Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:39:16.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intrinsic motivation and knowledge sharing in the mood–creativity relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Chaoying Tang ,
Xiaoyang Lu  and
Stefanie E. Naumann Open the ORCID record for Stefanie E. Naumann [Opens in a new window]
Chaoying Tang
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing100190, Haidian District, China
Xiaoyang Lu
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing100190, Haidian District, China
Stefanie E. Naumann*
Affiliation:
Eberhardt School of Business, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA95219, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stefanie E. Naumann, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although studies have identified a link between employee intrinsic motivation (IM) and creativity and between positive mood and creativity, some of this study has been equivocal and little research has included these variables in an integrative model. Drawing from several theories of IM, we address this gap by proposing that IM is a critical intervening mechanism in the relationship between positive mood and creativity, and team knowledge sharing affects the power of this mechanism. Research on field data from 120 R&D team members in 30 teams found that team-level knowledge sharing moderated the relationship between employees' positive mood and IM, and IM mediated the relationship between employees' positive mood and their creativity. Implications of our findings are discussed.

Keywords

Employee creativityintrinsic motivationpositive moodteam knowledge sharing
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , First View , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Feeling good and performing well? Psychological engagement and positive behaviors at work. In Albrecht, S. (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 385–398). Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., Totterdell, P., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brown, L. V. (2007). Psychology of motivation. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M. A. K. (2012). Toward a tripartite model of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1147–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Campbell-Bush, E. M., Wu, Z., & Wu, X. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2010). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior with concept maps. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Cury, F., Biddle, S., Famose, J. P., Sarrazin, P., Durand, M., & Goudas, M. (1996). Personal and situational factors influencing intrinsic interest of adolescent girls in school physical education: A structural equation modelling analysis. Educational Psychology, 16(3), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2007). Personal initiative, commitment and affect at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197–208.Google Scholar
Erez, A., & Isen, A. M. (2002). The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassandra, M., Goudas, M., & Chroni, S. (2003). Examining factors associated with intrinsic motivation in physical education: A qualitative approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(3), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hon, A. H. (2012). Shaping environments conducive to creativity: The role of intrinsic motivation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hon, A. H., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Hsieh, J. J., & He, W. (2014). Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: The contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 816–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hung, S., Durcikova, A., Lai, H., & Lin, W. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 75–170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, M., Xu, H., Zhou, A., & Yuan, Y. (2019). Implicit followership theory to employee creativity: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krok, E. (2013). Willingness to share knowledge compared with selected social psychology theories. Contemporary Economics, 7(1), 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lampel, J., & Germain, O. (2016). Creative industries as hubs of new organizational and business practices. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2327–2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, S., Bartol, K. M., Venkataramani, V., Zheng, X., & Liu, X. (2019). Pitching novel ideas to the boss: The interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Men, C., Fong, P. S., Luo, J., Zhong, J., & Huo, W. (2019). When and how knowledge sharing benefits team creativity: The importance of cognitive team diversity. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(6), 807–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. S., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affect the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhee, S. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member interactions. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 10, 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, M. G., Bartunek, J. M., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2010). The role of affective experience in work motivation: Test of a conceptual model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 951–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C. S., Lau, X. S., Kung, Y. T., & Kailsan, R. A. L. (2019). Openness to experience enhances creativity: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C., & Ye, L. (2015). Diversified knowledge, R&D team centrality and radical creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W., & Hagedoorn, M. (2003). Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 339–348.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.Google Scholar