Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:48:41.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chameleons at large: Entrepreneurs, employees and firms – the changing context of employment relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

Michael T Wynn
Michael T Wynn*
Affiliation:
Kingston Law School, Kingston University, Kingston Hill, Kingston on Thames, Surrey, UK
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current labour markets are witnessing a proliferation of hybrid or quasi-employment status whereby company directors and limited liability partners are gaining access to employment rights. At the same time, legislation is creating new forms of employee shareholder status, where employees trade employment rights for shares in the company. New corporate structures are being developed to promote one-man companies, small and medium sized enterprises and hybrid company/partnerships. This paper examines some of these developments in the light of the theory of the firm and the jurisprudence of company and employment law and considers the implications for workers, employers and the self-employed.

Keywords

employeeentrepreneurfirmemployment status
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 22 , Special Issue 6: Self-employed professionals, freelancers and contractors , November 2016 , pp. 826 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, P., & Holden, R. (2011). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm: What have we learned over the past 25 years? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 181–197.Google Scholar
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10, 7–24.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). Political economy of the sovereign debt crisis: The limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41, 254–275.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98.5(part 1), 893–921.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labour Economics, 16, 26–60.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Burchell, B., Deakin, S., & Honey, S. (1999). The employment status of workers in non standard employment. EMAR Research Series 6 Department of Trade and Industry, London.Google Scholar
Carree, M., & Thurik, A. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D. Audretsch, & J. Zoltan (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (p. 437). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Casson, M. (2003). The entrepreneur, an economic theory. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. (1997). Company law: theory, structure and operation . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2001). Regulating the employment relation for competitiveness. Industrial Law Journal, 30, 1–31.Google Scholar
Davies, P., & Worthington, S. (2012). Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law (9th ed.) London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., & Morris, G. (2012). Labour law (6th ed.) Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., & Wilkinson, F. (2005). The law of the labour market, industrialisation, employment and legal evolution. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (2011). RH coase and the neoclassical model of the economic system. Journal of Law and Economics, 54, S7–S13.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: work, power and trust relations. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Freedland, M. (2003). The personal employment contract. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Freedland, M., & Kountouris, N. (2008). Towards a comparative theory of the construction of personal work relationships in Europe. Industrial Law Journal, 37, 49–74.Google Scholar
Garson, G. (1977). Models of worker self- management: The West European experience. In G. Garson (Ed.), Worker self – management in industry: The West European experience. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hamren, K. (2014). Closing the entrepreneurial gap: Liberalising employment law to restore French competitiveness. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 34(3), 519.Google Scholar
Henrekson, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and institutions. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 28, 717–742.Google Scholar
Hepple, B. (1986). Restructuring employment rights. Industrial Law Journal, 15, 69–89.Google Scholar
Hoge, T. (2011). Perceived flexibility requirements at work and the entreployee-work-orientation: Concept and measurement. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 4, 1.Google Scholar
Howell, C. (2000). Saloman under attack. Company Law, 21, 312–314.Google Scholar
Howell, C. (2008). When is a majority shareholder an employee: a consideration of Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd. Journal of Business Law, 8, 778–784.Google Scholar
Howse, R., & Trebilcock, M. (1993). Protecting the employment bargain. University of Toronto Law Journal, 43, 751–792.Google Scholar
Hvide, H. (2009). The quality of entrepreneurs. Economic Journal, 119, 1010–1035.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O. (1944). Some reflections on company law reform. Modern Law Review, 7(1/2), 54–66.Google Scholar
Kose, J., Knyazeva, A., & Knyazeva, D. (2015). Employee rights and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 118, 49–69.Google Scholar
Kruse, D. (2002). Research evidence on prevalence and effects of employee ownership, Paper to Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations, Committee on Education and the Workforce, US House of Representatives, February, 2002.Google Scholar
Lawrence French, J. (1987). Employee perspectives on stock ownership: Financial investment or mechanism of control? The Academy of Management Review, 12, 427–435.Google Scholar
Lazear, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labour Economics, 23, 649–680.Google Scholar
Leighton, P., & Wynn, M. (2011). Classifying employment relationships – more sliding doors or a better regulatory framework. Industrial Law Journal, 40, 5–44.Google Scholar
Licht, A. (2007). The entrepreneurial spirit and what the law can do about it. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 28, 817.Google Scholar
Logue, J., & Yates, J. (2001). The real world of employee ownership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, S. (2006). Law and economics of entrepreneurship. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 28, 695.Google Scholar
Pendleton, A. (2010). Employee share ownership and investment concentration: Which employee shareholders fail to diversify? Human Resource Management Journal, 20, 157–174.Google Scholar
Pendleton, A., Wilson, N., & Wright, M. (1998). The perception and effects of share ownership: Empirical evidence from employee buy-outs. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36, 99–123.Google Scholar
Pissarides, C. (2010). Why do firms offer employment protection? Economica, 77, 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pongratz, H. J., & Voss, G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: Towards a ‘self- entrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation, 8(3), 239–254.Google Scholar
Poole, M., & Jenkins, G. (2013). The impact of economic democracy: Profit-sharing and employee shareholding schemes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prassl, J. (2013). Employee shareholder status: Dismantling the contract of employment. Industrial Law Journal, 42, 307–337.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. (Translated by R. Opie 65–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.Google Scholar
Tolmie, F. (1997). Can controlling shareholders be employees as well? Law Quarterly Review, 113, 536–540.Google Scholar
Voss and Pongratz (1998). Der Arbeitskraftunternehmer. Eine neue Grundform der ‘Ware Arbeitskaft’? Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50, 131–158.Google Scholar
Walton, M. (2016). The shifting nature of work and its implications. Industrial Law Journal, 45, 111–130.Google Scholar
Wardman, K. (2003). Directors and employee status: An examination of relevant company law and employment law principles. Company Lawyer, 24, 139–143.Google Scholar
Wynn, M., & Leighton, P. (2009). Agency workers, employment rights and the ebb and flow of freedom of contract. Modern Law Review, 72, 91–102.Google Scholar