Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:33:28.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terence McKay, Infinitival complements in German: lassen, scheinen and the verbs of perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. viii + 231. - Jindrich Toman, Studies in German grammar. Foris: Dordrecht, 1985. Pp. x + 447.

Review products

Terence McKay, Infinitival complements in German: lassen, scheinen and the verbs of perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. viii + 231.
Jindrich Toman, Studies in German grammar. Foris: Dordrecht, 1985. Pp. x + 447.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Liliane Haegeman
Liliane Haegeman
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 244 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Evers, A. (1975). The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. IULC.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L., & van Riemsdijk, H. (1986). Verb-Raising, scope and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Lin 17. 417–466.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (1985). The finite sentence in Swedish and English. Trondheim. WPSS 3.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1981). Linguistic theory in America. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1983). Grammatical theory. Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar