Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:44:58.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP's N and the N of NP1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Roger Hawkins
Roger Hawkins
Affiliation:
Department of French, University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Efforts to limit the power of transformations, and thereby reduce the class of possible grammars, have been concentrated in two areas: the conditions which restrict the application of the transformational rules, and the examination of the consequences of placing the burden of description on the non-transformational components of the grammar. Recent work on the non-transformational components has led to some interesting conclusions about how this power can be reduced. An article by Bresnan (1978) is a good example of this line of research. She cites a number of cases where transferring the burden of description from the transformational component to the lexicon and semantic interpretive components not only leads to a simplification in the from of the transformational rules, but also captures generalizations not adequately explained by transformations.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , September 1981 , pp. 247 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowers, J. S. (1975). Some adjectival nominalizations in English. Lingua 37. 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. A.(eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972). Remarks on nominalization. In Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton. 11–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creamer, M. (1974). Ranking in Navaho nouns. Navaho language review 1.Google Scholar
De Lage, G. (1972). Introduction à l'ancienfrancais. Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar
Foulet, L. (1974). Petite syntaxe de l'ancienfrancais. Paris: CFMA.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1973). A note on subject–object inversion in Navaho. In Kachru, B., Lees, R. B., Malkiel, Y., Pietrangeli, A. & Saporta, S. (eds), Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renee Kahane. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 300–309.Google Scholar
Heilmann, L. (ed.) (1972). Proceedings of the 11th international congress of linguists. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Lg 51. 639–671.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1977). X̄ syntax: a study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1972) Is extrinsic order necessary? In Heilmann, L. (ed.) (1972). 971–987.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (ed.) (1976). The application and ordering of grammatical rules. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. A. & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.Google Scholar
Moss, P. (1968). Today's English. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. & Postal, P. M. (1977). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. PBLS 3. 394–417.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. (1979). Review of Koutsoudas, A. (ed.) (1976). JL 15. 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, E. N. (1977). Definiteness, animacy and NP ordering. PBLS 3. 418–429.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. (1972). On arguments for rule ordering. FL 8. 266–273.Google Scholar
Thomason, R. H. & Stalnaker, R. C. (1973). A semantic theory of adverbs. LIn 4. 195–220.Google Scholar