Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:45:12.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collective expertise: Ways of organizing expert work in collective settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Niina Koivunen
Niina Koivunen*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two gaps appear in the theory of ‘expertise’: expert work as an individual endeavor; and, researchers and managers understanding little of expert practice. To bridge these gaps, ‘collective expertise’ can describe ways of organizing professional expert work in collective settings. This study analyzes ‘collective expertise’ in three Scandinavian cases using ethnographic methods: a product development process at Volvo; a description of computer programmers' work; and an analysis of nano physicists' organizing practices. The empirical results are used to build a ‘collective expertise’ theory, based on seven factors identified as contributing to collective expertise: concrete work routines, minimal structure, generosity and gift giving, narratives and story-telling, aesthetic capabilities, room for individuality, and mixed practice zone.

Keywords

collective expertiseknowledge managementways of organizingcommunities of practiceaction netsethnographyScandinavia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 258 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

April, K (1999) Leading through communication, conversation and dialogue, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 20(5): 231–241.Google Scholar
Barley, SR and Kunda, G (2001) Bringing work back in, Organization Science 12(1): 76–95.Google Scholar
Barrett, FJ (1998) Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations, Organization Science 9(5): 605–22.Google Scholar
Blackler, F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations, an overview and interpretation, Organization Studies 16: 1021–46.Google Scholar
Blackler, F, Crump, N and McDonald, S (1999) Managing experts and competing through innovation: An activity theoretical analysis, Organization 6(1): 5–31.Google Scholar
Boje, D (1991) The storytelling organization: A study of storytelling performance in an office supply firm, Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 106–26.Google Scholar
Bragd, A (2002) Knowing Management. An Ethnographic Study of Tinkering with a New Car, BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Brown, JS and Duguid, P (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation, Organization Science 2(1): 40–57.Google Scholar
Byrkjeflot, H (2003) Nordic Management: From functional socialism to shareholder value? in Czarniawska, B and Sevón, G (Eds) The Northern Lights - Organization Theory in Scandinavia, pp 17–40, Liber, Abstract and Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö.Google Scholar
Case, P and Piñeiro, E (2006) Aesthetics, perform-ativity and resistance in the narratives of a computer programming community, Human Relations, 59(6): 753–82.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B and Sevón, G (2003) Introduction: Did the Vikings know how to organize? in Czarniawska, B and Sevón, G (Eds) The Northern Lights - Organization Theory in Scandinavia, pp 9–13, Liber, Abstract and Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B (2004a) On time, space and action nets, Organization 11(6): 777–95.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B (2004b) Narratives in Social Science Research, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Empson, L (2001) Introduction: Knowledge management in professional service firms, Human Relations, 54(7): 811–17.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J and Käufer, K (2003) Shared leadership. paradox and possibility, in Pearce, GL and Conger, JA (Eds) Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, pp 21–47, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
Føsstenlokken, SM, Løwendahl, BR and Revang ∅ (2003) Knowledge development through client interaction: a comparative study, Organization Studies 24(6): 859–80.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing, Human Relations, 54(1): 131–39.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S (2008) Situated knowledge and situated action: what do practice-based studies promise? In Barry, D and Hansen, H (Eds) Sage Handbook of the New and Emerging in Management & Organization, pp 2–22, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Glimell, H (2001) Challenging limits – Excerpts from an emerging ethnography of nano physicists, in Glimell, H and Juhlin, O (Eds) The Social Production of Technology: On everyday life with things, pp 111–131, BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Guillet de Monthoux, P, Gustafsson, C and Sjöstrand, S-E (Ed.) (2007) Aesthetic Leadership: Managing Fields of Flow in Art and Business, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Hackman, JR. (Ed) 1990 Groups that work (and those that don't), Jossey—Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hansson, H (1999) Kollektiv kompetens – en studie av skicklig interaktiv handling [Collective competence – A study of heedful interactive action], BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hernes, T and Weik, E (2007) Organization as process. Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views, Scandinavian Journal of Management 23(3): 251–264.Google Scholar
Himanen, P (2001) The Hacker Ethic, and the Spirit of the Information Age, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Holbek, J and Knudsen, H (2001) Temporal pacing in innovation streams. Towards a concept of polyrhythmic leadership, in In Search of Time, A conference on methodologies and recent developments of time research in management and in the social sciences, ISIDA, 05 8-10 2001, Palermo, Italy.Google Scholar
Hosking, D-M (1988) Organizing, leadership and skilful process, Journal of Management Studies 25(2): 147–66.Google Scholar
Hosking, D-M, Dachler, P and Gergen, K (1995) Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism, Avebury, Aldershot UK.Google Scholar
Hosking, D-M (1999) Social construction as process: some new possibilites for research and development, Concepts and Transformation 4(2): 117–32.Google Scholar
Isaacs, W (1999) Dialogue: The Art of Thinking Together, Currency, New York.Google Scholar
King, IW and Rowe, A (1999) Space and the not-sofinal frontiers. Representing the potential of collective learning for organizations, Management Learning 30(4): 431–48.Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (1994) Projektin johtaminen laivanrakennusteollisuudessa, Esimerkkiyrityksenä Finnyards Oy[Project Managent in Shipbuilding Industry. Case Finnyards], Master's thesis, University of Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (2002) Organizational Music: the role of listening in interaction processes. Consumption, Markets, Culture 5(1): 99–107Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (2003) Leadership in Symphony Orchestras. Discursive and Aesthetic Practices. Tampere: Tampere University Press. Also available in digital version: http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-5562-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koivunen, N (2005) Miten kollektiivinen asiantuntijuus organisoituu? [Organizing Collective Expertise], Hallinnon Tutkimus 24(3): 32–45.Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (2006) Auditive Leadership Culture. Lessons from Symphony Orchestras, in Hosking, DM & McNamee, S (Eds), The Social Construction of Organization, pp 91–111, Oslo: Liber.Google Scholar
Koivunen, N (2007) The Art of Shipbuilding. 19th Nordic Academy of Management Conference: The Future of Nordic Business Schools, Bergen, Norway, 08 9-11.Google Scholar
Köping, A-S (2003) Den bundna friheten. Om kreativitet och relationer i ett koserthus [The limited freedom. On creativity and relations in a concert hall], Arvinius Förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Köping, A-S (2007) The Creative Compost: Playing and Conducting Musical Events, in Guillet de Monthoux Pierre, Gustafsson, C and Sjöstrand, S-E (Eds) Aesthetic Leadership: Managing Fields of Flow in Art and Business, pp. 15–32, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Ladkin, D (2008) Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice, Leadership Quarterly 19(1): 31–41.Google Scholar
Latour, B (1999) On recalling ANT, in Law, J and Hassard, J (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lave, J and Wenger, E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Law, J (1999) After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology, in Law, J and Hassard, J (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lee, GK and Cole, RE (2003) From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation, Organization Science 14(6): 633–49.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1966) The Savage Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
Lindberg, K (2002) Kopplandets kraft. Om organisering mellan organisationer [The power of networking. On organizing between organizations], BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Løwendahl, B (1997) Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms, Handelshøjshlens Forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N (2003) The Nature of Knowledge and the Entry Mode Decision, Organization Studies 24(6): 935–60.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I and Takeuchi, H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Orr, JE (1996) Talking about Machines – An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY.Google Scholar
Parry, KW and Hansen, H (2007) The organizational story as leadership, Leadership 3(3): 281–300.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J (2006) Kollektiivinen asiantuntijuus [Collective expertise], Tampere University Press, Tampere.Google Scholar
Piñeiro, E (2003) The Aesthetics of Code. On excellence in instrumental action, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M (1962) Personal Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Porsander, L (2000) Titt-skåp för alla. En berättelse on hur Stockholm blev kulturhuvudstad [Something for everyone. A story of how Stockholm became culture capital], BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Ramírez, R (1991) The Beauty of Social Organization, Accedo, München.Google Scholar
Ramírez, R (1996) Wrapping form and organizational beauty, Organization 3(2): 233–42.Google Scholar
Rehn, A (2001) Electronic Potlatch – a study on new technologies and primitive economic behaviors, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Rehn, A (2004) The politics of contraband. The honor economies of the warez scene, Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 359–74.Google Scholar
Robertson, M, Scarbrough, H and Swan, J (2003) Knowledge creation in professional service firms: institutional effects, Organization Studies 24(6): 831–58.Google Scholar
Scandianavian Journal of Management (2007) Special Issue: Processual Approaches in Management and Organization Studies 23(3).Google Scholar
Soila-Wadman, M (2003) Kapitulationens estetik. Organisering och ledarskap i filmprojekt, [The aesthetics of capitulation. Organizing and leadership in film projects], Arvinius Förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Soila-Wadman, M (2007) Can artists be leaders? Beyond heroic film directing, in Guillet de Monthoux, P, Gustafsson, C and Sjöstrand, S-E (Eds) Aesthetic Leadership: Managing Fields of Flow in Art and Business, pp. 72–86, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Strati, A (1999) Organization and Aesthetics, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Swan, J and Scarbrough, H (2001) Editorial: Knowledge management: concepts and controversies, Journal of Management Studies 38(7): 913–22.Google Scholar
Taylor, SS (2002) Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational members' aesthetic experience, Human Relations 55(7): 821–840Google Scholar
Tell, F (2004) What do organizations know? Dynamics of justification contexts in R&D activities, Organization 11(4): 443–71.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H and Vladimirou, E (2001) What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies 38(7): 973–94.Google Scholar
Weick, KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.Google Scholar
Weick, KE and Roberts, KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks, Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 357–81.Google Scholar
Wenger, E (1998) Communities of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Werr, A and Stjernberg, T (2003) Exploring management consulting firms and knowledge systems, Organization Studies 24(6): 881–908.Google Scholar
Winroth, K (1999) När management kom till advokatsbyrån. Om professioner, identitet och organisering [When management entered the law firm. On professions, identity and organizing], BAS, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Wood, M (2002) Mind the Gap? A processual reconsideration of organizational knowledge, Organization 9(1): 151–71.Google Scholar