Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:12:37.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegemonic dividend and workforce diversity: The case of ‘biat’ and meritocracy in nation branding in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2019

Mustafa F. Ozbilgin Open the ORCID record for Mustafa F. Ozbilgin [Opens in a new window]  and
Cagri Yalkin
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin*
Affiliation:
Brunel Business School, Brunel University, London, UK
Cagri Yalkin
Affiliation:
Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We introduce and explore the notion of hegemonic dividend in the context of a country which does not have hierarchy attenuating means such as legal measures to protect workforce diversity. This paper explains the consequences of two hierarchy enhancing ideologies on workforce diversity in Turkey; meritocracy, an ideology that privileges merit, and ‘biat’, an ideology of subservience to the structures of power. We illustrate how these two ideologies operate as a duality, as meritocracy vanes with dire circumstances for workforce diversity in nation-branding efforts of Turkey. Drawing on Bourdieu and Gramsci, we illustrate hegemonic dividend in the increasingly hegemonic system in which journalism, as a state apparatus, is embedded in Turkey, where privileged few are sustaining and advancing their positions of power by appealing to and submitting themselves to the revisioned nation brand. We focus on the news industry as it commands a special position of power in terms of creating, modifying and controlling the discourses of a nation brand. We argue that failing to protect and promote workforce diversity with hierarchy attenuating measures exposes nation branding practices to discriminatory and hierarchy enhancing ideologies that negate efforts to achieve humanisation and democratisation of work.

Keywords

hegemony and dependencemanaging diversitynational culturecross-cultural management
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Neurodiversity , July 2019 , pp. 543 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahiska, M. (2010). Occidentalism in Turkey: Questions of modernity and national identity in Turkish radio broadcasting. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Anholt, S. (2009). Nation ‘branding’: Propaganda or statecraft. Public Diplomacy Magazine. Summer.Google Scholar
Anholt, S. (2007). What is competitive identity? In Competitive identity (pp. 1–23). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barnett, A., Yandle, B., & Naufal, G. (2013). Regulation, trust, and cronyism in Middle Eastern societies: The simple economics of ‘wasta’. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 44, 41–46.Google Scholar
BBC (2017). Turkey-Netherlands Row: Dutch Ambassador Withdrawn. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42943825.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Castilla, E. J., & Bernard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 1479–1526.Google Scholar
Dinnie, K. (2014). Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dominian, L. (1916). Europe at Turkey's door. Geographical Review, 1(3), 286–294.Google Scholar
Edwards, L., & Ramamurthy, A. (2016). (In) credible India? A critical analysis of India's nation branding. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(2), 322–343.Google Scholar
Ergul, F. A. (2012). The ottoman identity: Turkish, muslim or rum? Middle Eastern Studies, 48(4), 629–645.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2013). Where Truth is Hard Cell. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from https://archives.cjr.org/feature/where_truth_is_a_hard_cell.php?page=all.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Y., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2017). Organizational diversity learning framework: going beyond diversity training programs. Personnel Review, 46(6):1120–1141.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Y., Rentschler, R., Le, H., Edwards, D., & Härtel, C. E. (2014). Lessons learned from community organizations: Inclusion of people with disabilities and others. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 518–537.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (2000). The Gramsci reader: Selected writings, 1916–1935. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (2009). Hegemony, intellectuals and the state. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader, 2, 210–216.Google Scholar
Guercio, L. (2017). What does it mean to talk about democracy in Turkey? Juridical Current, 20(1):42–58.Google Scholar
Gumuscu, S., & Sert, D. (2009). The power of the devout bourgeoisie: The case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(6), 953–968.Google Scholar
Gündemir, S., Homan, A. C., Usova, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Multicultural meritocracy: The synergistic benefits of valuing diversity and merit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 34–41.Google Scholar
Kamaşak, R., Ozbilgin, M. F., & Yavuz, M. (2019). Understanding intersectional analyses. In King, E., Roberson, Q. & Hebl, M. (Eds.), Research on social issues in management on pushing understanding of diversity in organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaneva, N. (2011). Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 25.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, F., Shivanandan, J., & Hede, A. M. (2012). Nation branding: A critical appraisal of incredible India. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(3), 319–327.Google Scholar
Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249–261.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kyriakidou, O., Kyriacou, O., Özbilgin, M., & Dedoulis, E. (2016). Equality, diversity and inclusion in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kyriakidou, O., & Ozbilgin, M. (Eds.). (2006). Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, A. (2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education. Higher Education, 62(4), 383–397.Google Scholar
Maton, K. (2014). Habitus. In Grenfell, M. J. (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu: key concepts, London: Routledge (pp. 60–76). Routledge.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M., & Slutskaya, N. (2017). Consequences of neo-liberal politics on equality and diversity at work in Britain: Is resistance futile? In Management and diversity: Thematic approaches (pp. 319–334). London: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M., & Tatli, A. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64(9), 1229–1253.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M., Tatli, A., & Jonsen, K. (2015). Global diversity management. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1989). A political perspective on careers: Interests, networks, and environments. In Arthur, H. B., Hall, D. T. and Lawrence, B. S. (eds.) in Handbook of Career Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–393.Google Scholar
Puccetti, R. (1972). Authoritarian government and academic subservience: The University of Singapore. Minerva, 10(2), 223–241.Google Scholar
Quelch, J., & Jocz, K. (2005). Positioning the nation-state. Place Branding, 1(3), 229–237.Google Scholar
Scully, M. A., & Blake-Beard, S. (2006). Locating class in organizational diversity work. In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, J. K. Pringle (eds.) in Handbook of workplace diversity, London: Sage, pp. 431–454.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Syed, J., Özbilgin, M., Torunoglu, D., & Ali, F. (2009, March). Rescuing gender equality from the false dichotomies of secularism versus shariah in Muslim majority countries. Women's Studies International Forum, 32(2), 67–79.Google Scholar
Tatli, A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2012). An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: A Bourdieuan framing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(2), 180–200.Google Scholar
Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Ariss, A. A., & Özbilgin, M. (2012). The role of regulatory and temporal context in the construction of diversity discourses: The case of the UK, France and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 293–308.Google Scholar
Uygur, S., Spence, L. J., Simpson, R., & Karakas, F. (2017). Work ethic, religion and moral energy: The case of Turkish SME owner-managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(8), 1212–1235.Google Scholar
Van Ham, P. (2001). The rise of the brand state: The postmodern politics of image and reputation. Foreign Affairs, 2–6.Google Scholar
Vassilopoulou, J., April, K., Da Rocha, J. P., Kyriakidou, O., & Ozbilgin, M. (2016). Does the ongoing global economic crisis Put diversity gains at risk?: Diversity management during hard times–international examples from the USA, South Africa, and Greece. In J. Prescott (ed) in Handbook of research on race, gender, and the fight for equality, Hershey: IGI Global (pp. 424–452).Google Scholar
Vassilopoulou, J., Kyriakidou, O., da Rocha, J. P., Georgiadou, A., & Mor Barak, M. (2018). International Perspectives on Securing Human and Social Rights and Diversity Gains at Work in the Aftermath of the Global Economic Crisis and in Times of Austerity. European Management Review.Google Scholar
Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor–subordinate Guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437–454.Google Scholar
Yalkin, C. (2018). A brand culture approach to managing nation-brands. European Management Review, 15(1), 137–149.Google Scholar
Yönem, A. (2014). Islam Mezheplerinde biat Algisinin Oluşum Süreci. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(9), 2.Google Scholar