Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:12:11.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Board and CEO practice in modem strategy-making: How is strategy developed, who is the boss and in what circumstances?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Tim O'Shannassy
Tim O'Shannassy*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, RMIT University, Graduate School of Business, Melbourne VIC, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interplay of the board of directors (BOD) and the chief executive officer (CEO) in strategy-making has been the subject of some debate in the literature. Some experts argue the BOD should take a strong role in strategy-making while the alternative point of view is that the CEO is the key man or woman. In a qualitative study with 16 interviews of leading Australian industry figures, the CEO is found to be the key player in modern strategy-making. The findings identify how the BOD, individual directors and the CEO can combine to add value to the organization, in particular how these organization members can team up and interact to achieve a faster, more flexible strategy cycle. The modern organization focus needs to be on giving more emphasis to the empowerment, interaction and creativity of the CEO and top management team. The BOD should focus on questioning, criticizing, refining and enabling the strategy proposed by the professional managers. However, the study indicates these findings are subject to exception and variation in relation to factors including specialist knowledge, track record of performance, personality attributes, personal power, and political and influencing skills. The major focus of attention of the BOD and CEO is the strategic-thinking related activities in strategy-making. Strategic planning still has an important role in formalizing strategy content, usually in a regular cycle.

Keywords

corporate governanceboard of directorschief executive officerstrategy-makingqualitative interviews
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 280 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilera, R and Cuervo-Cazurra, A (2009) Codes of good corporate governance, Corporate Governance: an International Review 17: 17–376.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R (1978) A Realist Theory of Science, Leeds Books, Leeds.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R (1989) Reclaiming reality: a critical introduction to contemporary philosophy, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Boeker, W and Goodstein, J (1991) Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition, Academy of Management Journal 34: 34–805.Google Scholar
Bonn, I and Christodoulou, C (1996) From strategic planning to strategic management, Long Range Planning 29(4): 543–551.Google Scholar
Bonn, I and Pettigrew, A (2009) Towards a dynamic theory of boards: An organisational life-cycle approach, Journal of Management & Organization 15(1): 2–16.Google Scholar
Boone, A, Field, L, Karpoff, J and Raheja, C (2007) The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 85: 85–66.Google Scholar
Bosch, H (1995) The director at risk: accountability in the boardroom, Pearson, Melbourne VIC.Google Scholar
Bruton, G and Lau, C-M (2008) Asian management research: Status today and future outlook, Journal of Management Studies 45: 45–636.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R and Grove, A (2007) Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos – repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity, Strategic Management Journal 28: 28–965.Google Scholar
Cadbury, A (1999) What are the trends in corporate governance? How will they impact your company? Long Range Planning 32(1): 12–19.Google Scholar
Carter, CB and Lorsch, JW (2004) Back to the drawing board: Designing corporate boards for a complex world, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Charan, R (2005) Ending the CEO succession crisis, Harvard Business Review 02: 72–81.Google Scholar
Chizema, A and Kim, J (2010) Outside directors on Korean boards: Governance and institutions, Journal of Management Studies 47: 47–109.Google Scholar
Christensen, C and Raynor, M (2003) The innovator's solution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Coles, J, Daniel, N and Naveen, L (2008) Boards: does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87: 87–329.Google Scholar
Combs, J, Ketchen, D Jr, Perryman, A and Donahue, M (2007) The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition–firm performance relationship, Journal of Management Studies 44(8): 1299–1323.Google Scholar
Conger, JA, Finegold, D and Lawler, EE II (1998) Appraising boardroom performance, Harvard Business Review 02-February: 136–148.Google Scholar
Cyert, RM (1990) Defining leadership and explicating the process, Non-Profit Management and Leadership 1(1): 29–38.Google Scholar
Dalton, CM and Dalton, DR (2005) Boards of directors: Utilizing empirical evidence in developing practical prescriptions, British Journal of Management 16: S91–S97.Google Scholar
Daily, C, Dalton, D and Cannella, A (2003) Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data, Academy of Management Review 28: 28–371.Google Scholar
Demb, A and Neubauer, F (1992) The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dewally, M and Peck, S (2010) Upheaval in the boardroom: Outside director public resignations, motivations and consequences, Journal of Corporate Finance 16: 16–38.Google Scholar
De Wit, B and Meyer, R (2004) Strategy: process, content, context, 3rd edn, Thomson, London.Google Scholar
Ertimur, Y, Ferri, F and Stubben, S (2010) Board of directors' responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence from shareholder proposals, Journal of Corporate Finance 16: 16–53.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D and Fukotomi, G (1991) The seasons of a CEO's tenure, Academy of Management Review, 16: 16–717.Google Scholar
Hamel, G (2000) Leading the revolution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Ma.Google Scholar
Hamel, G (2009) Moon shots for management, Harvard Business Review 02: 91–98.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L (1998) Strategic thinking or strategic planning?, Long Range Planning 31: 481–487.Google Scholar
Hill, S (1995) The social organization of boards of directors, The British Journal of Sociology 46: 245–278.Google Scholar
Hill, R and Stephens, D (2003) The compassionate organization in the 21st century, Organizational Dynamics 32(4): 331–341.Google Scholar
SirHogg, Christopher, Who governs?Unpublished paper, London: Reuters, 25 03 1994.Google Scholar
Ireland, R and Hitt, M (1999) Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership, Academy of Management Executive 13: 13–43.Google Scholar
Iyengar, R and Zampelli, E (2009) Self-selection, endogeneity, and the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal 30: 30–1092.Google Scholar
Kiel, GC and Kawamoto, C (1997) A conceptual model of strategic management, Paper at British Academy of Management Annual Conference, London, 8-10 09.Google Scholar
Kiel, G and Nicholson, G (2003) Boards that work, McGraw-Hill, North Ryde, NSW.Google Scholar
Kiel, G, Nicholson, G and Barclay, M (2005) Board, director and CEO evaluation, McGraw-Hill, North Ryde, NSW.Google Scholar
Kroll, M, Walters, B and Wright, P (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes, Strategic Management Journal 29: 29–363.Google Scholar
Kvale, S (1996) InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Kwan, KM and Tsang, EWK (2001) Realism and constructivism in strategy research: A critical realist approach to Mir and Watson, Strategic Management Journal 22: 22–1163.Google Scholar
Lester, R, Hillman, A, Zardhoohi, A and Cannella, A (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human capital and social capital, Academy of Management Journal 51: 999–1013.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J (1998) Strategic thinking: can it be taught? Long Range Planning 31(1): 120–129.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J with MacIver, E (1989) Pawns or potentates: the reality of America's corporate boards, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Markides, C with Mang, P (2000) Strategy and management: Constantinos Markides discusses strategic innovation, European Management Journal 18(4): 357–366/Google Scholar
McNulty, T and Pettigrew, A (1999) Strategists on the board, Organisation Studies 20: 20–47.Google Scholar
Miles, M and Huberman, A (1994) Qualitative data analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Miller, T and Triana, M (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediator of the board diversity relationship, Journal of Management Studies 46: 755–786.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1987) Crafting and executing strategy, Harvard Business Review 07-August: 66–75Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1994) The rise and fall of strategic planning, Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
Mir, R and Watson, A (2000) Strategic management and the philosophy of science: The case for a constructivist methodology, Strategic Management Journal 21: 21–941.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G and Newton, C (2006) An empirical investigation of perceptions of board roles among the corporate elite, Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Annual Conference, Rockhampton, QLD.Google Scholar
Park, C and Kim, S (2008) Corporate governance, regulatory changes, and corporate restructuring in Korea, 1993-2004, Journal of World Business, 43: 66–84.Google Scholar
Payne, G, Benson, G and Finegold, D (2009) Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance, Journal of Management Studies 46: 704–731.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J (1972) Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organisation and its environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218–228.Google Scholar
Porter, ME (1996) What is strategy?Harvard Business Review 11-December: 61–78.Google Scholar
Pye, A (2002) Corporate directing: Governing, strategising and leading in action, Corporate Governance 10(3): 153–162.Google Scholar
Pye, A and Pettigrew, A (2005) Studying board context, process and dynamics: Some challenges for the future, British Journal of Management 16: S27–S38.Google Scholar
Roberts, J, McNulty, T and Stiles, P (2005) Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the nonexecutive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom, British Journal of Management 16, S5–S26Google Scholar
Shen, W (2003) The dynamics of the CEO–board relationship: An evolutionary perspective, Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 466–476.Google Scholar
Shen, W (2005) Improve board effectiveness: The need for incentives, British Journal of Management 16: S81–S89.Google Scholar
Shen, W and Cannella, A (2002) Power dynamics with top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession, Academy of Management Journal 45: 45–1195.Google Scholar
Stiles, P and Taylor, B (2001) Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tushman, M and O'Reilly, C III (1997) Winning through innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Tushman, M and O'Reilly, C III (2004) The ambidextrous organization, Harvard Business Review 04: 74–81.Google Scholar
Westphal, J (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO–board social ties, Academy of Management Journal 42: 42–7.Google Scholar
Zajac, E and Westphal, J (1996) Director reputation, CEO–board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks, Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 507–529.Google Scholar