Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:21:16.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dances of leadership: Bridging theory and practice through an aesthetic approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Arja Ropo  and
Erika Sauer
Arja Ropo
Affiliation:
Department of Mangement Studies, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
Erika Sauer
Affiliation:
Department of Management Studies, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We wish to develop the argument in this paper that through aesthetic and artistic work, practices and their metaphorical use, we have a potential to better understand the relationship between academic leadership theory and practical action. By aesthetic approach we mean the experiential way of knowing that emphasizes human senses and the corporeal nature of social interaction in leadership. In this paper, we discuss how leadership could look, sound and feel like when seen via the artistic metaphor of dance. We use the traditional dance, waltz and the postmodern dance experience of raves to illustrate our argument. By doing so, we challenge traditional, intellectually oriented and positivistic leadership approaches that hardly recognize nor conceptualize aesthetic, bodily aspects of social interaction between people in the workplace.

The ballroom dance waltz is used as a metaphorical representation of a hierarchical, logical and rational understanding of leadership. The waltz metaphor describes the leader as a dominant individual who knows where to go and the dance partner as a follower or at least as someone with a lesser role in defining the dance. Raves, on the other hand representparadigmatically different kind of a dance and therefore a different understanding of leadership. There are neither dance steps to learn, nor fixed dance partners where one leads and the other follows. Even the purpose or aim of dancing may not be known at the beginning of the dance, but it is negotiated as the raves go on. We think that raves describe the organizational life as it is often seen and felt today: chaotic, full of unexpected changes, ambiguous and changing collaborators in networks. Here leadership becomes a collective, distributed activity where the work processes and the targeted outcome is continually negotiated.

Through the dance metaphors of waltz and raves, we suggest aspects such as gaze, rhythm and space to give an aesthetic description both to a more traditional and an emerging aesthetic paradigm of leadership where the corporeality of leadership is emphasized. We wish to make the point that leadership is aesthetically and corporeally co-constructed both between the leader and the followers as well as between the researcher and the subjects. The metaphor of dance illustrates the corporeal nature of leadership both to practitioners and theoreticians.

Keywords

leadershipaestheticscorporealitymetaphordance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , November 2008 , pp. 560 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, NJ (2006) The Arts & Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do? Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4): 486–499.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M and Sveningsson, S (2003) The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing ‘leadership’. Leadership Quarterly 14: 359–381.Google Scholar
Bass, BM (1990) Bass and Stogdills Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Boje, D, Luhman, J, Cunliffe, A (2003) A Dialectic Perspective on the Organization Theatre Metaphor. American Communication Journal 6(2). Accessed at http://acjournal.org/holdings/vol6/iss2/articles/boje.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brewis, J, Linstead, S, Boje, D and O'Shea, T (2006) The Passion of Organizing. Liber, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brown, ME and Gioia, DA (2002) Making Things Click: Distributive Leadership in an Online Division of an Offline Organization. Leadership Quarterly 13(4): 397–419.Google Scholar
Bryman, A (1992) Charisma & Leadership in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Bryman, A (1996) Leadership in organizations. In Clegg, SR, Hardy, C and Nord, WR (Eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp 276–292. Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Bryman, A (2002) Qualitative Methods Special Series: Combining Distributed Leadership and Unit of Analysis Literatures. Editorial. Leadership Quarterly 13(4): 421.Google Scholar
Bryman, A (2003) Qualitative Methods Special Series: Casting Doubts on Leadership as a Valuable Construct: article. Editorial. Leadership Quarterly 14(3): 357.Google Scholar
Chiapello, E (1998) Artistes versus Managers. Broché, Paris.Google Scholar
Conger, JA and Kanungo, RN (1987) Towards a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review 12: 637–647.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, JP, Oswick, C, Christensen, LT, Phillips, N (2008) Metaphor in Organizational Research: Context, Modalities and Implications for Research Introduction. Organization Studies 29(1): 7–22.Google Scholar
Dachler, HP and Hosking, DM (1995) The Primacy of Relations in Socially Constructing Organizational Realities. In Hosking, DM, Dachler, HP and Gergen, KJ (eds) Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot UK, Avebury.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1967) Of other spaces. Heterotopias. Translated from French by Lecture, Miskowiec J. accessed at http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html on 15 February 2008.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P (1992) Symbols and artefacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Garret, L (1967) Visual Design: A problem solving approach. Robert E Krieger, Huntington NY.Google Scholar
Gronn, P (2002) Distributed Leadership as a Unit of Analysis. Leadership Quarterly 13(4): 423–451.Google Scholar
Hansen, H, Ropo, A and Sauer, E (2007) Aesthetic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly 18(6): 544–560.Google Scholar
Holger, L and Holmberg, I-L (2002) Identity – Trademarks, Logotypes and Symbols. National museum and Raster Förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Howell, JP and Costley, DL (2001) Understanding Behaviors for Effective Leadership. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ.Google Scholar
Hosking, DM (1999) Social construction as process: some new possibilities for research and development. Concepts and Transformation 4(2): 117–132.Google Scholar
Hunt, JG (2008) The Future is Now. In Barry, D and Hansen, H (eds) The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Hunt, JG and Ropo, A (2003) Longitudinal research and the third scientific discipline. Group and Organization Management 23(3): 315–340.Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (2006) Auditive Leadership Culture. Lessons from Symphony Orchestras. In Hosking, DM and McNamee, S (eds) The Social Construction of Organization, pp 91–111. Liber, Oslo.Google Scholar
Kotter, JP (1990) A Force for Change. How Leadership Differs from Management. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kouzes, JM and Posner, BZ (1993) Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.Google Scholar
Köping, A (2003) Den Bundna friheten. Om kreativitet och relationer i ett konserthus. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University, School of Business, Research Report 2003:7.Google Scholar
Ladkin, D and Taylor, S (2008) Enacting the ‵True Self': Towards a Theory of Embodied Authentic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly (in press).Google Scholar
Linstead, S and Höpfl, H (eds) (2000) The Aesthetics of Organization. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Meisiek, S (2007) Dissonances, awareness and aesthetization: theatre in a home care Organization. In de Monthoux, PG, Gustafsson, C, Sjöstrand, SE (eds) Aesthetic Leadership. Managing fields of flow in art and business. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M (1962) The phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
de Monthoux, PG, Gustafsson, C and Sjöstrand, SE (eds) Aesthetic Leadership. Managing fields of flow in art and business. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Paalumäki, A (2004) Keltaiselb johdetut. Artefaktit, johtaminen ja organisaation kulttuurinen identiteetti. Series A-5:2004. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J (1998) Bodies moving and moved. Tampere Finland, Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, CL and Conger, JA (eds) (2003) Shared leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Quinn, RE, Faerman, SR, Thompson, MP and McGrath, MR (1996) Becoming a Master Manager. A Competency Framework (2nd edn) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Quinn, RE, Faerman, SR, Thompson, MP, McGrath, MR and St Clair, LS (2007) Becoming a Master Manager. A Competing Values Framework (4th edn) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ramirez, R (1987) Towards an aesthetic theory of social organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Social Systems Science Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Ramirez, R (2005) The aesthetics of cooperation. European Management Review 2: 28–35.Google Scholar
Ropo, A and Parviainen, J (2001) Leadership and bodily knowledge in expert organizations: epistemological rethinking. Scandinavian Journal of Management 17: 1–18.Google Scholar
Ropo, A, Parviainen, J and Koivunen, N (2002) Aesthetics in leadership. From absent bodies to social bodily presence. In Meindl, J and Parry, K (Eds) Grounding leadership theory and research: Issues and perspectives. Information Age, Greenwich CT.Google Scholar
Ropo, A and Sauer, E (2003) Partnerships of Orchestras: Toward shared leadership. International Journal of Arts and Management 5(2): 44–55.Google Scholar
Ropo, A and Sauer, E (2008) Corporeal Leaders. In Barry, D and Hansen, H (eds) The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Saarikangas, K (2002) Asunnon muodonmuutoksia. Puhtauden estetiikka ja sukupuoli modernissa arkkitehtuurissa. SKS, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sauer, E (2005) Emotions in Leadership: Leading a Dramatic Ensemble. Tampere University Press, Tampere.Google Scholar
Soila-Wadman, M (2003) Kapitulationens estetik. Organisering och ledarskap i filmprojekt. Stockholm: Stockholm University, School of Business, Research Report 2003:4Google Scholar
Strati, A (1999) Organization and aesthetics. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, S (2002) Overcoming Aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational Members' Aesthetic experience. Human Relations 55(7): 821–840.Google Scholar
Zanetti, LA (2006) Fear of the female body in organizational contexts. In Brewis, J, Linstead, S, Boje, D and O'Shea, T, The Passion of Organizing. Liber, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Zerbe, WJ, Ashkanasy, NM and Härtel, CEJ (eds) (2006) Individual and Organizational Perspectives on Emotion Management and Display. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1947) The theory of social and economic organizations. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wennes, G (2002) Skjönnheten og udyret. Doktoral Dissertation. Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen.Google Scholar
Whetten, DA and Cameron, KS (1998) Developing Management Skills (4th edn) Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.Google Scholar
Yukl, G (2002) Leadership in Organizations (5th edn) Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, p 21.Google Scholar