Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:09:21.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress and vocalic change in Hebrew: a diachronic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

J. C. L. Gibson
J. C. L. Gibson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, New College, Edinburgh 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three stages of Hebrew are covered by the enquiry:

(a) a Proto-Hebrew stage (= PH), when I assume Hebrew to have conformed to the language structure of the common Northwest Semitic of the second millennium B.C. Its lineaments can be recovered by a backward reconstruction from the following stage controlled by comparison with the surviving second millennium dialects, Amorite (see Gelb, 1958), Ugaritic (see Gordon, 1955) and Tell el-Amarna Canaanite (see Dhorme, 1951). The theory that Northwest Semitic at this early period was more or less a unity and that a division into Aramaic and Canaanite sub-groupings can be safely carried through only after about 1000 B.C. is now generally accepted; see Moscati, 1956; Garbini, 1960.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1966 , pp. 35 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, H. & Leander, P. (1922). Historische Grammatik der hebräischen Sprache des Alten Testaments. Halle a. S: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Beer, G. & Meyer, R. (1952, 1955). Hebräische Grammatik, Vols.1 & 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ben-Hayyim, Z. (1954). Studies in the Traditions of the Hebrew Language, Madrid-Barcelona: Instituto ‘Arias Montano’.Google Scholar
Bergsträsser, G. (1918). Hebräische Grammatik, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Vogel.Google Scholar
Birkeland, H. (1940). Akzent und Vokalismus im Althebräischen: mit Beiträgen zur vergleichenden semitischen Sprachwissenschaft. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, Vol. 2, Historisk-filosofisk Klasse, No.3.Google Scholar
Brønno, E. (1943). Studien über Hebräische Morphologie und vokalismus auf Grundlage der Mercatischen Fragmente der zweiten Kolumne der Hexapla des Origenes. (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, No.28). Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Cantineau, J. (1946). Esquisse d'une phonologie de l'arabe classique. BSL 43. 93–140.Google Scholar
Cantineau, J. (1950). Essai d'une phonologie de l'hébreu biblique. BSL 46. 82–122.Google Scholar
Cowan, W. (1960). Arabic evidence for Proto-Semitic */awa/ and */o/. Lg 36. 60–2.Google Scholar
Dhorme, É. (1951). La langue de Canaan, Recueil Édouard Dhorme: 405–89. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Garbini, G. (1960). Il Semitico di Nord-ovest. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. (1958). La lingua degli amoriti. MALinc. 13. 143–64.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. (1963). A Study of Writing, 2nd edn.Chicago: Phoenix Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. C. L. (1963–1964). Hebrew Writing as a subject of linguistic investigation. Glasgow University Oriental Society Transactions 20. 49–62.Google Scholar
Goetze, A. (1939). Accent and vocalism in Hebrew. JAOS 59. 431–59.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. H. (1955). Ugaritic Manual. (Analecta Orientalia, No.35). Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1939). Development of the Canaanite Dialects. (American Oriental Series, No.16). New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1941). Linguistic structure of Hebrew. JAOS, 61. 143–67.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, H. M. (1960). Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of Language. (Janua Linguarum, No.1). 's–Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kahle, P. E. (1959). The Cairo Geniza, 2nd. edit.Oxford: Black well.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B. (1963). Phonetics. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1958). The Scribal Character of the Dead Sea Scrolls. (Bibliothèque du Muséon, Nos.44 & 45). Louvain: Institut Orientaliste.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1953). Writing Arabic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moscati, S. (1956). Il Predecessori d'Israele: Studi sulle più antiche genti semitiche in Siria e Palestina. (Università di Roma, Studi Orientali pubblicati a cura della Scuola Orientale, No.4). Rome: Bardi.Google Scholar
Moscati, S., Spitaler, A., Ullendorff, E. & von Soden, W. (1964). An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages. (Porta Linguarum Orientalium, Neue Serie, No. 6). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Morag, S. (1962). The Vocalization Systems of Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic: Their Phonetic and Phonemic Principles. (Janua Linguarum, No. 13). 's–Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Poebel, A. (1939, a). The antepenult stressing of Old Hebrew and its influence on the shaping of the vowels. American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures 56. 225–30. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poebel, A. (1939, b). Penult stressing replacing ultimate stressing in pre-exilic Hebrew. American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures 56. 384–7.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. (1951). Ancient West-Arabian. London: Taylor.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. (1953). Remarques au sujet de la phonologie de l'hébreu biblique. RB 60. 30–40.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. (1961). A marginal note on Biblical Hebrew phonology. JNES 20. 124–6.Google Scholar
Schramm, G. M. (1957). A reconstruction of the Biblical Hebrew waw consecutive. GL 3. 1–8.Google Scholar