Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:52:46.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sydney M. Lamb, Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 1966. Pp. 109.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

F. R. Palmer
F. R. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , September 1968 , pp. 287 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. (1965) Review of Stuart (1964). Word 21. 273–285.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. (1947). English verb inflection. Lg 23. 399–418. Reprinted in Joos (1958: 243–254).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1964). The organization of language: a stratificational view. In Stuart (1964: 75–95).Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1965). Linguistics: and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–292.Google Scholar
Hamp, E. P., Householder, F. W. & Austerlitz, R. (eds.) (1966). Readings in Linguistics II. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Lg 18. 169–180. Reprinted in Joos (1958: 109–115).Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Lg 28. 1–30.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Lg 23. 321–343. Reprinted in Joos (1958: 229–242).Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210–231. Reprinted in Joos (1958: 386–399).Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1955). A Manual of Phonology. (IJAL. Memoir 11.) Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1961). Linguistic elements and their relations. Lg 37. 29–53.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (1958). Readings in Linguistics. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1962). Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1964 a). On alternation, transformation, realization and stratification. In Stuart (1964: 105–122).Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1964 b). The sememic approach to structural semantics. AmA 66. 57–78.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1965). Kinship terminology and linguistic structure. AmA 67. 37–64.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1966). Prolegomena to a theory of phonology. Lg 42. 536–573.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1966). A guide to publications related to tagmemic theory. In Current Trends in Linguistics III, 365–394. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1964). Constituent Structure: A Study of Contemporary Models of Syntactic Description. (IJAL Publication 30.) Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. Reprinted New York: Harcourt, Brace (Harvest Books), 1949.Google Scholar
Stuart, C. I. J. M. (ed.) (1964). Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics. 17. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar