studies locale in Aotearoa/New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 22(1), 22–44.Google Scholar
Review of the National Innovation System. (2008). Venturous Australia: Building strength in innovation. North Melbourne: Review of the National Innovation System.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2010). Communities of management knowledge diffusion. Prometheus 28(2), 111–132.Google Scholar
Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1996) Institutionalism ‘old’ and ‘new’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277.Google Scholar
Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
Sevon, G. (1996). Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevon, G. (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 49–67). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Solow, R. N. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–3202.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574.Google Scholar
Stryker, R. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179–223.Google Scholar
Sturdy, A., Handley, K., & Clark, T. (2009). Management consultancy: Boundaries and knowledge in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
Sutherland, F., & Smith, A. (2011). Duality theory and the management of the change–stability paradox. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(4), 534–547.Google Scholar
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organisations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. (2009). Editor's introduction – autonomy of inquiry: Shaping the future of emerging scientific communities. Management and Organizational Review, 5(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Uskiken, B., & Passadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503–526.Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick's theory. Organization Studies, 27, 1639–1660.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., Suhomlinova, O., & Mueller, F. (2011). Dialogue and distributed agency in institutional transmission. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(4), 548–569.Google Scholar