Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:39:20.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specification and English tenses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

David Crystal
David Crystal
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The adverbials, as far as I am aware, have never been systematically considered in relation to English verbal description and definition, most traditional text-books resolving the relationship in terms of a vaguely-defined notional ‘modification’. Scholars have of course noted the existence of regular formal co-occurrences between temporal adverbials and tense-forms, but this has been only for the most obvious cases, and there has been no general, empirical study of all the mutual restrictions and formally definable correlations in English. For example, Jespersen (1933) introduces adverbials into some sections of his description of English tenses (e.g. 23.43) but omits them from others (e.g. 23.41 or 23.54) where one could suggest a comparable relevance, and in many sections (e.g. 23.63–23.67) gives only a partial picture of the total number of possible relationships. Again, Ward (1954:44) notes the frequency of adverbials with ‘past ordinary’ tenses, but gives only a few examples, and then lists ‘exceptions’ with no apparent order. Adverbials with other tense-forms are given little mention, and are in any case given a different orientation, which makes it difficult to compare the sets of information. This approach seems typical of that found in most teaching handbooks on the subject: one could instance Zandvoort (1957: 58–63), who gives adverbials only incidental mention in his description of present, past and perfect tenses, despite the fact that the majority of his examples involve their obligatory use. However, Ota (1963) has studied in more detail correlations between verb forms and certain adverbs of particular semantic classes in English; and Osman (1964: 28–106) has recently given adverb-tense relationship a great deal of prominence in his exposition of English tenses; but the scope of his handbook does not allow a sufficiently detailed treatment to show the full range and complexity of the situation. (Cf. also Hornby, 1954: Part 2.)

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1966 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Close, R. A. (1962). English as a Foreign Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1966). On a unit higher than the sentence in English (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Quirk, R. (1964). Systems of Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features in English. (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 39.) The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. W. (1957). Classification of word groups. Lingua 6. 113–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diver, W. (1963). The chronological system of the English verb. Word 19. 141–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1962). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–55. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Philological Society.Google Scholar
Frei, H. (1956). Caractérisation, Indication, Spécification. In For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, L. (trans. Atkinson, J.). (1961). The Structure and Development of the Finnish Language. The Hague: Mouton & Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hill, A. A. (1958). Introduction to Linguistic Structures. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S. (1954). A Guide to Patterns and Usage in English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ivič, M. (1962). The grammatical category of non-omissible determiners. Lingua, 11. 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for research in English teaching. (1933). Second Interim Report on English Collocations. Tokyo: Dept. of Education.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. (1964). Adverbial Positions in English. Uppsala: Ab Studentbok.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1933). Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kahane, H. R. & Hutter, H. S. (1953). The verbal categories of colloquial Brazilian Portuguese. Word, 9. 16–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, H. R., & Saporta, S. (1953). The verbal categories of Judaeo–Spanish. Hispanic Review 21. 193–214, 322–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, H. & Kahane, R. (1954). Review of L'aspect et le temps dans le verbe néo-grec, H. Seiler. Lg. 30. 115–23.Google Scholar
Kahane, H. and Kahane, R. (1957). The system of the verb in the Western Languages. In Syntactica und Stylistica. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Klum, A. (1961). Verbe et adverbe. Étude sur le système verbal indicatif et sur le système de certains adverbes de temps à la lumière des relations verbo-adverbiales dans la prose du français contemporain. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Osman, N. (1964). Modern English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ota, A. (1963). Tense and aspect of present-day American English. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1965). A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. et al. (1964). Studies in the correspondence of prosodic to grammatical features in English. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, 1962, 679–91. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Scheurweghs, G. (1959). Present-day English syntax. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Spagis, A. A. (1961). Obrazovanie i Upotreblenie Vidov Glagola v Russkom Jazyke. Moskva: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. F. (1960). The English Verb Auxiliaries. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, J. M. (1954). The Use of Tenses in English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Worth, D. S. (1958). Transform analysis of Russian Instrumental constructions. Word 14. 247–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, R. W. (1957). A Handbook of English grammar. London: Longmans.Google Scholar