Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:59:18.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prepositional phrases as subjects and objects1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ewa Jaworska
Ewa Jaworska
Affiliation:
St Hugh's College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The positions of subject and object in simple active sentences, and object of a preposition are normally filled by NP's but they can also be filled by PP's. There are reasons for analyzing such PP's as just PP's and not as PP's embedded in NP's. Yet such an analysis appears to be problematic for the analysis of raising and passive sentences assumed within the government-binding (GB) framework, which is formulated with exclusive reference to NP's. Assuming that the basic mechanisms at work in sentences with PP's in typical NP positions are identical to those in sentences with NP's, PP's must sometimes require Case to avoid a violation of the Case Filter. It is possible to incorporate this idea into the GB framework given a particular view of Case and Case assignment, and a revised Case Filter. The analysis receives some further support from a range of related data.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 1986 , pp. 355 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borsley, R. D. (1985). A note on passives in GPSG. To appear in York Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cann, R. (1983). Raising in Latin: a phrase structure analysis of the accusative and infinitive. In Gazdar, G., Klein, E. & Pullum, G. K. (eds), Order, concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris. 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chametzky, R. (1985). NPs or arguments: exocentricity vs. predication. CLS 21. 26–39.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. E. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K. & Sag, I. A. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. (1985). A nonsolution for the problem of PP extraction. Lin 16. 478–481.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1973). The base rules for prepositional phrases. In Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 345–356.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1927). A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part III. Syntax, 2nd vol. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1982). Whither move NP? In Marantz, A. & Stowell, T. (eds), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 4. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. 123–162.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1981). Transformational syntax: a student's guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. F. (1984). Let X¯ = X¯. CLS 20. 321–333.Google Scholar
Safir, K. (1983). On small clauses as constituents. Lin 14. 730–735.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A. (1982). Coordination, extraction, and generalized phrase structure grammar. Lin 13. 329–336.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. A. (1981). The origins of phrase structure. Unpublished dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1979). Passive. Unpublished paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1984). Grammatical relations. LIn 15. 639–673.Google Scholar