We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bach, E. & Partee, B. H. (1980). Anaphora and semantic structure. In Kreiman & Oteda (eds.), 1–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). On binding. LIn11.1. 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1979). The interpretation of pronouns. In Heny, F. & Schnelle, H. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics10. New York: Academic Press. 61–72.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1980). Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee. In Kreiman & Oteda (eds.), 29–40.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. (1983). Definite NPs and context-dependence: a unified theory of anaphora. Unpublished manuscript, S.O.A.S.Google Scholar
Kreiman, K. J. & Oteda, A. E. (eds.) (1980). Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics SocietyGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (1981). Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains. LIn12.4. 605–635.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy6.1. 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar