No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Puglielli Annarita, Strutture sintattiche del predicato in italiano. (Biblioteca di filologia romanza, 15). Bari: Adriatica editrice, 1970. Pp. 174. - G. Lepschy et al., Scritti e ricerche di grammatica italiana. Trieste: Lint, 1972. Pp. 334.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974
References
REFERENCES
Akmanjan, A. (1970). On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences. Lin 1. 149–168.Google Scholar
Alinei, M. (1971). Il tipo sintagmatico quel matto di Giorgio. In La grammatica transformazionale italiana. Rome: Bulzoni. 1–12.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. (1966). Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. Studia Grammatica 7. 99–201.Google Scholar
Cîrstea, M. (1971). La descrizione dell'italiano in rapporto alla didattica. Qualche osservazione sulla particella ne. In L'insegnamento dell'italiano all'estero. Rome: Bulzoni. 289–300.Google Scholar
Costabile, N. (1967). Le strutture della lingua italiana: grammatico generativo-transformativa. Bologna: Pátron.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1–90.Google Scholar
Harries, H. (1973). A note on double negation and modals as main verbs. Working papers on language universals 11. 211–217.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Todd, W. (ed.), Philosophical linguistics, Series I. Evanston: Great Expectations.Google Scholar
Warren, D. (1971). Review of Puglielli, Strutture sintattiche del predicato in italiano. Papers in linguistics 4. 395–404.Google Scholar