Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:52:14.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiated reputation effects on trust in ability and dedication: A coproducer selection context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Chin-Wen Chang  and
Cheng-Min Chuang
Chin-Wen Chang*
Affiliation:
Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
Cheng-Min Chuang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that trusting belief in one's ability is critical to coproducer selection; however, the importance of trusting belief in dedication has been ignored. This study aims to explore how reputation (i.e., word-of-mouth, certification, and recommendation) affects trusting belief in a potential coproducer's ability and dedication and examines its mediating effects in coproducing with a potential partner.

Empirical results show significant mediating effects of trusting belief in a potential coproducer's ability from certification, word-of-mouth, and recommendation, which in turn motivate coproduction, whereas certification leads to the motivation for coproduction through trusting belief in a potential coproducer's dedication. The findings refer to a unitary acceptance of ability but a divergent recognition of dedication. The focal party may regard certification as factual without personal distortion, while the recommendation is an evaluation worth considering. In considering dedication, the focal party may be unable to assess the extent of distortion from second-hand information (e.g., word-of-mouth).

Keywords

trusting belief in abilitytrusting belief in dedicationcoproductionsignaling theorysocial network perspective
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 774 - 791
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The original version of this article was published with an incorrect author affiliation. A notice detailing this has been published and the error rectified in the online and print PDF and HTML copies.

References

Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795. doi:10.2307/1815199Google Scholar
Auh, S., Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359–370. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensaou, M., & Anderson, E. (1999). Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organization Science, 10(4), 460–481. doi:10.2307/2640366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362. doi:10.2307/2489496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3), 643–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.-S., Tsou, H.-T., & Ching, R. K. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1331–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, T. (1994). Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. doi:10.1177/0149206310388419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, J. C., Basker, R. M., Heath, J. R., Ralph, J. P., Glantz, O., & Hammond, P. (2000). Prosthetics: Communication between the dentist and the dental technician. British Dental Journal, 189(9), 471–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. O. M. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing team? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.Google Scholar
Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620. doi:10.2307/259297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, J., & McMillan, J. (2013). Management development and co-production: Myths and realities. Journal of Management Development, 32(9), 971–983. doi:10.1108/JMD-07-2012-0083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503. doi:10.2307/2393314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, L. M., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., & Weber, T. J. (2012). Driven to work and enjoyment of work: Effects on managers’ outcomes. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1655–1680. doi:10.1177/0149206310363612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haj-Ali, R., Al Quran, F., & Adel, O. (2012). Dental laboratory communication regarding removable dental prosthesis design in the UAE. Journal of Prosthodontics, 21(5), 425–428. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00842.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harzing, A.-W. (2000). Cross-national industrial mail surveys: Why do response rates differ between countries? Industrial Marketing Management, 29(3), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. (1966). Writing work authorizations for removable partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 16(4), 696–707. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90148-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J.-F. (1989). The transaction-cost rationale for countertrade. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 5(1), 127–153.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467.Google Scholar
Hopp, C., & Lukas, C. (2014). A signaling perspective on partner selection in venture capital syndicates. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 635–670. doi:10.1111/etap.12023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(2), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 363–374. doi:10.1002/asi.20722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewell, B. (2007). Linking risk and reputation: A research agenda and methodological analysis. Risk Management, 9(4), 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B., & Han, I. (2009). The role of trust belief and its antecedents in a community-driven knowledge environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1012–1026. doi:10.1002/asi.21041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. J. (2008). Self-perception-based versus transference-based trust determinants in computer-mediated transactions: A cross-cultural comparison study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 13–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. (1986). On designing contracts to guarantee enforceability: Theory and evidence from East-West trade. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, P. D. (1994). Buyer-supplier co-operation, product quality and total costs. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(6), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, S. W., Mencl, J., Maranto, C., Bourne, K. A., & Keaveny, T. (2010). The impact of passing the professional in human resources exam on early career success for undergraduates entering the human resource field. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(3), 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2008). Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, D., & Allen, P. F. (2005). Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: A comparative study. British Dental Journal, 198(1), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002a). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002b). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. TheJournal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1995). Swift trust and temporary groups. In Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Milliman, R. E., & Fugate, D. L. (1988). Using trust-transference as a persuasion technique: An empirical field investigation. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Money, K., Hillenbrand, C., Day, M., & Magnan, G. M. (2010). Exploring reputation of B2B partnerships: Extending the study of reputation from the perception of single firms to the perception of inter-firm partnerships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 761–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, P., Baden-Fuller, C., & Hopkins, M. M. (2011). Projects, project capabilities and project organizations. Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 215–234. doi:10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, R. C. (1999). Increasing affective organizational commitment in public organizations: The Key role of interpersonal trust. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 58–70. doi:10.1177/0734371X9901900305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science, 22(4), 1087–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: Specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long-standing ties. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1195–1216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00779.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radhi, A., Lynch, C. D., & Hannigan, A. (2007). Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34(2), 153–157. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01685.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., & Taris, T. W. (2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43(4), 320–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–392. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skilton, P. F. (2011). Varieties of cooperative strategy in project based organizing: The case of international motion picture co-production. Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 27–59. doi:10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. P. (1963). The responsibility of the dentist toward laboratory procedures in fixed and removable partial denture prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 13(2), 295–301. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90174-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, J., & Zahedi, F. M. (2007). Trust in health infomediaries. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 390–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519. doi:10.5465/AMR.1979.4498309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S. M., Coley, L. S., & Lindemann, E. (2011). Effect of suppliers’ reputation on the future of buyer-supplier relationships: The mediating roles of outcome fairness and trust. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376. doi:10.2307/256366Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In Bacharach, S. (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–47). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 53–111.Google Scholar