Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T04:24:22.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Lyons
John Lyons
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1966 , pp. 209 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. S. (1956). Structure and system in Abaza. TPhS. 127–76.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1964). Transitivity and possession. Lg., 40. 337–43.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and Information. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley & Jerusalem: Jerusalem Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E. (1949). Syntactic relations and linguistic typology. CFS, 8. 5–20.Google Scholar
Bally, Ch. (1932). Linguistique Générale et Linguistique Française, Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Belvalkar, K. (1915). Systems of Sanskrit Grammar. Poona.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brøndal, V. (1948). Les Parties du Discours. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. (1955). India and linguistics. JAOS, 75. 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1964). The organization of language: A stratificational view. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 17. 75–95. (Edited by C. I. J. M. Stuart.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, L. H. (1939). Foundations of Language. New York.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) (1963). Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Roland (1965). Parts of speech. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 39. 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. JL 2. 110–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles (1966). Some reflections on metaphysics and language. Foundations of Language, 2. 20–32.Google Scholar
Hays, David G. (1964). Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Lg., 40. 511–25.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1928). Principes de Grammaire Générale. (Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab., Hist.-Filolog. Medd., 16, i.) Copenhague: Høst & Søn.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1935). La Catégorie des Cas, Etude de Grammaire Générale. (Acta Jutlandica Aarsskrift for Aarhus Universitet, 9.) Aarhus: Universitetsfarlaget.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1959). Essais Linguistiques. (TCLC, 12.) Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963). Implications of language universals for linguistics. In Greenberg (1963: 208–19).Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1929). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistics Decriptions. (Research Monographs, 26.) Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1965). On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. (Report No. NSF-16, Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Computation Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. (1964). On alternation, transformation, realization and stratification. Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 17. 105–22. (Edited by C. I. J. M. Stuart.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Magnusson, R. (1954). Studies in the Theory of the Parts of Speech. (Lund Studies in English, 24.) Lund: Gleerup & Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1965). The inflexional component of a transformational grammar. JL 1. 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. (1921). Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1964). ‘Sequence’ and ‘order’. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 17. 123–30. (Edited by C. I. J. M. Stuart.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (1888). Principles of the History of Language. (Translated from the second German edition by Strong, H. A..) London: Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1933). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1951). Ancient and Medieval Grammatical Theory in Europe. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1966). The development of the word class system of the European grammatical tradition. Foundations of Language, 2. 3–19.Google Scholar
Sandmann, M. (1954). Subject and Predicate. (Edinburgh University Publications, Language & Literature, 5.) Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Šaumjan, S. K. (1965). Strukturnaja Linguistika. (Akademia Nauk S.S.S.R., Institut Russkogo Jazyka.) Moskva: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauk’.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H. (1928). Hugo Schuchardt Brevier, 2nd ed. (Edited by Spitzer, L..) Halle a. S.Google Scholar
Strand, Barbara M. H. (1962). Modern English Structure. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Thieme, P. (1956). Pånini and the Påniniyas. JAOS 76. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1920). Vorlesungen über Syntax. Basel: Emil Birkhäuser.Google Scholar