Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:43:09.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entrepreneurial and management teams: What makes the difference?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Sanna Huovinen  and
Mika Pasanen
Sanna Huovinen
Affiliation:
Association for Finnish Work, Helsinki, Finland
Mika Pasanen
Affiliation:
Department of Business & Management, University of Kuopio, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of teams has been largely recognized in recent management and entrepreneurship research. This article critically reviews the literature of entrepreneurial and management teams by comparing the key concepts, and the development and foci of research from the SME performance viewpoint in particular. The comparison reveals that entrepreneurial teams differ from management teams, and so the concepts should not be considered interchangeable. Such teams also operate largely in different contexts, however, both having different roles for management and a significant impact on firm performance. Moreover, the review suggests that entrepreneurial and management teams are often groups rather than teams and they are more common than previously believed, though there is much variation in their prevalence by industry sector and firm size.

Keywords

teamsentrepreneurial teamsmanagement teamsperformancesmall and medium enterprises
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 436 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bantel, K. A. & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management innovations in banking: does the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.Google Scholar
Bantel, K. A. (1993). Top team environment, and performance effects on strategic planning formality. Group and Organization Studies, 18, 436–458.Google Scholar
Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial Behaviour. Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview, IL.Google Scholar
Birley, S. & Stockley, S. (2000). Entrepreneurial teams and venture growth, in Sexton, D. & Landstrôm, H. (eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 287–307.Google Scholar
Bouncken, R. B. (2004). Cultural diversity in entrepreneurial teams: findings of new ventures Sanna Huovinen and Mika Pasanen in Germany. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 240–54.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1997). Team-based working. Committee for Public Management Research Discussion Paper 4: http://www.cpmr.gov.ie/CPMRDiscussionPapers/paper4.doc.Google Scholar
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur. Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarysse, B. & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. G. & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.Google Scholar
Cooney, T. (2005). What is an entrepreneurial team? International Small Business Journal, 23(3), 226–235.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. C. & Bruno, A. (1977). Success among high technology firms. Business Horizons, 20(2), 16–22.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. & Daily, C. (1996). Entrepreneurial teams. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. & Daily, C. (1997). Entrepreneurial teams, in Sexton, D. & Smilor, R. (eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000, Upstart, Chicago, pp. 127–150.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. C., Dunkelberg, W. C., Woo, C. Y., & Dennis, W. J. (1990). New business in America: the firms and their owners. National Foundation of Independent Businesses, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cyr, L. A., Johnson, D. E. & Welbourne, T. M. (2000). Human resources in initial public offering firms: do venture capitalists make a difference? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, 77–91.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational Growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures (1978-1988). Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529.Google Scholar
Eisenstat, R. & Cohen, S. (1990). Top management groups, in Hackman, J.R. (1990) (ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't): creating conditions for effective teamwork, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 78–86.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (1998). The effects of entrepreneurial team skill heterogeneity and functional diversity on new venture performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Carland, J. C. & Carland, J. W. (2000). Investigating the existence of the lead entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 59–77.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Carland, J. C., Carland, J. W. & Banks, M. (1999). Exploring the existence of entrepreneurial teams. International Journal of Management, 16(2), 276–86.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D. & Pearson, A. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 05, 267–284.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W. & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams. Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365–386.Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W. & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: a theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 329–346.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. West, St Paul, MO.Google Scholar
Francis, D. H. & Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 5–26.Google Scholar
Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Gatewood, E. & Katz, J. A. (1994). Finding the entrepreneur in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring, 5–9.Google Scholar
Gaskill, L., van Auken, H. & Manning, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(4), 18–31.Google Scholar
Ghosh, B. & Kwan, W. (1996). An analysis of key success factors of SMEs: a comparative study of Singapore/Malaysia and Australia/New Zealand, in the 41st ICSB WorldConference Proceedings I, 215–252. Stockholm, Sweden, 06 16-19.Google Scholar
Ghosh, B. C., Liang, T. W., Meng, T. T. & Chen, B. (2001). The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Business Research, 51, 209–221.Google Scholar
Glunk, U., Heijltjes, M. G. & Olie, R. (2001). Design characteristics and functioning of top management teams in Europe. European Management Journal, 19(3), 291–300.Google Scholar
Grant, A. J. (1993). Founding entrepreneur leadership persistence practices in high-growth ventures. Paper presented at Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Houston, 03 24-7.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. (1984). Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: a conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 399–412.Google Scholar
Guzzo, R. A. & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Reviews Psychology, 47, 307–338.Google Scholar
Hall, G. & Young, B. (1991). Factors associated with insolvency amongst small firms. International Small Business Journal, 9(2), 54–63.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management team. California Management Review, 37(3), 110–126.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organisational growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(4), 7–19.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. T. & Leitch, C. M. (1995). Team entrepreneurship and new venture growth: strategy, impact and policy, in Leavy, B. & Walsh, J. S. (eds.), Strategy and General Management, Oak Tree Press, Dublin, pp. 274–296.Google Scholar
Hart, E. (1996). Top teams. Management Review, 85(2), 43–47.Google Scholar
Haswell, S. & Holmes, S. (1989). Estimating the small business failure rate: a reappraisal. Journal of Small Business Management, 27, 68–74.Google Scholar
Kamm, J. B. & Aldrich, H. E. (1991). Differences in network activity between entrepreneurial individuals and teams. Paper presented at Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Pittsburgh, 04 17-20.Google Scholar
Kamm, J. B., Schuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A. & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7–17.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J. R. (1997). The myth of the top management team. Harvard Business Review, 11-Dec, 83–91.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J. R. (1998). Teams at the top: unleashing the potential of both teams and individual leaders. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993a). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 03-April, 71(2), 111–120.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D. (1993b). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organisation. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Keck, S. L. (1997). Top management team structure: different effectives by environmental context. Organization Science, 8(2), 143–156.Google Scholar
Keck, S. L. (1998). Problems on multinational teams in turbulent conditions, in the Internet: www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/1998/sribr/98sri196.txt.Google Scholar
Keck, S. L. & Tushman, M. (1993). Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1314–1344.Google Scholar
Kor, Y. Y. & Mahoney, J. T. (2000). Penrose's resource-based approach: the process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 109–139.Google Scholar
Lau, D. (2000). Incubators bound in the land of internet deals. Venture Capital Journal, 1, 1.Google Scholar
Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: a determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 263–278.Google Scholar
Lester, D. L., Parnell, J. A. & Frey, L. (2002). Top management teams' (small business managers') influence on organizational life cycle, in the Internet: http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/Research/2002/ASBE/papers/02asbe060.pdf.Google Scholar
Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Lohrke, F. T., Franklin, G., McClure, K., Vinay, B. & Austin, S. F. (1999). Top management international orientation and small business exporting performance: the moderating roles of export market and industry factors, in the Internet: www.sbaer.uca.edu/Research/1999/SBIDA/99sbi002.htm.Google Scholar
Longenecker, C. O. (2001). Building high performance management teams. Industrial Management, 43(6), 21–26.Google Scholar
Longenecker, G., Moore, C. W. & Petty, W. J. (1994). Small business management – An entrepreneurial emphasis. 9th edn. Thomson, Cincinnati OH.Google Scholar
Mayer, M., Heinzel, W. & Müller, R. (1989). Performance of new technology-based firms in the federal republic of germany at the stage of market entry, in Brockhaus, R. H.et al. (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1989 – Proceedings of the 1989 Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, pp. 200–215.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. G. (1998). The management team handbook. Five key strategies for maximizing group performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Michel, J. G. & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9–37.Google Scholar
Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 10, 125–141.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A. (1992). High performance executive teams. Corporate Board, 13(75), 20–25.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A. (Eds.) (1997). Executive teams. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A. & Heilpern, J. D. (1998). The CEO and the executive team: managing the unique dynamics and the special demands, In Nadler, D. A. (ed.) (1998). Executive teams. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A. & Spencer, L. J. (Eds.) (1997). Executive teams. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. & Cannon, D. (2000). Two views from the bridge: how CFOs and SME leaders perceive top team dynamics. European Management Journal, 18(4), 367–376.Google Scholar
O'Neill, H. & Duker, J. (1986). Survival and failure in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
Pasanen, M. (2003). In search of factors affecting SME performance: the case of Eastern Finland. Kuopio University Publications H. Business and Information Technology 1. University of Kuopio, Kuopio.Google Scholar
Pasanen, M. & Laukkanen, T. (2006). Team-managed growing SMEs: a distinct species? Management Research News, 29(11), 684–700.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pleschak, F. & Werner, H. (1998). Technologieorientierte unternehmensgründungen in den neuen Bundesländern – Wissenschaftliche Analyse und Begleitung de BMBF-Modellversuchs. Physika Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D. (2000). Collaborative leadership teams: oxymoron or new paradigm? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Winter 52(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Reinmoeller, P. (2004). The knowledge-based view of the firm and upper echelon theory: exploring the agency of TMT. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 91–104.Google Scholar
Reuber, A. R. & Fischer, E. (1997). The influence of the management team's experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 807–825.Google Scholar
Rosa, P. & Scott, M. (1999). The prevalence of multiple owners and directors in the SME sector: implications for our understanding of start-up and growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
Roure, J. & Maidique, M. (1986). Linking pre-funding factors and high-technology venture success: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 295–306.Google Scholar
Schjoedt, L. (2007). Defining entrepreneurial teams and modeling entrepreneurial team performance. Paper presented at ICSB Conference, Turku 12-15 11 2007.Google Scholar
Shaver, K. G. & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23–45.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P. Jr., O'Bannon, D. P. & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Stumpf, S. A., Doh, J. P. & Clark, K. D. (2002). Professional services firms in transition: challenges and opportunities for improving performance. Organizational Dynamics, 31(3), 259–279.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E., Stuart, R. & Lindsay, P. R. (1996). The competence of top team members: a framework for successful performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(3), 44–66.Google Scholar
Timmons, J. (1999). New venture creation: entre-preneurship for the 21st century. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Tosi, H. L., Mero, N. P. & Rizzo, J. R. (2000). Managing organizational behavior. 4th edn, Blackwell Business, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ucbasaran, D. & Lockett, A. & Wright, M. & Westhead, P. (2003). Entrepreneurial founder teams: factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter, 107–127.Google Scholar
Ucbasaran, D. & Wright, M. & Westhead, P. (2003). A longitudinal study of habitual entrepreneurs: starters and acquirers. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(3), 207–228.Google Scholar
van Egeren, M. R. (1994). A causal model of top management teams and external environmental antecedents of market orientation and organizational performance in service organizations. PhD Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
van Gils, A. (2005). Management and governance in Dutch SMEs. European Management Journal, 23(5), 583–589.Google Scholar
Vesper, K. H. (1990). New venture strategies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Vyakarnam, S., Jacobs, R. & Handelberg, J. (1997). Formation and development of entrepreneurial teams in rapid growth businesses. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Vyakarnam, S. & Handelberg, J. (2005). Four themes of the impact of management teams on organizational performance. International Small Business Journal, 23(3), 236–256.Google Scholar
Vyakarnam, S. & Jacobs, R. & Handelberg, J. (1999). Exploring the formation of entrepreneurial teams: the key to rapid growth business? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 6(2), 153–165.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. G., Pfeiffer, J. & O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74–92.Google Scholar
Watson, W. & Ponthieu, L. & Critelli, J. (1995). Team interpersonal effectiveness in venture partnerships and its connection to perceived success. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 393–411.Google Scholar
Weinzimmer, L. (1997). Top management team correlates of organizational growth in a small business context: a comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
Westhead, P. & Storey, D. & Cowling, M. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the factors associated with the survival of independent high-technology firms in Great Britain, in Chittenden, F. & Robertson, M. & Marshall, I. (eds.), Small firms: partnerships for growth, Paul Chapman, London, pp. 63–99.Google Scholar
Wijewardena, H. & Cooray, S. (1996). Factors contributing to the growth of small manufacturing firms: perceptions on Japanese owner/managers. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 4(4), 351–361.Google Scholar
Wiklund, J. (1998). Small firm growth and performance: entrepreneurship and beyond. Ark Tryckaren, Jônkôping.Google Scholar
Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs' networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), 391–413.Google Scholar
Yusuf, A. (1995). Critical success factors for small business: perceptions of South Pacific entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(2), 68–73.Google Scholar