Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:25:57.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The innovation adoption process: A multidimensional approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2015

Magdalena Pichlak
Magdalena Pichlak*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study analyses the broad sets of factors that influence the innovation adoption process in the environmental, organizational, top managers,’ innovation and user acceptance context. The innovation adoption process is presented as a sequence of stages, progressing from initiation through adoption decision to implementation of an innovation and it is considered at the organizational level. The Delphi survey conducted among 264 experts of a diverse professional and academic experience allowed examining the perceived significance of each factor for the various stages of the innovation adoption process. The results of the analysis show that the considered factors do not affect the innovation adoption process with the same strength but exert varying levels of influence on the subsequent stages. The study discusses the implications of these findings and suggests ideas for future research.

Keywords

innovation managementDelphi methodinnovation adoption processinnovation creation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , July 2016 , pp. 476 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (2000). A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(3), 295–308.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98.Google Scholar
Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
Akgul, A. K., & Gozlu, S. (2015). The role of organizational resources and market competitiveness in innovativeness. Journal of Business, Economics & Finance, 4(1), 166–184.Google Scholar
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 359–373.Google Scholar
Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165–176.Google Scholar
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking – does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. (2015). Extending tam to information visualization: A framework for evaluation. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 18(1), 46–58.Google Scholar
Bstieler, L. (2005). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 267–284.Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and begin environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F., Chiu, H. H., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2009). Organizational complexity, resources and the adoption of management innovations: The Influence of adoption process. Liverpool: European Academy of Management Conference.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17, 215–236.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269–291.Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.Google Scholar
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 700–714.Google Scholar
European Commission Report (2012). A European strategy for key enabling technologies – A bridge to growth and jobs. Brussels: European Commission Report.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption. A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 163–176.Google Scholar
Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior. Research Policy, 32(5), 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. (1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega – International Journal Management Science, 25(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameed, M. A., & Counsell, S. (2012). Assessing the influence of environmental and CEO characteristics for adoption of information technology in organizations. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 64–84.Google Scholar
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 358–390.Google Scholar
Harris, D., & Helfat, C. (1997). Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(11), 895–920.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howieson, J., Lawley, M., & Selen, W. (2014). New product development in small food enterprises. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 12(1), 11–26.Google Scholar
Hull, F., & Hage, J. (1982). Organizing for innovation: Beyond burns and stalker’s organic type. Sociology, 16(4), 564–577.Google Scholar
Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2014). Conceptualizing the role of innovation: Attributes for examining consumer adoption of mobile innovations. The Marketing Review, 14(4), 407–430.Google Scholar
Kautz, K., & Nielsen, P. A. (2004). Understanding the implementation of software process improvement innovations in software organizations. Information Systems Journal, 14, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, N. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. In M. A., West, & J. L., Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kirkman, D. M. (2012). Social enterprises: An multi-level framework of the innovation adoption process. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 143–155.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.Google Scholar
Kwon, T. H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In J. R., Boland, & R. A., Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical issues in information systems research. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In T. M., Newcomb, & E. L., Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1993). Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 322–354.Google Scholar
Lindstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method. Westport, CT: Addison Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
Matta, V., Koonce, D., & Jeyaraj, A. (2012). Initiation, experimentation, implementation of innovations: The case for radio frequency identification systems. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 164–174.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221–235.Google Scholar
Nayan, N. M., Zaman, H. B., & Sembuk, T. M. T. (2010). Defining information system failure in Malaysia: Results from Delphi technique. International Symposium on Information Technology, 3, 1616–1621.Google Scholar
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.Google Scholar
Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 19, 221–247.Google Scholar
Ononiwu, C. G. (2013). A Delphi examination of inhibitors of the effective use of process industry Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems: A case study of New Zealand’s process industry. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 16(2), 114–131.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, P., & Patwardhan, H. (2012). Diffusion of account planning in Indian ad agencies. An organisational perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 665–692.Google Scholar
Pichlak, M., & Bratnicki, M. (2011). Revising the R&D resources-innovation relation: The moderating role of transactional and transformational leadership. Tallinn: European Academy of Management Conference.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., & Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C. M. (2014). Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: Comparing the effects of external and internal factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 521–540.Google Scholar
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega – International Journal of Management Science, 27(4), 467–484.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375.Google Scholar
Scarbrough, H., Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2015). Diffusion in the face of failure: The evolution of a management innovation. British Journal of Management, 26, 365–387.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Scopelliti, I., Cillo, P., Busacca, B., & Mazursky, D. (2014). How do financial constraints affect creativity? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 880–893.Google Scholar
Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17(1), 107–129.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega – International Journal Management Science, 24(6), 631–647.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., & Hardy, C. (2011). Where are the new theories of organization? Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 236–246.Google Scholar
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28–43.Google Scholar
Wischnevsky, J. D., Damanpour, F., & Mendez, F. A. (2011). Influence of environmental factors and prior changes on the organizational adoption of changes in products and in technological and administrative processes. British Journal of Management, 22, 132–149.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431.Google Scholar