Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:29:48.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Company Rules, Ethical Climate, and Individual Characteristics on Sales Representative's Honesty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2016

Steven L. Grover  and
Cathy A. Enz
Steven L. Grover
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, Phone: +64 3 479 8542, Fax: +64 3 4 79 8173, Email: [email protected]
Cathy A. Enz
Affiliation:
School of Hospitality Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A., Phone: +1 607 255 8841, Fax: +1 607 254 6787, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the impact of situational and individual characteristics on sales representatives' propensity to lie or to tell the truth. The situational elements were the honesty of the organisation climate and its formal rules about lying to customers. The individual elements were the participants' degree of Machiavellianism and tolerance for ambiguity. The results indicated that more Machiavellian people were more likely to lie and that they were less guided by the rules than people who were low in this trait. In addition, rules and climate work together for people with a high tolerance for ambiguity in a complex manner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 2005 , pp. 27 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, K. 1998. The effects of ethical climate and the availability of alternatives on the use of deception during negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(3): 195–217.Google Scholar
Boles, T. L., Croson, R. T. A., & Murnighan, J. K. 2000. Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83: 235–259.Google Scholar
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cressey, D. R., & Moore, C. A. 1983. Managerial values and corporate codes of ethics. California Management Review, 25(4): 53–77.10.2307/41165032Google Scholar
Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Victor, B. 2003. The effects of ethical climates on organizational commitment: A two-study analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2): 127–141.10.1023/A:1025089819456Google Scholar
Enz, C. A. 1988. The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2): 284–304.Google Scholar
Forte, A. 2004. Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2): 167–173.10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033610.35181.efGoogle Scholar
Fritsche, D. J. 2000. Ethical climates and the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2): 125–140.Google Scholar
Geis, F. L., & Moon, T. H. 1982. Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41(4): 766–775.Google Scholar
Giacalone, J. R., & Knouse, S. G. 1990. Justifying wrongful employee behaviour: The role of personality in organisational sabotage. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 55–61.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L. 1993a. Lying, deceit and subterfuge: a model of dishonesty in the workplace. Organization Science, 4(3): 478–495.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L. 1993b. Why professionals lie: The impact of professional role conflict on reporting accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 251–272.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L. 2005. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: The causes and management of workplace lying. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2): 148–157.Google Scholar
Grover, S. L., & Hui, C. 1994. The influence of role conflict, role strength, and reward contingencies on lying behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 295–303.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. 1928. Studies in the nature of character. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. 1978. Some determinants of unethical decision behaviour: An experiement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4): 451–457.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research: 347–480. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Martin, J. G., & Westie, F. R. 1959. Intolerance of ambiguity scale in “The tolerant personality.” American Sociological Review, 24: 521–528.Google Scholar
O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. 1981. Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communication Research, 7(4): 325–339.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. K. 2002. The relationship between unethical behavior and the dimensions of the ethical climate questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4): 313–326.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. C., & Rymon, T. 2001. Purchasing agents' deceptive behavior: A randomized response technique study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3): 455–479.Google Scholar
Ross, W. T., & Robertson, D. C. 2000. Lying: The impact of decision context. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2): 409–440.Google Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2): 224–253.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climate: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28: 447–479.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L., & Douma, B. 2004. The role of goal setting in motivating unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3).Google Scholar
Stone, R. W., & Henry, J. W. 2003. Identifying and developing measures of information technology ethical work climates. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4): 337–350.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601–617.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. 2001. The ethical context in organizations: Influences of employee attitudes and behaviors. In Dienhart, J., Moberg, D. & Duska, R. (Eds.), The next phase of business ethics: integrating psychology and ethics. New York: JAI.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. 1990. Bad applies in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 378–385.Google Scholar
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. 1988. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1): 101–125.Google Scholar
Weber, J., & Seger, J. E. 2002. Influences upon organizational ethical subclimates: A replication study of a single firm at two points in time. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1–2): 69–84.Google Scholar