Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:35:36.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spanning complement-taking verbs and spanning complementizers: On the realization of presuppositional clauses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2022

MIKHAIL KNYAZEV Open the ORCID record for MIKHAIL KNYAZEV [Opens in a new window]
MIKHAIL KNYAZEV*
Affiliation:
Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tuchkov Pereulok 9, Saint Petersburg, Russia HSE University, St. Petersburg, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper presents an account of the (non-)realization of the DP shell in presuppositional clauses within a system where such clauses are uniformly DPs. It is argued that the DP shell is realized by a spanning verb (in languages like Russian) or a spanning complementizer (in languages like English). The analysis is extended to account for the distribution of complementizer drop.

Keywords

presuppositional clausescomplementizer dropDP shellRussianspanning
Type
Squib
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 887 - 899
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank the members of the Laboratory of Formal Models in Linguistics at HSE, as well as three anonymous Journal of Linguistics reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (the research project 075-15-2020-793) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Adger, David. 2014. Variability and grammatical architecture. In Picallo, M. Carme (ed.), Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework, 179–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axel-Tober, Katrin. 2017. The development of the declarative complementizer in German. Language 93.2, 29–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, Itai & Bondarenko, Tatiana. 2020. Composing CPs: evidence from disjunction and conjunction. In Rhyne, Joseph, Lamp, Kaelyn, Dreier, Nicole & Kwon, Chloe (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 583–602.Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena & Lander, Eric. 2018. Deconstructing categories syncretic with the nominal complementizer. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3.1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34.4, 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin & Al Khalaf, Eman. 2020. Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 51.1, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel. 2018. Notes on insertion in distributed morphology and nanosyntax. In Baunaz, Lena, Haegeman, Liliane, Clercq, Karen De & Lander, Eric (eds.), Exploring nanosyntax, 57–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, William & Dubinsky, Stanley. 2009. On the existence (and distribution) of sentential subjects. In Gerdts, Donna B., Moore, John C. & Polinsky, Maria (eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter, 111–128. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Djärv, Kajsa. 2019. Factive and assertive attitude reports. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ürögdi, Barbara. 2010. Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36.2–3, 111–152.Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Mikkelsen, Line. 2021. CP Complements to D. Linguistic Inquiry 52.3, 473–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Jeremy. 2012. Varieties of clausal complementation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael Vincent. 1992. Adjunct extraction and chain configurations. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Rebecca. 2021. Presuppositionality and syntactic nominalization in finite clausal complements In Proceedings of the 39th meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006055 (accessed 30 March 2022).Google Scholar
Kastner, Itamar. 2015. Factivity mirrors interpretation: The selectional requirements of presuppositional verbs. Lingua 164, 156–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khomitsevich, Olga. 2008. Dependencies across Phases: From sequence of tense to restrictions on movement. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Carol & Kiparsky, Paul. 1970. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred & Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2016. Licensing clausal compements: The case of čto-clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Kobozeva, I. M. 2013. Uslovija upotreblenija “to” pered pridatočnym iz”jasnitel’nym s sojuzom “čto” [Conditions for the use of to before explicative clauses with the subordinate conjunction čto]. In Inkova, O. (ed.), Du mot au texte. Études slavo-romanes, 129–148. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Korotaev, N. A. 2016. Sojuz to čto v ustnoj russkoj reči [To čto as a new complementizer in Russian spoken discourse]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 12.1, 101–106.Google Scholar
Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Tatevosov, Sergei. 2019. On the structure of Russian relative clauses. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 75.1, 65–94.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir. 2015. CPs: Copies and compositionality. Linguistic Inquiry 46.2, 305–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2018. Situations and syntactic structures: Rethinking auxiliaries and order in English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle & Hinzen, Wolfram. 2011. Moving towards the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37.3–4, 405–458.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of phrase structure: Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur. 2001. Cyclic domains in syntactic theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. Ms., University of Tromsø. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001501 (accessed 30 March 2022).Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2010. The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28, 343–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar