Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:29:02.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The network dimensions of intra-organizational social capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Fabio Nonino
Fabio Nonino*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti, Sapienza – University of Rome, Rome, Italy
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article provides the results of research carried out within the organizational social capital theory and the network theory of organizations. The research contributes to these theories by identifying, through an analysis of the literature, 10 informal network sources of intra-organizational social capital. A model for representing and measuring intra-organizational social capital based on the 10 informal organizational networks identified and on three different conceptual perspectives (structural, relational and cognitive) is subsequently proposed. The model is validated through an empirical study conducted within five divisions of a knowledge-intensive company. The research results suggest that among the 10 informal relationships studied, the accessibility of individuals primarily predicts the emergence of more informal relationships, which are the real source of intra-organizational social capital through resource exchange and combination. Furthermore a continuous working cooperation and the willingness of colleagues to make themselves available for cooperation also create a shared organizational culture in terms of language, norms and values and maintain a stable working information flow within organizations.

Keywords

informal networksintra-organizational social capitalsocial network analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , July 2013 , pp. 454 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, L., Cross, R., Lesser, E., Levin, D. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 64–77.Google Scholar
Adler, P., Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospect for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.Google Scholar
Allen, J., James, A. D., Gamlen, P. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: A case study using social network analysis. R&D Management, 37, 179–196.Google Scholar
Balkundi, P., Harrison, D. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49–68.Google Scholar
Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York, NY: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
Battistella, C., Nonino, F. (2012). What drives collective innovation? Exploring the system of drivers for motivations in open innovation web-based platforms. Information Research, 17, paper 513. Retrieved from http://InformationRnet/ir/17-1/paper513htmlGoogle Scholar
Biotto, M., De Toni, A. F., Nonino, F. (2012). Knowledge and cultural diffusion along the supply chain as drivers of product quality improvement: The illycaffè case study. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23, 212–237.Google Scholar
Bordieau, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432–445.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991–1013.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Burkhardt, M. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure forms and action (pp. 191–215). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 14–31.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Krackhardt, D. (1999). The social capital of 21st century leaders. In J. G. Hunt, G. E. Dodge, & L. Wong (Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership (pp. 179–194). Stanford, CA: Jay Press.Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Labianca, G. (1999). Corporate social capital and liabilities. In R. Leenders & S. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 323–338). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869–898.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 345–423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–121.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., Parker, A. (2001). Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23, 215–235.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44, 25–46.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928–937.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go or stop. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 105–112.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15, 46–462.Google Scholar
De Graaf, N. D., Flap, H. D. (1988). With a little help from my friends: Social resources as an explanation of occupational status and income in West Germany, The Netherlands, and the United States. Social Forces, 67, 452–472.Google Scholar
De Toni, A. F., Nonino, F. (2010). The key roles in the informal organization: A network analysis perspective. The Learning Organization, 17, 86–103.Google Scholar
De Toni, A. F., Nonino, F., Pivetta, M. (2011). A model for assessing the coherence of companies’ knowledge strategy. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 9, 327–341.Google Scholar
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). Multicollinearity robust QAP for multiple-regression. North American Association for Computational Social and Organization Sciences (NAACSOS) Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72, 563–581.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, T., Sillince, J. A. A. (2011). Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization. Organization Studies, 32, 1515–1537.Google Scholar
Donahue, K. B. (2001). Time to get serious about talent management. Harvard Management Update, 6, 6–7.Google Scholar
Edgington, E. S. (1969). Approximate randomization tests. Journal of Psychology, 72, 143–149.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society, and development. Third World Quarterly, 22, 7–20.Google Scholar
Gargiulo, M., Benassi, M. (1999). The dark side of social capital. In R. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 298–322). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 238–262.Google Scholar
Grandori, A., Soda, G. (2006). A relational approach to organization design. Industry and Innovation, 13, 151–172.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130–138.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13, 232–248.Google Scholar
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., Pennings, J. M. (1971). Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216–229.Google Scholar
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226–251.Google Scholar
Ho, V. T., Levesque, L. L. (2005). Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science, 16, 275–289.Google Scholar
Hubert, L. (1983). Inference procedures for the evaluation of proximity matrices. In J. Felsenstein (Ed.), Numerical taxonomy (pp. 209–228). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hubert, L. (1985). Combinatorial data analysis: Association and partial association. Psychometrika, 50, 449–467.Google Scholar
Hubert, L. (1987). Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Hubert, L., Golledge, R. G. (1981). A heuristic method for the comparison of related structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23, 214–226.Google Scholar
Hubert, L., Schultz, L. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and statistical psychology, 29, 129–241.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in advertising firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H. (1993a). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471–501.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H. (1993b). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great american cities. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Kijkuit, B., van den Ende, J. (2010). With a little help from our colleagues: A longitudinal study of social networks for innovation. Organization Studies, 31, 451–479.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 87–108.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. (1992). The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 168–180.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171–186.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10, 359–381.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Network and organizations: Structure, forms, and action (pp. 216–239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183–210.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D., Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71, 104–111.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D., Kilduff, M. (1990). Friendship patterns and culture: The control of organizational diversity. American Anthropologist, 92, 142–154.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D., Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., Brass, D. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 596–614.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 55–67.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., Fairbank, J. F., Thomas, J. B., Gioia, D. A., Umphress, E. E. (2001). Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organization Science, 12, 312–330.Google Scholar
Leana, C. R., Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 538–555.Google Scholar
Leenders, R., Gabbay, S. M. (1999). Corporate social capital and liability. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital, a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Fu, Y. C., Hsung, R. M. (2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57–81). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luo, J. (2005). Particularistic trust and general trust: A network analysis in Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 1, 437–458.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer research, 27, 209–220.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V., Hurlbert, J. S. (1988). Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Social Forces, 66, 1038–1059.Google Scholar
Maurer, I., Bartsch, V., Ebers, M. (2011). The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies, 32, 157–185.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.Google Scholar
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Physiology Today, 2, 60–67.Google Scholar
Moerbeek, H. S., Need, A. (2003). Enemies at work: Can they hinder your career? Social Networks, 25, 67–82.Google Scholar
Moody, J., White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377–401.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. E. (2001). On the shape of verbal networks in organizations. Organization Studies, 22, 797–823.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘BA’ – building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.Google Scholar
Nonino, F., Panizzolo, R. (2007). Integrated production/distribution planning in the supply chain: The Febal case study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12, 150–163.Google Scholar
Nosek, J. T. (2004). Group cognition as a basis for supporting group knowledge creation and sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 54–64.Google Scholar
Oh, H., Chung, M., Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3–13.Google Scholar
Prashantham, S., Dhanaraj, C. (2010). The dynamic influence of social capital on the international growth of new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 967–994.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and economic growth. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.Google Scholar
Rank, O. N. (2008). Formal structures and informal networks: Structural analysis in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24, 145–161.Google Scholar
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.Google Scholar
Rice, R. E., Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219–244.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. H., O'Reilly, C. A. (1979). Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 42–57.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rulke, D. L., Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46, 612–626.Google Scholar
Shah, P. P. (2000). Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 101–112.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. A. C. (2005). Knowledge sharing and strategic capital: The importance and identification of opinion leaders. The Learning Organization, 12, 563–574.Google Scholar
Smouse, P. E., Long, J. C., Sokal, R. R. (1986). Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology, 35, 627–632.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325.Google Scholar
Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organisations. Academy of Management Review, 4, 507–519.Google Scholar
Tortoriello, M., Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 167–181.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13, 179–190.Google Scholar
Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.Google Scholar
Umphress, E. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Kass, E., Scholten, L. (2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational/justice. Organization Science, 14, 738–753.Google Scholar
Wegener, B. (1991). Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment. American Sociological Review, 56, 60–71.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support? Advance in Group Process, 9, 207–235.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (2008). Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 122–146.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. (2010). Harvesting family firms – Organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 345–366.Google Scholar