Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:27:00.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mediating effect of leader–member exchange on the relationship between Theory X and Y management styles and affective commitment: A multilevel analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Faruk Şahin
Faruk Şahin*
Affiliation:
The Ministry of National Defense, Muğla, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between McGregor's Theory X and Y management styles and affective commitment through the mediating mechanism of the leader–member exchange (LMX). Adopting a multilevel perspective to explain the complex relations among variables, data were collected from 56 supervisors and 173 subordinates from yacht building companies in Turkey. The results indicated that the Theory Y management style related positively to affective commitment and LMX. In addition, the results indicated that LMX partially mediated the relationship between the Theory Y management style and affective commitment. However, the Theory X management style had no relationships with either LMX or affective commitment. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Theory X and Y management stylesaffective commitmentleader–member exchange
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 159 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.Google Scholar
Aycan, Z., & Paşa, S. (2003). Career choices, job selection criteria, and leadership preferences in a transitional nation: The case of Turkey. Journal of Carrier Development, 30, 129–144.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator– mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1967). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bobic, M. P., & Davis, W. E. (2003). A kind word for Theory X: Or why so many newfangled management techniques quickly fail? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 239–264.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H. C., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cevriog˘lu, E. (2007). The relationship between leader-member exchange and the individual and organizational outcomes: An empirical study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1992). Antecedents of organizational commitment across occupational groups: A meta analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(6), 539–558.Google Scholar
Dansereau, F. Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.Google Scholar
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader–member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., et al. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085–1103.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1968). The basis of social power. In Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 259–269). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In Hunt, J. G., & Larson, L. L. (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Graen, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). LMX leadership: Global organizing design. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175–208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.Google Scholar
Heil, G., Bennis, W., & Stephens, D. C. (2000). Douglas McGregor, revisited: Managing the human side of the enterprise. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: Internationaldifferences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. (2002). Arabic cluster: A bridge between east and west. Journal of World Business, 37, 40–54.Google Scholar
Kopelman, R. E., Prottas, D. J., & Davis, A. L. (2008). Douglas McGregor's theory X and Y: Toward a construct-valid measure. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(2), 255–271.Google Scholar
Kopelman, R. E., Prottas, D. J., & Falk, D. W. (2010). Construct validation of a theory X/Y behavior scale. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(2), 120–135.Google Scholar
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader–member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In Ferris, G. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Lepak, D. P., Takeuchi, R., & Sims, H. P. Jr. (2003). Matching leadership styles with employment modes: Strategic human resource management perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 127–152.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.Google Scholar
McGregor, D., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (2006). The human side of enterprise (annotated edition). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. M. (1966). Leadership and motivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. M. (1967). The professional manager. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovich, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.Google Scholar
Miner, J. B. (2003). The rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 250–268.Google Scholar
Morse, J. J., & Lorsch, J. W. (1970). Beyond theory Y. Harvard Business Review, 48(3), 61–68.Google Scholar
Mowday, R., Steers, R., & Porter, L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. III, & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.Google Scholar
Özkaya, M. O., Kocakoç, İ. D., & Karaa, E. (2006). Yöneticilerin örgütsel bağlılıkları ve demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeye yönelik bir alan çalışması [The relations between the demographic factors of managers and organizational commitment: A field study]. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 13(2), 77–96.Google Scholar
Özutku, H. (2008). Örgüte duygusal, devamlılık ve normatif bag˘lılık ile is ¸ performansı arasındaki ilis ¸ kinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the relationship between job performance and affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization]. I˙ stanbul Üniversitesi I˙ s¸ letme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 79–97.Google Scholar
Özutku, H., Ağca, V., & Cevrioğlu, E. (2008). Lider-üye etkileşimi teorisi çerçevesinde, yönetici-ast etkileşimi ile örgütsel bağlılık boyutları ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki: Ampirik bir inceleme [Leader-member exchange, organizational commitment and job performance: An empirical study]. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 193–210.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, T. A. (2002). Hierarchical linear model: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Reddin, W. J. (1969). What's wrong with the style theories? Training and Development Journal, 23, 14–17.Google Scholar
Reichers, A. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465–476.Google Scholar
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.Google Scholar
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436.Google Scholar
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63–113.Google Scholar
Schyns, B., Paul, T., Mohr, G., & Blank, H. (2005). Comparing antecedents and consequences of leader – Member exchange in a German working context to findings in the US. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.Google Scholar
Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader– member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542–548.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522–552.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. M., & Bennis, W. G. (1972). The management of change and conflict: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Hite, J. P. (1995). Choice of employee–organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors. In Ferris, G. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 117–151). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. (2003). Reciprocity in manager–subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29, 511–532.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, C., Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Delhaise, T. (2001). An examination of the cross-cultural validity of a multidimensional model of commitment in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 322–347.Google Scholar
Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 303–321.Google Scholar
Wasti, S. A. (2008). Organizational commitment: Complication or clarification? In Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomas, D. C. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management research (pp. 95–115). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wayne, S. J., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Eisenberger, R., Liden, R. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Shore, L. M. (2009). Social influences. In Klein, H. J., Becker, T. E., & Meyer, J. P. (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions (pp. 253–284). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.Google Scholar
Yrle, A. C., Hartman, S., & Galle, W. P. (2002). An investigation of relationships between communication style and leader–member exchange. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 257–268.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1990). Theory and research on leadership in organization. In Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 147–197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar