Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:12:41.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organisational sequestering of workplace bullying: Adding insult to injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Alison Thirlwall*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper explores empirical data from human resources practitioners and employees to define the ways in which organisations respond to complaints about workplace bullying in New Zealand. Despite recommendations that organisations take workplace bullying seriously and increasing research in recent years, little evidence exists of improvements in the management of this problem. Indeed, this study adds to the gloom by providing an account of the ways in which a group of organisations failed to take responsibility for the welfare of their employees and members. A selection of disappointing responses to requests for help, and some possible explanations for these responses, is presented. Crucially, a set of terms for identifying organisational inaction towards full resolution of workplace bullying is introduced, resolving some aspects of denotative hesitancy in this area. Defining the approaches that hinder resolution of workplace bullying may contribute to its reduction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, K. (2012). ‘She’ll be right’ attitude blamed. Retrieved from http://www.christchurchstar.co.nz/news/shell-be-right-attitude-blamed/1441080/Google Scholar
Bentley, T., Catley, B., Cooper-Thomas, H., Gardener, D., O’Driscoll, M. & Trenberth, L. (2009). Understanding stress and bullying in New Zealand workplaces. Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University.Google Scholar
Bilgel, N., Aytac, S. & Bayram, N. (2006). Bullying in Turkish white-collar workers. Occupational Medicine, 56, 226231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, V., Korczynski, M. & Cohen, L. (2005). The invisibility of violence: Constructing violence out of the jobcentre workplace in the UK. Work, Employment & Society, 19, 583602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchflower, D. G. (2007). International patterns of union membership. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(1), 128.Google Scholar
Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1223.Google Scholar
Branch, S., Ramsey, S. & Barker, M. (2006). Causes of upward bullying: Managers’ perspectives. Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference (ANZAM), pp. 1–17, Rockhampton.Google Scholar
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, K. & Mulder, J. G. (1999). English in Australia and New Zealand: An introduction to its history, structure and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clair, R. P. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizatational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communcation Monographs, 60, 113136.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. L. (2011). ‘Yes, we have and anti-bullying policy, but…:’ HR professionals’ understandings and experiences with workplace bullying policy. Communcation Studies, 62(3), 307327.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. L. (2012). It’s complicated: Defining workplace bullying from the human resource professional’s perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 377403.Google Scholar
Davenport, N., Schwartz, R. D. & Elliott, G. P. (1999). Mobbing – emotional abuse in the American workplace. Ames: Civil Society.Google Scholar
D’Cruz, P. (2012). Workplace bullying in India. Abingdon/New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
D’Cruz, P. & Noronha, E. (2010). Protecting my interests: HRM and targets’ coping with workplace bullying. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 507534.Google Scholar
Djurkovic, N., McCormack, D. & Casimir, G. (2008). Workplace bullying and intention to leave: The moderating effect of perceived organisational support. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(4), 405422.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 114.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (2nd ed., pp. 339). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, I. (2012). She’ll be right won’t work in earthquake. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/7230723/Google Scholar
Ferris, P. (2004). A preliminary typology of organizational response to allegations of workplace bullying: See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(3), 389395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, T. (1996). Bully in sight. Oxfordshire: Wessex Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, K. (1997). Locating frames in the discursive universe. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/4.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 2138.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harrington, S., Rayner, C. & Warren, S. (2012). Too hot to handle? Trust and human resource practitioners’ implementation of anti-bullying policy. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 392408.Google Scholar
Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empiricalissues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85117.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2000). An analysis of workplace bullying in the UK. Personnel Review, 29(5), 593.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2001). Perceptions of bullying in organizations. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2(1), 4864.Google Scholar
Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165184.Google Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2003). The communicative cycle of employee emotional abuse. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 471501.Google Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P. & Tracy, S. J. (2012). Answering five key questions about workplace bullying: How communication scholarship provides thought leadership for transforming abuse at work. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 347.Google Scholar
Namie, G. & Namie, R. (2000). The bully at work. Naperville: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar
Needham, A. W. (2003). Workplace bullying – The costly business secret. Auckland: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. B. & Einarsen, S. (2008). Sampling in research on interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 34, 265272.Google ScholarPubMed
Oakley, A. (1988). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 3061). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Z. (2005). Researching real world problems. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 318, 228232.Google Scholar
Randall, P. (1997). Adult bullying. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (2000). They have a word for it: A lighthearted lexicon of untranslatable words and phrases (The Writer’s Studio). Louisville: Sarabande Books.Google Scholar
Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 12131232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salin, D. (2009). Organisational responses to workplace harassment. Personnel Review, 38(1), 2644.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. (2011). Workplace bullying in New Zealand Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics. Thesis. University of Waikato, Hamiton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. & Haar, J. (2010). Bullying in New Zealand: Comparing NAQ findings to USA and European studies. New Zealand Journal of Human Resources Management, 10(2), 99115.Google Scholar
Vartia, M. & Leka, S. (2011). Interventions for the prevention and management of bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp 359379). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Visser, J. (2006). Union membership statistics in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review, 3849.Google Scholar
Woodrow, C. & Guest, D. E. (2014). When good HR gets bad results: Exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of worplace bullying. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 3856.Google Scholar
Worksafe New Zealand (2014). Preventing and responding to workplace bullying: Best practice guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/bullying-guidelines/workplace-bullyingGoogle Scholar
Yamada, D. (2010). Workplace Bullying and the Law, 2000–2010: A Global Assessment. 7th International Conference on Bullying and Harassment at Work. Cardiff: University of Glamorgan.Google Scholar
Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational, workgroup related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 7085.Google Scholar
Zapf, D., Knorz, C. & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215237.Google Scholar