Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:53:43.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organisational Change Stories and Management Research: Facts or Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Patrick Dawson
Patrick Dawson*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Management Studies, Aberdeen, AB24 3QY, Scotland, UK Phone: +44 1224 272712, Fax: +44 1224 273843, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organisational change stories are often constructed around a linear series of ‘successful’ events that serve to show the company in a positive light to any interested external party. These stories of company success sanitize complex change processes and offer data for change experts to formulate neat linear prescriptions on how to best manage change. This article criticizes this position and argues that change is a far more dynamic political process consisting of competing histories and ongoing multiple change narratives which may vie for dominance in seeking to be the change story. A central aim is to identify and unpack narratives of change in order to highlight a number of theoretical and methodological implications for management research. It is argued that post-hoc rationalized stories should not be used as a knowledge base for prescriptive lessons or theoretical developments, nor should research data simply be presented as a single authentic story of change. The need to study change overtime and to accommodate multiple stories that may be reshaped, replaced and modified raise critical issues of data collection and data analysis, as well as important questions on the place of the conventional case study as a conveyor of research findings. As such, the article calls for the more widespread use of the concept of ‘competing histories’ and ‘multiple change narratives’ in longitudinal studies that seek to explain processes of organisational change.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , January 2003 , pp. 37 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albrecht, K 1992, The only thing that matters: Bringing the power of the customer into the centre of your business, HarperBusiness, New York.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H 1999, Organisations evolving, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Boje, D 1991, ‘The storytelling organisation: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol, 36, pp. 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, D & Badham, R 1999, Power, politics, and organisational change, Winning the turf game, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Burnes, B 2000, Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics, 3rd edn. Pitman, London.Google Scholar
Byatt, AS 1991, Possession, Vintage, London.Google Scholar
Collins, D 2000, Management fads and buzzwords: Critical-practical perspectives. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Collins, D 1998, Organisational change: Sociological perspectives, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B 1998, A narrative approach to organisation studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, B & Sevon, G (eds) 1996, Translating organisational change, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P 2003, Reshaping change: A processual perspective, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Y 2000, Storytelling in organisations, Facts, fictions and fantasies, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hammer, M & Champy, J 1993, Reegineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution, HarperBusiness, New York.Google Scholar
Hamel, G 2000, Leading the revolution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Handy, C 2001, The elephant and the flea, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Handy, C 1997, The hungry spirit, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Handy, C 1994, The empty raincoat, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Hatch, J 1997, Organisation theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Huczynski, A 1993, Management gurus: What makes them and how to become one, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Jackson, B 2001, Management gurus and management fashions, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, D 2001, Organisation theory: Tension and change. McGraw-Hill, Boston.Google Scholar
Kanter, RM 1985, The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Kanter, RM 1990, When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s, Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Kanter, RM, Stein, BA & Jick, TD 1992, The challenge of organisational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kelemen, M, Forrester, P & Hassard, J 2000, ‘BPR and TQM: Divergence or convergence?’, in Knights, D & Willmott, H eds, The reengineering revolution, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Knights, D & Willmott, H (eds) 2000, The reengineering revolution. Critical studies of corporate change, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Kotter, J 1996, Leading change, Harvard Business School Press, Harvard.Google Scholar
Kotter, J 1995, ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’, Haryard Business Review, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
Peters, T 1989, Thriving on chaos, Pan Books, London.Google Scholar
Peters, T 1993, Liberation management: Necessary disorganisation for nanosecond nineties, Pan Books, London.Google Scholar
Peters, T 1997, The circle of innovation, Alfred A Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Peters, T & Waterman, R 1982, In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A 1990, ‘Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice’, Organization Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar