Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:25:33.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some functionally motivated rules in Tunisian phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Hilary Wise
Hilary Wise
Affiliation:
Queen Mary College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper attempts to account for the existence of two phonological rules (consonant gemination and a type of metathesis) and for the suspension of a third (truncation), all of which occur in very limited grammatical environments. A close examination of these three cases suggests that we must recognize the possibility of phonetically unmotivated morphophonological rules, which can perhaps be explained in functionalist terms: the rules examined here appear to be designed essentially to preserve the canonical forms of sets of morphemes which would otherwise be in danger of clashing with other sets of morphemes in the language. These findings lead us to elaborate on Hooper's (1976) notion of MP-rules (rules which require grammatical information to be given in their structural description), and to question her hypothesis concerning the origins of such rules.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 165 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Lg 49. 765–793.Google Scholar
Baccouche, T. (1969). Description phonologique du parler arabe de Djemmal. Tunis: C.E.R.E.S.Google Scholar
Brame, M. K. (1971). Stress in Arabic and generative phonology. FL 7. 556–591.Google Scholar
Brame, M. K. (1974). The cycle in phonology: stress in Palestinian, Maltese and Spanish. LIn 5. 39–60.Google Scholar
Guerssel, M. (1977). Constraints on phonological rules. LAn 3. 267–305.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. LIn 1. 291–306.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. & Noll, C. (1974). The application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.Google Scholar
Maamouri, M. (1967). The phonology of Tunisian Arabic. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1976). Sequential and simultaneous rule application in Spanish phonology. Lingua 38. 221–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, H. (1972). Concord in spoken Egyptian Arabic. ArchL 3. (New Series). 7–17.Google Scholar