Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T06:19:55.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Training and maintaining autonomy-supportive supervisory style in low-skilled occupations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2019

Amy Yong Open the ORCID record for Amy Yong [Opens in a new window] ,
Maree Roche  and
Anna Sutton
Amy Yong*
Affiliation:
Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Maree Roche
Affiliation:
Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Anna Sutton
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to self-determination theory, employees' well-being is related to the autonomy-supportive style of a supervisor. However, the effect of supervision style on well-being remains understudied in low-skilled occupations. This study employed a mixed-method, multi-level approach to examine the impact of autonomy-supportive training (AST) on supervisors and employees and to identify factors contributing to the maintenance of supervisors' autonomy support (SAS). The quantitative phase evaluated the effect of AST on supervisory style and employees' well-being, with a sample of 44 supervisors and 240 employees in New Zealand. The qualitative phase used focus groups and interview with 15 supervisors to explore factors that could influence the maintenance of SAS. Overall, supervisors can be trained to adopt an autonomy-supportive style, but these skills can also be diluted by organisational factors such as pressures and managerial behaviour. This study contributes to autonomy-supportive style research in order to account for factors affecting the maintenance of SAS in low-skilled occupations.

Keywords

training and developmentleadership developmentmixed methodsorganisational climatewell-being and psychosocial risk factors
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 2023 , pp. 326 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., & Haerens, L. (2016). Changing teachers’ beliefs regarding autonomy support and structure: The role of experienced psychological need satisfaction in teacher training. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 64–72. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariza-Montes, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Han, H., & Law, R. (2018). Work environment and well-being of different occupational groups in hospitality: Job Demand–Control–Support model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 73, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Blume, B. D. (2017). The state of transfer of training research: Moving toward more consumer-centric inquiry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(1), 17–28. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459–1473. doi:10.1177/0146167211413125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beenen, G., Pichler, S., & Levy, P. E. (2017). Self-determined feedback seeking: The role of perceived supervisor autonomy support. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 555–569. doi:10.1002/hrm.21787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, C., Koch, T., Clasen, J., Winkler, E., & Vowinkel, J. (2017). Evaluation of an organizational health intervention for low-skilled workers and immigrants. Human Relations, 70(8), 994–1016. doi:10.1177/0018726716682308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, C., Staar, H., Åborg, C., Roscher, S., & Ducki, A. (2010). The neglected employees: Work-life balance and a stress management intervention program for low-qualified workers. In Houdmont, J. & Leka, S. (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 98–123). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B. W., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., … Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheon, S. H., Moon, I. S., & Reeve, J. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(3), 365–396. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.3.365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331–346. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiaburu, D. S., Van Dam, K., & Hutchins, H. M. (2010). Social support in the workplace and training transfer: A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 187–200. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00500.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirkov, V. I. (2011). Human psychological autonomy: Reflections on the debates about its understanding in modern psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(9), 609–620. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00380.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). From the editors: Publishing in AMJ: Topic choice. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/stable/23045090Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942. doi:10.1177/0146167201278002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 642–650. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Speigel, N. H., & Ryan, R. M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(6), 852–859. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elo, A.-L., Ervasti, J., Kuosma, E., & Mattila-Holappa, P. (2014). Effect of a leadership intervention on subordinate well-being. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 182–195. doi:10.1108/JMD-11-2012-0146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güntert, S. (2015). The impact of work design, autonomy support, and strategy on employee outcomes: A differentiated perspective on self-determination at work. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 74–87. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9412-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardré, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2009). Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(3), 165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00325.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399. doi:10.2307/20159480Google Scholar
Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1), 73–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1789–1805. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01066.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179–202. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joussemet, M., Mageau, G. A., & Koestner, R. (2014). Promoting optimal parenting and children's mental health: A preliminary evaluation of the how-to parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(6), 949–964. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9751-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2012). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühnel, J., Sonnentag, S., & Bledow, R. (2012). Resources and time pressure as day-level antecedents of work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 181–198. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02022.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langan, E., Blake, C., Toner, J., & Lonsdale, C. (2015). Testing the effects of a self-determination theory-based intervention with youth Gaelic football coaches on athlete motivation and burnout. The Sport Psychologist, 29(4), 293. doi:10.1123/tsp.2013-0107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, V., Martina, C. A., McDermott, M. P., Trief, P., Goodman, S. R., Morse, G. D., … Ryan, R. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of mentoring interventions for underrepresented minorities. Academic Medicine, 91(7), 994–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonsdale, C., Hall, A. M., Murray, A., Williams, G. C., McDonough, S. M., Ntoumanis, N., … Kolt, G. S. (2017). Communication skills training for practitioners to increase patient adherence to home-based rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(9), 1732-1743. e1737. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 325–357. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01246.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment. (2018). Beyond commodities: Manufacturing into the future. Retrieved from https://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/sectors-industries/sectors-reports-series/pdf-image-library/manufacturing-report-2018/manufacturing-sector-report-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A., Hall, A., Williams, G., McDonough, S., Ntoumanis, N., Taylor, I., … Lonsdale, C. (2015). Effect of a self-determination theory-based communication skills training program on physiotherapists’ psychological support for their patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(5), 809–816. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olesen, M. H. (2011). General causality orientations are distinct from but related to dispositional traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 460–465. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostlander, J., Güntert, S., & Wehner, T. (2014). Linking autonomy-supportive leadership to volunteer satisfaction: A self-determination theory perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1368–1387. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9395-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2014). An intervention-based program of research on teachers’ motivating styles. In Karabenick, S. A. & Urdan, T. C. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp. 293–339). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133–147. doi:10.1177/1523422318756954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. P., Ryan, R. M., Niemiec, C. P., Legate, N., & Williams, G. C. (2015). Mindfulness, work climate, and psychological need satisfaction in employee well-being. Mindfulness, 6(5), 971–985. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0338-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724. doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9698-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenling, A., & Tafvelin, S. (2016). Transfer of training after an organizational intervention in Swedish sports clubs: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(5), 493–504. doi:10.1123/jsep.2016-0084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Twisk, J. (2006). Applied multilevel analysis: A practical guide for medical researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. (2018). Job openings and labor turnover – July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/jolts.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vidyarthi, P. R., Erdogan, B., Anand, S., Liden, R. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2014). One member, two leaders: Extending leader–member exchange theory to a dual leadership context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 468–483. doi:10.1037/a0035466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellings, K., Branigan, P., & Mitchell, K. (2000). Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: Using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(3), 255–267. doi:10.1080/136910500422241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, D. (2017). Autonomy in paid work and employee subjective well-being. Work and Occupations, 44(3), 296–328. doi:10.1177/0730888417697232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 115–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkler, E., Busch, C., Clasen, J., & Vowinkel, J. (2014). Leadership behavior as a health-promoting resource for workers in low-skilled jobs and the moderating role of power distance orientation. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28(1/2), 96–116.Google Scholar
Winkler, E., Busch, C., Clasen, J., & Vowinkel, J. (2015). Changes in leadership behaviors predict changes in job satisfaction and well-being in low-skilled workers: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 72–87. doi:10.1177/1548051814527771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, A., Roche, M., & Sutton, A. (2019). Supervisory skills training for the neglected supervisors: Development and preliminary evaluation of an autonomy-supportive programme. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(5), 315–326. doi:10.1108/ICT-01-2019-0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, R. A. (1993). Focus group research on sensitive topics: Setting the agenda without setting the agenda. In Morgan, D. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the Art. (pp.167–183) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar