No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds.), Rethinking verb second (Rethinking Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. xxii + 956.
Review products
Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds.), Rethinking verb second (Rethinking Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. xxii + 956.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
REFERENCES
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2020. The head of the nominal is N, not D: N-to-D movement, hybrid agreement, and conventionalized expressions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2015. Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative analysis of languages with articles. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 465–497.Google Scholar
Hsu, Brian. Coalescence: A unification of bundling operations in syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00372. Published online by MIT Press, 4 November 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar