Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:10:34.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A creative twist: Management theory, creativity and the Arts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Peter Gahan ,
Stella Minahan  and
Hilary Glow
Peter Gahan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Caulfield East VIC, Australia
Stella Minahan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Burwood VIC, Australia
Hilary Glow
Affiliation:
Bowater School of Management, Deakin University, Burwood VIC, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea that organizations need to adopt structures and practices that facilitate ‘creativity’ has become a central theme in theories of managing organisational innovation and success. This idea has been deployed in organisational theory, HRM, marketing and other domains of organization studies. For many theorists and practitioners in this area, organisational creativity is something to be distilled and managed as an element of organisational performance.

We argue, however, that this process of appropriation from the creative arts is subject to a number of problematic transitions. Our starting point is the notion of creativity itself. Within the creative arts, the question of what constitutes creativity and its relationship to artistic practice is subject to considerable debate. This debate centres on the question of whether creativity represents an essentialist and inexplicable (even spiritual) component of artistic practice or whether creativity is a trait of work and cannot be attributed as a unique aspect of art.

However it is defined, we argue that the notion of ‘creativity in business’ conveniently ignores essential elements of what constitutes creativity. In the process of being appropriated from the arts, the concept of creativity, we argue, has been ‘hollowed out’ and refashioned to suit the structures of organization as institution, and its needs as a business organization. This appropriated view of creativity has, in turn, been imposed on arts organisations, which are impelled to see themselves as ‘creative businesses’. In both cases, the mantra of creativity provides nothing more than a means to control individuals and provide them with a false hope that contributing to the success of business will provide a means to self fulfilment.

Keywords

critical theorymetaphordiscourse analysisorganizational efficiencypersonnel managementorganizational culture
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 41 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, RS (1990) Identity, Experiences, and Career Choice Among the Exceptionally Gifted and Eminent, in Runco, MA & Albert, RS (Eds) Theories of Creativity, pp. 13–34, Sage, Newbury Park CA.Google Scholar
Albrecht, K (1987) The Creative Corporation, Irwin, Homewood, Ill.Google Scholar
Alland, A (1977) The Artistic Animal: An Inquiry into the Biological Roots of Art, Anchor Press, New York.Google Scholar
Amabile, T (1998) How to Kill Creativity, Harvard Business Review, 76(5): 76–88.Google Scholar
Amabile, T, Conti, R, Coon, H, Lazenby, J and Herron, M (1996) Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1154–1184.Google Scholar
Archer, R (2005) The Myth of the Mainstream, Platform Papers, No. 4 April, Currency House, Strawberry Hills NSW.Google Scholar
Australia Council (2000) Selling the Performing Arts, Australia Council, Sydney.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P (1993) The Field of Cultural Production, Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cameron, J (1992) The Artist's Way: A Spiritual Path to Higher Creativity, Putnam, New York.Google Scholar
Dacey, JS and Lennon, KH (1998) Understanding Creativity: the Interplay of Biological, Psychological and Social Factors, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Dennis, N and Macauley, M (2003) Jazz and the Marketing Plan, Journal of Strategic Marketing 11: 177–185.Google Scholar
Department of Communications and the Arts (DOCA) (1994) Creative Nation, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Drazin, R, Glynn, MA and Kazanjian, RK (2000) Purpose-Built Theory: A Reply to Ford, Academy of Management Review 25(2): 285–287.Google Scholar
Drazin, R, Glynn, MA and Kazanjian, RK (1999) Multilevel Theorising About Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective, Academy of Management Review 24(2): 286–307.Google Scholar
Emerson, RW (1990) ‘The Poet’ in Essays, First and Second Series, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
Faas, M (2000) Playfully to the Essentials, in Fielder, J and Feirabend, P (Eds) Bauhaus, pp. 252–255, Kohnemann, Cologne.Google Scholar
Farmer, SM, Tierney, P and Kung-Mcintyre, K (2003) Employee Creativity in Taiwan: An Application of Role Identity Theory, Academy of Management Journal 46(5): 618–630.Google Scholar
Feist, G J (1998) A Meta-analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity, Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(4): 290–309.Google Scholar
Feurer, R, Chaharbaghi, K and Wargin, J (1996) Developing Creative Teams. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 16: 5–18.Google Scholar
Fillis, I and McAuley, A (2000) Modelling and Measuring Creativity at the Interface, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 8(2): 8–17.Google Scholar
Ford, CM (1996) A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains, Academy of Management Review 21(4): 1112–1142.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1972) The Order of Things, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
Furedi, F (1994) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Continuum Press, London.Google Scholar
Goswami, A (1996) Creativity and the Quantum: A Unified Theory of Creativity, Creativity Research Journal 9(1): 47–61.Google Scholar
Gotshalk, DW (1962) Art and the Social Order, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Guillet de Monthoux, P (2004) The Art Firm, Stanford University Press, California.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E (2002) The Demon and the Angel: Searching for the Source of Artistic Inspiration, Harvest, Orlando FL.Google Scholar
Hooks, B (1995) Art on MY Mind: Visual Politics, The New Press, New York.Google Scholar
Horne, D (2002) The Arts, the Regions and the Economy, Artwork Magazine 54 (12): 1–5.Google Scholar
Jeanes, E L (2006) Resisting Creativity, Creating the New: A Deluzian Perspective on Creativity, Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 127–134.Google Scholar
Kamoche, K and Pina e Cunha, M (2001) Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation, Organization Studies 22(5): 733–764.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, D, O'Brien, C and Linnane, M (2002) Art, Work and Art Work, Creativity and Innovation Management 11: 277–286.Google Scholar
Keenoy, T (1999) HRM as Hologram: A Polemic, Journal of Management Studies 36(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
King, N and Anderson, N (1990) ‘Innovation in working groups’ in West, MA and Farr, JL (Eds) Innovation and Creativity at Work, pp. 81–100, Wiley, Chester.Google Scholar
Latham, C (2004) Survival of the Fittest: The Artist versus the Corporate World, Platform Papers No. 2 10, Currency House, Strawberry Hills NSW.Google Scholar
Levitt, T (2002) Creativity is Not Enough, Harvard Business Review 80(8): 137–144.Google Scholar
Mayakovsky, V (1970) How Are Verses Made? Jonathan Cape, London [original published in Russian 1926].Google Scholar
Lubart, TI (2001–2002) Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future, Creativity Research Journal 13(3–4): 295–308.Google Scholar
Minahan, S and Hartel, C (2005) Creativity, Celebration and Play, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 10(4): 249–261.Google Scholar
Morgan, G (1997) Images of Organization, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Mumford, MD and Gustafson, SB (1988) Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application and Innovation, Psychological Bulletin 103: 27–43.Google Scholar
Niu, W and Sternberg, RJ (2001) Cultural Influences on Artistic Creativity and its Evaluation, International Journal of Psychology 36(4): 225–241.Google Scholar
Oldham, GR and Cummings, A (1996) Employee Creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work, Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 607–634.Google Scholar
Osborne, T (2003) Against ‘creativity’: A Philistine Rant, Economy and Society 32: 507–525.Google Scholar
Oswick, C, Keenoy, T and Grant, D (2002) Metaphor and Analogical Reasoning in Organization Theory: Beyond Orthodoxy, Academy of Management Review 27(22): 294–303.Google Scholar
Prichard, C (2002) Creative Selves? Critically Reading ‘Creativity’ in Management Discourse, Creativity & Innovation Management 11(4): 265–277.Google Scholar
Scanlon, C (2005) The Cult of Creativity, The Age Review, 5 02 2005.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, TS (2006) The Psychology of Novelty Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work–Psychological Perspective, Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 164–172.Google Scholar
Shapiro, P and Weisberg, R (1999) Creativity and Bipolar Diathesis: Common Behavioural and Cognitive Components, Cognition & Emotion 13(6): 741–762.Google Scholar
Sternberg, RJ (1999) A Propulsion Model of Types of Creative Contributions, Review of General Psychology 3: 83–100.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D (2000) Art and Organisation: Making Australian Cultural Policy, University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Strati, A (2000) Putting People in the Picture: Art and Aesthetics in Photography and in Understanding Organisational Life, Organization Studies 21(1): 53–69.Google Scholar
Summers, and White, (1976) Creativity Techniques: Towards and Improvement of the Decision Process, Academy of Management Review 1(2): 99–107.Google Scholar
Taggar, S (2002) Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model, Academy of Management Journal 45(2): 315–330.Google Scholar
Thomas, P (2003) The Recontextualization of Management: A Discourse-based Approach to Analysing the Development of Management Thinking, Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 775–801.Google Scholar
Thomas, V (1958) Creativity in Art, The Philosophical Review 67(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Thompson, L and Brajkovich, L F (2003) Improving the Creativity of Organizational Work Groups, Academy of Management Executive 17(1): 96–109.Google Scholar
Throsby, D and Hollister, V (2003) Don't Give Up Your Day Job: An Economic Study of Professional Artists in Australia, Australia Council for the Arts, Sydney.Google Scholar
Torrance, P (1988) The Nature of Creativity as Manifest in testing, in Sternberg, RJ (Ed.) The Nature of Creativity, pp. 43–75, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K (2001) Unpacking Creativity, Academy of Management Review 26(2): 289–297.Google Scholar
Wolff, J (1980) The Social Production of Art, St Martins Press, New York.Google Scholar
Woodman, RW, Sawyer, JE and Griffin, RW (1993) Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity, Academy of Management Review 24(2): 293–321.Google Scholar