Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:23:03.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the ‘first generation’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Roslyn Cameron
Roslyn Cameron*
Affiliation:
School of Commerce and Management, Central Queensland University, Tweed Heads, NSW, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mixed methods is a youthful but increasingly robust methodological movement characterised by: a growing body of trans-disciplinary literature; prominent research methodologists/authorities; the emergence of mixed method specific journals, research texts, and courses; a growth in popularity amongst research funding bodies. Mixed methods is being utilised and reported within business and management fields, despite the quantitative traditions attached to certain business and management disciplines. This paper has utilised a multistrand conversion mixed model research design to undertake a retrospective content analysis of refereed papers (n = 281) from the 21st Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference 2007. The aim of the study is to provide a methodological map of the management research reported at the conference, and in particular the use, quality and acceptance level of mixed methods research within business and management fields. Implications for further research are discussed along with a call to the ‘first generation’ of business and management mixed method researchers to instigate mixed methods research training and capacity building within their respective business schools, relevant academies and associated professional forums and publications.

Keywords

mixed methodsresearch trainingmanagement researchresearch designdata integrationmultistrand conversion mixed model
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 245 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and health sciences. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
ANZAM (2007). Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management. Retrieved 20 06, 2009 from: http://www.anzam.org/Google Scholar
Bazeley, P. (2008). Mixed methods in management research. In Holt, R. & Thorpe, R. (Eds.), Dictionary of qualitative management research (pp. 133–136). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: A discussion paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Methods Review Paper. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http://www.ncrm.ac.uk/research/outputs/publications/documents/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brannen, J. (2009). Prologue: Mixed methods for novice researchers: Reflections and themes. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2008). Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research? In Bergman, M. (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 87–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261–276.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. (2007). Contextualizing methods choice in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), 483–501.Google Scholar
Cameron, R., & Miller, P. (2007). Mixed methods research: Phoenix of the paradigm wars. 21st Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference. Sydney, 12 2007.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (2008). Mixed methods in management research: Has the Phoenix landed?22nd Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference. Auckland, 12 2008.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and missed method approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods, 3(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., Tashakkori, A., Jensen, K. D., & Shapley, K. (2003). Teaching mixed methods research: Practices, dilemmas, and challenges. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 135–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Currall, S. C., & Towler, A. J. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: Toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. C (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 513–526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. D. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–174.Google Scholar
Hanson, D., & Grimmer, M. (2005). The mix of qualitative and quantitative research in major marketing journals. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1–2), 58–70.Google Scholar
Hanson, W., Creswell, J., Clark, V., Petska, K., & Creswell, J. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235.Google Scholar
Hurmerinta-Peltomaki, L., & Nummela, N. (2006). Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46(4), 439–459Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researchers, 33(7), 14–26.Google Scholar
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & quantity. International Journal of Methodology, 43(2), 265–275.Google Scholar
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. (1997). Multi-paradigm multim-ethodology. In Mingers, J. & Gill, A. (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 291–312). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 233–249.Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (Eds.). (1997). Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Molina-Azorin, J. (2009). Understanding how mixed methods research is under-taken within a specific research community: The case of business students. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 85–95.Google Scholar
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13(2), 92–98.Google Scholar
Plano Clark, V. L. (2005). Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counselling psychology, and primary care. Doctoral dissertation, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
Powell, H., Mihalas, S., Onwuegbuzie, A., Suldo, S., & Daley, C. (2008). Mixed methods in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 291–309.Google Scholar
Rocco, T. S., Bliss, L. A., Gallagher, S., & Pérez-Prado, A. (2002). Mixed methods use in HRD and AE. In Kuchinke, K. P. (Ed.), Academy of human resource development 1999 conference proceeding (pp. 880–887). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar
Rocco, T. S., Bliss, L. A., Gallagher, S., & Perez-Prado, A. (2003). Taking the next step: Mixed methods research in organisational systems. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
Sale, J., & Brazil, K. A. (2004). A strategy to identify critical appraisal criteria for primary mixed-method studies. Quality and Quantity, 38(4), 351–365.Google Scholar
Schifferdecker, K. (2007). Use of mixed methods in medical education research: A review of the literature. Presented at the Association of American Medical Colleges Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2–7 11 2007.Google Scholar
Schifferdecker, K., & Reed, V. (2009). Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Medical Education, 43(7), 637–644.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. C (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Welch, D. E., & Welch, L. S. (2004). Getting published: The last great hurdle? In Marschan-Piekkari, R. & Welch, R. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business (pp. 551–569). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar