Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:11:10.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speculations on performance models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Victoria Fromkin
Victoria Fromkin
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The publication of Syntactic Structures in 1957 stimulated a much-needed re-evaluation among linguists as to the goals of linguistic theory and the nature of language. Part of the discussion which has ensued has centred around the question of linguistic competence versus performance. Competence has been related to performance as ‘langue’ is to ‘parole’. ‘Competence’ thus refers to the ‘underlying system of rules that has been mastered by the speaker-hearer’ (Chomsky, 1965) and ‘performance’ to the way the speaker-hearer utilizes this ‘internalized grammar’ when he actually produces and understands utterances. Despite the continued controversy about this distinction, little can be added to the justifications for it put forth over many decades (cf. Chomsky, 1957, 1964, 1965; Katz, 1964, 1966; Postal, 1966; Sapir, 1933; Levin, 1965; de Saussure, 1916; etc.). Yet there remains much vagueness as to the limits of each and the relationship between the two. For many years the confusion was due to the influence of Bloomfield who centred his attention on the speech act; his aim was the classification of the OUTPUT of performance, i.e. the utterances, and led to no theory about the dynamic process of performance itself (Bloomfield, 1924, 1926, 1927, 1933). While giving lip service to a concern for ‘langue’, his own mechanistic approach negated any possibility for the rules of ‘langue’ to be anything more than lists of recurrent patterns found in ‘parole’. And since he was of the opinion that ‘the physiologic and acoustic description of acts of speech belongs to other sciences than ours’ (Bloomfield, 1926: 153) he did not direct himself to those aspects of ‘parole’ which could explain speech performance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1968 , pp. 47 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, L. (1924). Review of Court de Linguistique Générale. The Modern Language Journal 8. 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1927). Review of Otto Jespersen's The Philosophy of Grammar. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 26. 444–446.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2. 153–154. (Reprinted in M. Joos, ed., Readings in Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bohn, David (1957). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Structure of Language (1964). 50–118. (Edited by Katz, J. & Fodor, J..) Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1934). Essays in Science. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. & Infeld, L. (1954). The Evolution of Physics. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
Fry, D. (1964). The functions of the syllable. ZPhon 17. 215–237.Google Scholar
Fujimura, O. (1961). Bilabial stop and nasal consonants: a motion picture study and its acoustical implications. JSHR 4. 223–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda (1964). Discussion and further comments. New Directions in the Study of Language 109–131. (Edited by Lenneberg, E. H..) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Stevens, K. (1964). Speech recognition: a model and a program for research. The Structure of Language (1964). 604–612. (Edited by Katz, J. & Fodor, J..) Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1964). Mentalism in linguistics. Language 40. 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. (1966). The Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, V. et al. (1965). Speech: Articulation and Perception. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce-Joint Public Research Service.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 19:1. 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1966). The Nature of General Phonetic Theories. Georgetown University Monograph No. 18.Google Scholar
Levin, S. (1965). Langue and parole in American linguistics. Foundations of Language 1. 83–95.Google Scholar
Liberman, A., Cooper, F. S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Harris, K. S., Shankweiler, D. P. (1965). Some observations on the efficiency of speech sounds. Status Report on Speech Research SR4. New York: Haskins Labs.Google Scholar
Miller, G., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohman, S. E. G. (1964). Numerical model for coarticulation using a computer-simulated vocal tract. JAcS 36. 1038.Google Scholar
Ohman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances. JAcS 39. 151–169.Google ScholarPubMed
Platt, J. (1964). Strong inference. Science 146: 3642. 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1966). Review of R. M. W. Dixon, Linguistic Science and Logic. Language 43. 84–93.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1933). The psychological reality of phonemes. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press (1949), 46–61. (English original of La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 30. 247–265.)Google Scholar
Saporta, S. (1965). Review of Psychology, Study of a Science; Study II. Edited by Sigmund Koch, Vol. 6. Language. 95–100.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot. (English translation by Wade Baskin, Course in General Linguistics. London: Peter Owen.)Google Scholar