Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:23:36.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the innovation effects of university–industry–government linkages: The case of Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Mei-Chih Hu  and
John A Mathews
Mei-Chih Hu
Affiliation:
National Tsing Hua University, Institute of Technology Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan
John A Mathews
Affiliation:
Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on university—industry—government (UIG) linkages and their influence on innovation in Taiwan. The innovation effects are estimated using a quartet of measures — technology transfers, technology licensing, firms incubated and patents granted — while the UIG influence is estimated via its differential impact according to the size of the firms involved, the type of innovation (process or product-oriented), the stage of the technology cycle, and the role of government. Using a Structural Equation Model (SEM) method to examine these interactions, the study reveals that UIG linkage effects vary with the size of company, in that the major incentive for UIG linkages for large companies is an attempt to acquire a skilled and qualified workforce, while SMEs (small and medium enterprises) tend to use them to gain marketing advantage, particularly for those SMEs or start-ups in emerging industries. The study concludes that Taiwan's innovation capacity is heavily reliant on building the capability of SMEs and continues to depend greatly on government leadership through technology-capability-enhancing institutions such as ITRI.

Keywords

university–industry–governmentinnovationSMEslarge companypatentsTaiwan
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 138 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, Z and Audretsch, D (1988) Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review 78(4): 678–90.Google Scholar
ADB (Asia Development Bank) (2007) Asian Development Outlook 2006. http://www.adb.org/Documents/books/ADO/2005/prc.asp, accessed in November 2007.Google Scholar
Amsden, AH and Chu, W.W. (2003) Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J and Sabourin, D (1999) Innovative activity in Canadian food processing establishments: the importance of engineering practices. 11F0019MPE No. 101, Micro-Economic Analysis Division, Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Breschi, S, Malerba, F and Orsenigo, L (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal 110: 388–410.Google Scholar
Breznitz, D (2005) Development, flexibility and R&D performance in the Taiwanese IT industry: capability creation and the effects of state-industry coevolution. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(1): 153–187.Google Scholar
Bryne, BM (2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, EQS and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing 1(1): 55–86.Google Scholar
Cefis, E and Orsenigo, L (2001) The persistence of innovative activities: A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy 30(7): 1139–1158.Google Scholar
Chang, YC, Chen, MH, Hua, M and Yang, PY (2006) Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: toward a ‘scientific-economic’ framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 199–213.Google Scholar
Cohen, W and Klepper, S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 78(2): 232–243.Google Scholar
Dodgson, M, Mathews, JA, Kastelle, T and Hu, MC (2008) The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research Policy 37(3): 430–445.Google Scholar
Dosi, G (1988) The microeconomic sources and effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26(3): 1120–1171.Google Scholar
Dutrénit, G (2004) Building technological capabilities in latecomer firms: A review essay. Science, Technology and Society 9(2): 209–241.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H and Leydesdorff, L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry– government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123.Google Scholar
Freeman, C (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Frances Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Goh, KS (1996) The technology ladder in development: the Singapore case. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 10(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Glänzel, W, Debackere, K and Meyer, M (2008) ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics 74(1): 71–88.Google Scholar
Hobday, M (1995) Innovation in East Asia. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Hobday, M (1994) Exportled technology development in the four dragons: The case of electronics. Development and Change 25(2): 333–361.Google Scholar
Hu, AGZ and Shin, J (2002) Climbing the technology ladder: Challenges facing Singapore in a globalized world. In Hui, WT, Koh, AT, Rao, B and Lim, KL (Eds) The Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Hu, MC and Mathews, JA (2005) National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy 134(9): 1322–1349.Google Scholar
Hu, MC and Mathews, JA (2008) China's Innovative Capacity. Research Policy 37(9): 1465–1479.Google Scholar
ITRI (Industrial Technology Research Institute) (1994–2004) Annual reports. http://www.itri.org.tw/eng/sitemap.jsp, accessed in July 2007.Google Scholar
Kamien, MI and Schwartz, NL (1982) Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lundvall, BA (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Malerba, F and Orsenigo, L (1993) Technological regimes and firm behavior. Industrial and Corporate Change 2(1): 45–71.Google Scholar
Marques, M, Alves, J and Saur, I (2005) Management and Industrial Engineering (DEGEI), University of Aveiro, Portugal. http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/aalborg05/marques.pdf+Marques+et+al+(2005)+innovation+system&hl=zh-TW&gl=tw&ct=clnk&cd=3, accessed in December 2007.Google Scholar
Mathews, JA (2002) Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19(4): 467–488.Google Scholar
Mathews, JA and Cho, DS (2000) Tiger Technology. The Creation of the Semiconductor Industry in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mathews, JA and Hu, MC (2007) Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: The case of Taiwan. World Development 25: 245–264.Google Scholar
MOEA (2003; 2006) Industrial statistical survey reports. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Moore, GA (1991) Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech goods to mainstream customers. Harper Business, New York NY.Google Scholar
Nell, E (Ed.) (1992) Transformational growth: From Say's Law to the Multiplier. Transformational Growth and Effective Demand. New York University Press, New York NY.Google Scholar
Nelson, R (1993) (Ed.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York NY.Google Scholar
Nelson, RR and Winter, S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
NSC (National Science Council) (1995; 1999; 2004; 2006) Science and technology R&D expenditure and development indicators. National Science Council, Taiwan.Google Scholar
NSF (1994) Characteristics of the Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States. National Science Foundation, Arlington VA.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2005) Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, 3rd Edition. http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343,en_2649_201185_35595607_1_1_1_1,00.html, accessed in August 2007.Google Scholar
Pavitt, K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13: 343–373.Google Scholar
Porter, ME (1998) Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions, on Competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.Google Scholar
Romer, PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): S71–S102.Google Scholar
Santoro, M and Chakrabarti, A (2001) Making industry–university partnerships work. Research-Technology Management 45(3): 42–46.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (2nd Edition). Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Seol, S-S and Park, J-M (2008) Knowledge sources of innovation studies in Korea: A citation analysis. Scientometrics 75(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Tsai, KH and Wang, JC (2005) Does R&D performance declines with the firm size? – A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy 34: 966–976.Google Scholar
Wong, P (2004) Snakes and ladders: A patent analysis of Ericsson, Motorola and Nokia in the mobile communications industry 1980-2000. International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC), 18-21 10, Singapore.Google Scholar
Wong, A and Schal, A (2002) An examination of the relationship between trust, commitment and relationship quality. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 30(1): 34–50.Google Scholar
World Bank (2003) East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wu, W (2007) Building research universities for knowledge transfer: The case of China. In How University Promotes Economic Growth, Yusuf, S and Nabeshima, K (Eds), World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Zhou, P and Leydesdorff, L (2006) The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy 35(1): 83–104.Google Scholar