Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:33:30.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A survey of general comparative grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christian Lehmann
Affiliation:
University of Bielefeld

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A. & Van Valin, R. D. Jr, (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. (1976). The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. 78105.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. & Stegmann, C. (1962). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, 4th ed. Teil 2: Satzlehre. 2 vols. Leverkusen: Gottschalk.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Ch. (1984a). Progress in general comparative linguistics. Studies in Language 8: 259286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Ch. (1984b). Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen — Theorie seiner Funktionen—Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. & Blake, B. J. (1981). Language typology. Cross-linguistic studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar