Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:01:00.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Independent work, modern organizations and entrepreneurial labor: Diversity and hybridity of freelancers and self-employment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Dieter Bögenhold  and
Andrea Klinglmair
Dieter Bögenhold*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
Andrea Klinglmair
Affiliation:
Diakonie de la Tour, Klagenfurt, Austria
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper deals with self-employment of one-(wo)man-firms as the smallest units of entrepreneurial companies and focuses at the blurred boundaries between dependent work and self-employment. We call the overlapping identities hybrid entrepreneurs. Based on the collected data it can be shown that the hybrid self-employed differ significantly from non-hybrid ‘regular’ entrepreneurs with respect to selected socio-demographic characteristics, professional, as well as company-specific factors. The paper takes up several of the findings and tries to discuss them in a framework of (micro) organizations, institutions and self-employment. Taking the case of hybrid employment fosters crucial and provoking questions for an appropriate understanding of the division of enterprises and occupations.

Keywords

self-employmentfreelancerentrepreneurshiphybriditylabor market
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 22 , Special Issue 6: Self-employed professionals, freelancers and contractors , November 2016 , pp. 843 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 17–34.Google Scholar
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2004). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. (2007). Good capitalism, bad capitalism and the economics of growth and prosperity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berg, I., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2001). Emerging labor market structures: Contexts and correlates. In I. Berg & A. L. Kalleberg (Eds.), Sourcebook of labor markets. evolving structures and processes (pp. 3–26). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R., Hytti, U., & Welter, F. (2015). Introduction: entrepreneurship, contextual, process and gender differentiation. In R. Blackburn, U. Hytti, & F. Welter (Eds.), Context, process and gender in entrepreneurship (pp. 1–5). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, H. P. (1987). Entry into the labour market and occupational career in the Federal Republic: A comparison with American studies. In W. Teckenberg (Ed.), Comparative studies of social structure (pp. 86–115), Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D. (2004). Entrepreneurship: Multiple meanings and consequences. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2007). Micro-firms and the margins of entrepreneurship: The restructuring of the labour market. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8, 281–293.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2013a). Rationality of self-employment: Do female and male entrepreneurs differ? Journal of Business and Finance, 1(2), 42–62.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2013b). Blurred boundaries of journalism: multiple employment in the media industry and the hybridity of occupational work. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 171–183.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2016). Selbständige Erwerbsarbeit: Betrachtungen aus verschiedenen Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Publishers.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., Fink, M., & Kraus, S. (2014). Integrative entrepreneurship research – bridging the gap between sociological and economic perspectives. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6, 118–139.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., Heinonen, J., & Akola, E. (2014). Entrepreneurship and independent professionals. Social and Economic Logics, International Advances in Economic Research, 20(3), 295–310.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2014). Motive für die Tätigkeit als Ein-Personen-Unternehmen in Kärnten. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 2014, 3–24.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2015a). Micro-entrepreneurship: tendency towards precarious work? Empirical Findings for Austria, Athens Journal of Economics and Business, 1(2), 107–121.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2015b). Female solo self-employment. Features of gendered entrepreneurship. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Burke, A. (2015). Introduction: A freelancing and self-employment research agenda. In A. Burke (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Freelancing and Self-Employment (pp. iii–viii). Dublin: Senate Hall.Google Scholar
Burke, A., FitzRoy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2008). What makes a die-hard entrepreneur? Beyond the ‘employee or entrepreneur’ dichotomy. Small Business Economics, 31, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpa, H. K. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 41, 913–930.Google Scholar
Chepurenko, A. (2015). Entrepreneurial activity under ‘transition’. In R. Blackburn, U. Hytti, & F. Welter (Eds.), Context, process and gender in entrepreneurship (pp. 6–22). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695.Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, D. (2004). Re-thinking country risk: insights from entrepreneurship theory. International Business Review, 14, 209–226.Google Scholar
Eurostat-Database (2015a). Selbständigkeit nach Geschlecht, Alter und Beruf (lfsa_esgais). Retrieved September 28, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Google Scholar
Eurostat-Database (2015b). Beschäftigung nach Geschlecht, Alter und Stellung im Beruf und Beruf (lfsa_esgais). Retrieved September 28, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Google Scholar
Folta, T. B. (2007). Uncertainty rules the day. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 97–99.Google Scholar
Folta, T. B., Delmar, F., & Wennberg., K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56, 253–269.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2002). Introduction – entrepreneurship and the firm: Austrian perspectives on economic organization. In J. F. Nicolai & P. J. Klein (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the firm: Austrian perspectives on economic organization (pp. 1–10). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labor Office (ILO) (1993). Resolution concerning the International Classification of Status in Employment (ICSE), Adopted by the Fifteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians, 1 January 1993, Geneva.Google Scholar
Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467–487.Google Scholar
Johal, S., & Anastasi, G. (2015). From professional contractor to independent professional: the evolution of freelancing in the UK. Small Business Research, 22(2–3), 159–172.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work – insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs. The rise of polarized employment systems in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kasper, W., Streit, M. E., & Boettke, P. J. (2012). Institutional economics. property, competition, policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kautonen, T., Down, S., Welter, F., Vainio, P., & Palmroos, J. (2010). Involuntary self-employment as a public policy issue: a cross-country European view. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(1–2), 112–129.Google Scholar
Kautonen, T., Hytti, U., Bögenhold, D., & Heinonen, J. (2012). Job satisfaction as a determinant of prolonged working careers: a comparison of self-employed and wage earners in Finland. International Journal of Manpower, 33(4), 424–440.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1985). Discovery and the capitalist process. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1992). The meaning of market process: Essays in the development of modern Austrian economics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kitching, J., & Smallbone, D. (2012). Are freelancers a neglected form of small business? Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development, 9(1), 74–91.Google Scholar
Klinglmair, A., & Bögenhold, D. (2014). Berufliche Zufriedenheit von Ein-Personen-Unternehmen in Kärnten – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. In K. Anderwald, P. Filzmaier, & K. Hren (Eds.), Kärntner Jahrbuch für Politik (pp. 197–218). Klagenfurt: Hermagoras Publishers.Google Scholar
Leighton, P. (2011). Neither fish nor fowl: The professional self-employed and the need for a better regulatory framework. Bristol: Centre for Employment and Social Research.Google Scholar
Leighton, P. (2015). Independent professionals: legal issues and challenges. In A. Burke (Ed.), The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment (pp. 99–110). Dublin: Senate Hall.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., & Zetterberg, H. L. (1959). Social mobility in industrial societies. In S. M. Lipset & R. Reinhard (Eds.), Social mobility in industrial society (pp. 11–24). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, T. (2005). Non-standard employment: When even the elite are precarious. Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 276–293.Google Scholar
McKeown, T. (2015). What’s in a name? The value of ‘Entrepreneurs’ compared to ‘Self-Employed’ but what about ‘Freelancing’ or ‘IPro’? In A. Burke (Ed.), The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment (pp. 121–134). Dublin: Senate Hall.Google Scholar
Meager, N. (2015). Job quality and self-employment: Is it (still) better to work for yourself? In A. Burke (Ed.), The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment (pp. 35–46). Dublin: Senate Hall.Google Scholar
Piorkowsky, M. B. (2002). Die Evolution von Unternehmen im Haushalts – und Familienkontext. Grundgedanken zu einer Theorie sozioökonomischer Hybridsysteme. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Raffiee, J., & Feng, J. (2014). Should I quit my Job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936–963.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). The questions we ask and the questions we care about: Reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1927/1953). Die sozialen Klassen im ethnisch homogenen Milieu. In J. A. Schumpeter (Ed.), Aufsätze zur Soziologie (pp. 147–213). Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Shane, S. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, V. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–260.Google Scholar
Shevchuk, A., & Strebkov, D. (2015). The rise of freelance contracting on the Russian-language internet. Small Enterprise Research, 22(2–3), 146–158.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1985). Economic history and economics. American Economic Review, 75(2), 328–331.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A. (1927/1964). Social and cultural mobility. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Stel, A. V., & Vries, N. (2015). The economic value of different types of solo self-employed: A review. In A. Burke (Ed.), The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment (pp. 77–84). Dublin: Senate Hall.Google Scholar
Tilly, C., & Tilly, C. (1994). Capitalist work and labour markets. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp. 283–312). Princeton, NJ and New York: Princeton University Press and Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship, theory and practice, 35(1), 164–184.Google Scholar
Wennberg, K., Folta, T. B., & Delmar, F. (2006). A real options model of stepwise entry into self-employment. In A. Zacharakis (Ed.), Frontiers in entrepreneurship research (pp. 119–132). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
Williams, C. C. (2006). The hidden enterprise culture: Entrepreneurship in the underground economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Williams, C. C. (2008). Beyond ideal-type depictions of entrepreneurship: Some lessons from the service sector in England. The Service Industries Journal, 28(7), 1041–1053.Google Scholar
Williams, C. C. (2014). Out of the shadows: A classification of economies by the size and character of their informal sector. Work, Employment and Society, 28(5), 735–753.Google Scholar
Williams, C. C., & Round, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the informal economy: A study of Ukraine’s hidden enterprise culture. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 119–136.Google Scholar
Williams, C. C., Round, J., & Rodgers, P. (2006). Beyond necessity- and opportunity-driven entrepreneurship: Some case study evidence from Ukraine. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 22–34.Google Scholar
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich (WKO) (2014b). Ein-Personen-Unternehmen (EPU) 2014. EPU-Anteil nach Sparten (Mehrfachmitgliedschaften) (EinzelunternehmerInnen, GmbH). Vienna: WKO.Google Scholar
Woodwards, D., Rolfe, R., Lighthelm, A., & Guimaraes, P. (2011). The viability of informal microenterprise in South Africa. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 443–452.Google Scholar