Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:00:29.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The semantics of grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

F. R. Palmer
F. R. Palmer
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 223 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wierzbicka, Anna, The semantics of grammar. (Studies in Language Companion Series, 18). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988. Pp. x + 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt; (1935) London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). Essays on form and interpretation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1971). On generative semantics. In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (1971) (eds.) Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232–296.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1971). Where do noun phrases come from? In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (1971) (eds) Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 217–231.Google Scholar
Nesfield, J. C. (1904). Manual of English grammar and composition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1964). Grammatical categories and their phonetic exponents. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge, Mass., 1962. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English medals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1986). The English verb. 2nd ed.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1952). Noun and verb in universal grammar. Lg 28. 289–298.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1958). The objectives of formal grammar. Indian Linguistics (Turner jubilee volume), vol. 1. 22–30.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1959). Some considerations of the status of grammar in linguistics. Archivum Linguisticum 11. 91–114.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Oats and wheat: the fallacy of arbitrariness. In Haiman, J. (ed.) Iconicity of grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar