Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:35:04.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Geert Booij
Affiliation:
Vakgroep Taalkunde, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berendsen, E. & van den Os, E. (1985). Review of Kaisse (1985). Linguistics 23. 993998.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1983). Principles and parameters in prosodic phonology. Linguistics 21. 249280.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1984). French C/Ø-alternations, extrasyllabicity and Lexical Phonology. The Linguistic Review 3. 181207.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1987). On the relation between Lexical Phonology and Prosodie Phonology. To appear in Bertinetto, P. M. & Loporcaro, M. (eds), Proceedings of the Cartona Phonology Workshop. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. & de Jong, D. (1987). The domain of Liaison. Linguistics 25. 10051025.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. & Rubach, J. (1987). Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. LIn 18. 144.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Ch. F. (1955). A manual of phonology. IJAL Memoir 11. Baltimore: Waverley.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T. (1984). Transitivity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. (1985). Connected speech. The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1982). Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds), The structure of phonological representations. Dordrecht: Foris. 225255.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983). Relating to the grid. LIn 14. 19100.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1978). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Published in Fretheim, T. (ed.), Nordic prosody II. Trondheim: Tapir, 1981. 111140.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1980a). Prosodie domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Aronoff, M. & Kean, M.-L. (eds), Juncture. Saratoga, Calif.: Anma Libri. 107129.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1980b). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. LIn 11. 563605.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar