Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:44:39.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sergio Scalise, Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris, 1984. Pp. xii + 237.

Review products

Sergio Scalise, Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris, 1984. Pp. xii + 237.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Jensen
John Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 206 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where's morphology? LIn 13. 571–612.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1977). Dutch morphology: a study of word formation in generative grammar. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham: Ginn & Co. 184–221.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. LIn 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I. -S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1983). Word formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Lawrence, Kansas: University of KansasGoogle Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon, (unpublished doctoral dissertation) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounds in English. LIn 14. 251–285.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Siegel, E. A. M. (1978). A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LIn 9. 199–260.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. (1983). Morfologia lessicale. Padova: CLESP.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. (1977). The adjacency condition and the theory of morphology. Proceedings of NELS VIII, ed. by Mark J. Stein. 189–197.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1981a). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word.’ LIn 12. 245–274.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1981b). Argument structure and morphology. LRev 1. 81–114.Google Scholar