Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:36:35.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Person-organization fit and organizational citizenship behavior: Time perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Yu-Chen Wei
Yu-Chen Wei*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Management, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Viewing organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) engagement from the time cost perspective, this study not only investigates the direct effect of person—organization (P—O) fit on OCB but also examines the moderating effect of time evaluation on the effective magnitude of P—O fit on OCB. Specifically, I hypothesized that the positive relationship between P—O fit and OCB will be strengthened (weakened) if employees have a higher future (present) orientation time perspective. A sample of 262 bank financial specialists with supervisor-rated dependent variables is used to examine the hypothesized relationships. Research findings suggest that P—O fit can predict OCB engagement. I also found that time evaluation plays a moderating role in the relationship between P—O fit and OCB such that P—O fit will have a weaker predictive power if the employees have a higher present-orientation time perspective. The research results provide further understanding of why employees engage in OCB.

Keywords

time perspectivepresent-orientationfuture-orientationtime evaluationperson-organization fitorganizational citizenship behaviorextra-role behavior
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , November 2012 , pp. 833 - 844
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260.Google Scholar
Blau, G. (1993). Work adjustment theory: A critique and suggestions for future research and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 105–112.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bluedorn, A. C., & Denhardt, R. B. (1988). Time and organizations. Journal of Management, 14, 299–320.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M., & Parsons, C. R. (2001). Person– organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 1–23.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: A predictor of employee voluntary turnover. In Turnipseed, D. L. (ed.), Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 435–454). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P., Hui, C., & Sego, D. J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 922–931.Google Scholar
DeVoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2007). When time is money: The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 1–13.Google Scholar
Evans, J., Kunda, G., & Barley, S. R. (2004). Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 1–38.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1985). Time in perspective: A psychology today survey report. Psychology Today, 19, 21–26.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 165–167.Google Scholar
Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). Social power as a means of increasing personal and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(3), 412–432.Google Scholar
Joireman, J., Kamdar, D., Daniels, D., & Duell, B. (2006). Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1307–1320.Google Scholar
Jourdan, F. (1993). Test–retest measurement of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
Keough, K. A. (1993). Emotions and moods as filtered through the lens of time perspective and gender (Unpublished manuscript). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.Google Scholar
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person—organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.Google Scholar
de Lara, P. Z. M. (2008). Should faith and hope be included in the employees' agenda? Linking P–O fit and citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 73–88.Google Scholar
Larrick, R. P., Morgan, J. N., & Nisbett, R. E. (1990). Teaching the use of cost–benefit reasoning in everyday life. Psychological Science, 1, 362–370.Google Scholar
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.Google Scholar
Mayfield, C. O., & Taber, T. D. (2010). A prosocial self-concept approach to understanding organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 741–763.Google Scholar
Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424–432.Google Scholar
Messer, B. A. E., & White, F. A. (2006). Employees' mood, perceptions of fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business & Psychology, 21, 65–82.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, T. W., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351–357.Google Scholar
Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607–618.Google Scholar
Murphy, G., Athanasou, J., & King, N. (2002). Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 287–297.Google Scholar
Newton, C. J., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2008). Role stressors, participative control, and subjective for with organizational values: Main and moderating effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
Niehoff, B., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. I., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organization commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 351–363.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10, 133–151.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). A meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerrand Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 380–399.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Hui, C. (1993). Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance. In Ferris, G. R. (ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 1–40). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.Google Scholar
Poon, J. M. L. (2006). Trust-in-supervisor and helping coworkers: Moderating effect of perceived politics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 518–532.Google Scholar
Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15, 131–134.Google Scholar
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426.Google Scholar
Smart, R. G. (1968). Future time perspectives in alcoholics and social drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 81–83.Google Scholar
Suazo, M. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2011). Implications of psychological contract breach: A perceived organizational support perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 366–382.Google Scholar
Sun, L.-Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). Highperformance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 558–577.Google Scholar
Vilela, B. B., Varela Gonzalez, J. A., & Ferrin, P. F. (2008). Person–organization fit, OCB and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor–salesperson data set in a Spanish context. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 1005–1019.Google Scholar
Walz, S. M., & Niehoff, B. P. (1996). Organizational citizenship behaviors and their effect on organizational-effectiveness in limited-menu restaurants. In Keys, J. B. & Dosier, L. N. (Eds.), Academy of management best paper proceedings (pp. 307–311). New York, NY: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Weeks, W. A., & Fournier, C. (2010). The impact of time congruity on salesperson's role stress: A person–job fit approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sale Management, 30, 73–90.Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023.Google Scholar