Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:51:10.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A process model of prosocial behavior: The interaction of emotion and the need for justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Harry “Trip” Knoche  and
Ethan P. Waples
Harry “Trip” Knoche
Affiliation:
Management Department, College of Business, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK, USA
Ethan P. Waples
Affiliation:
Management Department, College of Business, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on prosocial behavior has tended to focus on the positive consequences of prosocial behavior. This paper draws on attribution, emotion and justice motive literature to expand the discussion of prosocial behavior in organizations. Specifically, an expanded definition of prosocial behavior is offered and a process-oriented process model of prosocial behavior is introduced. The process model of prosocial behavior is used to discuss the idea that prosocial behavior might have negative consequences. This paper contributes to the literature on prosocial behavior in organizations by (1) accounting for the effects of emotion and the need for justice on decisions to engage in prosocial actions and (2) identifying negative consequences of specific prosocial actions.

Keywords

organizational behaviorsocial exchangeemotions and moodorganizational justiceorganizational citizenship behavior
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 96 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personalit y and Social Psychology , 104(4), 1–18.Google Scholar
Ashton-James, C. E., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). Affective events theory: A strategic perspective. In W. J. Zerbe, C. E. J. Hartel, & N. M. Ashkanasy (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations (Vol. 4, pp. 1–34). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing/JAI Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. D., Carvallo, M., Brown, R. P., & Osterman, L. (2010). Forgiveness and the Need to Belong. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1148–1160.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1990). How social an animal?: The human capacity for caring. American Psychologist, 45(3), 336–346.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-Induced altruistic motivation. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial Motives, Emotions and Behavior: The Better Angels of Our Nature (pp. 15–34). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Oleson, K. C. (1991). Current status of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial Behavior (pp. 62–85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. P. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (Volume 5, Personality and Social Psychology, 463–506). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495–509.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542–559.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14(2), 229–246.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2000). Influence: Science and Practice (4th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Chrisman, K. (1994). Resource allocation in intimate relationships: Trying to make sense of a confusing literature. In M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond (pp. 65–88). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. (2003). Living history. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A Meta-analytic review of the 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, June, 2001, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27(3), 324–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F. (1991). The empathy-altruism hypothesis: Paradigm and promise. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(9), 249–260.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A. (2007). Emotions in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 315–386.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.) (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T., McKee, I. R., & Bekker, N. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 1–13.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179–187.Google Scholar
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351–374.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., Dutton, J., & Rosso, B. D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898–918.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group process (pp. 235–266). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Grote, N. K., & Clark, M. S. (1998). Distributive justice norms and family work: What is perceived as ideal, what is applied, and what predicts fairness. Social Justice Research, 11(3), 243–270.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism a part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 121–137.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 440–455). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D., Haidt, J., & Shioto, M. N. (2006). Social functionalism and the evolution of emotions. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution of social psychology (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–32.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental illusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1996). Doing justice to the justice motive. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Lui, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249–266.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321–336.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.) (2010). Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7, 5–28.Google Scholar
Montada, L. (2003). Justice, equity, and fairness in human relations. In T. Millon, M. J. Lerner, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology : Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, 537–568). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Montada, L., & Kirchhoff, S. (2000). Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe "Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral" Nr. 130. [Apologies, justifications and excuses: Their effects on social relations]. Trier, Germany: Universitat Trier, Fachbereich I-Psychologie.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (1996). Is justice finite? The case of environmental inclusion. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 213–230). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905–917.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.Google Scholar
Roch, S. G., & Shanock, L. R. (2006). Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice dimensions. Journal of Management, 2006, 299–322.Google Scholar
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta-analytical review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 815–848.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2010). Prosocial motivation and behavior in close relationships. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 327–345). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Schachter, S. (1964). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 48–81). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651.Google Scholar
Sproul, R. C. (1986). Chosen by God. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.Google Scholar
Strelan, P., Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence of compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1538–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strelan, P., & McKee, I. R. (2014). Inclusive justice beliefs and forgiveness: Commonality through self-transcending values. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 87–92.Google Scholar
Strelan, P., McKee, I. R., Calic, D., Cook, L., & Shaw, L. L. (2013). For whom do we forgive? A functional analysis of forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 20, 124–139.Google Scholar
Strelan, P., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 163–168.Google Scholar
Vasquez, K., Keltner, D., Ebenbach, D. H., & Banaszynski, T. L. (2001). Cultural variation and similarity in moral rhetorics: Voices from the Philippines and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement-related motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar
Welch, J., & Byrne, J. A. (2001). Jack: Straight from the gut. New York, NY: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Wispe, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun, S., Takeuchi, R., & Liu, W. (2007). Employee self-enhancement motives and job performance behaviors: Investigating the moderating effects of employee role ambiguity and managerial perceptions of employee commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 745–756.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Epley, N. (2009). Self-centered social exchange: Differential use of costs versus benefits in prosocial reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 796–810.Google Scholar