Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:11:19.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polish yers: Representation and analysis1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

JERZY RUBACH
JERZY RUBACH*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa & University of Warsaw
*
Author’s address: Instytut Anglistyki, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Hoża 69, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a new analysis of yers in Polish and addresses the issue of how yers should be represented. Reviving the debate started by Kiparsky (1973), the article argues that diacritic use of phonological features is superior to phonological use of diacritic features. Since diacritic representation of yers misses generalizations, yers are better represented as floating melodic segments (Rubach 1986, Kenstowicz & Rubach 1987). The patterns of Yer Vocalization and Yer Deletion are derived without recourse to syllable structure constraints such as *COMPLEX-Coda. Yer Deletion applies at an earlier level than Yer Vocalization and is enforced by a distribution-based constraint. Yer Vocalization, on the other hand, is a context-free process that is driven by the need to parse segments in output representations.

Keywords

abstractnessOptimality TheoryPolish phonologySlavic phonologyyers
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , 01 July 2016 , pp. 421 - 466
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 1999. Constraint interaction in language change: Quantity in English and Germanic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. Forthcoming. Stratal Optimality Theory (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bethin, Christina Y. 1992. Polish syllables: The role of prosody in phonology and morphology. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E. & Rubach, Jerzy. 1984. Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E. & Rubach, Jerzy. 1987. Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 1–44.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel J.. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2005. Sound patterns of Polish: Phonotactics paradoxes at the right edge of words. Studies in Polish Linguistics 2, 61–89.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2010. Complexity scales and licensing in phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 1988. Investigations into Polish morphology and phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dłuska, Maria. 1974. Prozodia języka polskiego [Polish prosody]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Dvonč, Ladislav & Ružicka, Jozef. 1966. Morfólogia slovenského jazyka [Slovak morphology]. Bratislava: Vydavatel’stvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
Gorecka, Alicja. 1988. Epenthesis and the coda constraints in Polish. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria. 2012. Unexceptional segments. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 30, 79–133.Google Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund. 1980. Studies in abstract phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in morac phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–305.Google Scholar
Jarosz, Gaja. 2005. Polish yers and the finer structure of output–output correspondence. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS) 31, 181–192.Google Scholar
Jarosz, Gaja. 2008. Partial ranking and alternating vowels in Polish. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 41, 193–206.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig & Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Rubach, Jerzy. 1987. The phonology of syllabic nuclei in Slovak. Language 63, 463–497.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. How abstract is phonology?In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.), Three dimensions in phonological theory, 5–56. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From Cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological represesentations, vol. I, 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. LP and OT. Handout. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistic Institute.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17, 351–365.Google Scholar
Laskowski, Roman. 1975. Studia nad morfonologią współczesnego języka polskiego [Studies in morphophonology of contemporary standard Polish]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. 1963. Preliminary remarks on the morphophonemic component of Polish. Quarterly Progress Report 71, 220–235. [MIT]Google Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M.1965. Segmental phonology of Modern Standard Russian. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. 1972. Problems in the theory of phonology. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 43, 84–108.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16, 331–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura W. & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 249–384.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, Marek, Roca, Iggy & Spencer, Andy. 1992. Polish yers and lexical syllabicity. The Linguistic Review 9, 27–67.Google Scholar
Rowicka, Grażyna. 1999. On ghost vowels: A strict CV approach. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1984. Cyclic and Lexical Phonology: The structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1986. Abstract vowels in three-dimensional phonology: The yers. The Linguistic Review 5, 247–280.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1993. The lexical phonology of Slovak. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1997. Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory. In Roca, Iggy (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 551–581. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2000a. Glide and glottal stop insertion: A DOT analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 271–317.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2000b. Backness switch in Russian. Phonology 17, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003a. Polish Palatalization in Derivational Optimality Theory. Lingua 113, 197–237.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003b. Duke-of-York derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 601–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2008. Prevocalic faithfulness. Phonology 25, 433–468.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2011. Syllabic repairs in Macedonian. Lingua 121, 237–268.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2013. Exceptional segments in Polish. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 31, 1139–1162.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert E.. 1985. A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66, 281–319.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert E.. 1990a. Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7, 121–158.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert E.. 1990b. Edge of constituent effects in Polish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8, 427–463.Google Scholar
Ruszkiewicz, Piotr. 1989. Constraining the rule of Lower in Polish. Folia Linguistica 23, 317–326.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2011. Slavic yers. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), Companion to phonology, 2936–2962. Oxford & Boston, MA: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1982. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure, 107–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1986. A non-linear analysis of vowel–zero alternations in Polish. Journal of Linguistics 22, 249–280.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre. 2012. A diachronic account of phonological unnaturalness. Phonology 29, 505–531.Google Scholar
Steele, Richard D.1973. The segmental phonology of Contemporary Standard Polish. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard Unviversity.Google Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta. 1989. The phonology–morphology interface: Cycles, levels, and words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta. 1992. Ghost segments in non-linear phonology: Polish yers. Language 68, 277–312.Google Scholar
Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1963. Budowa akustyczna a artykulacyjna dźwięków mowy. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 22, 3–23.Google Scholar
Yearley, Jennifer. 1995. Jer vowels in Russian. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura W. & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 533–571.Google Scholar
Zauner, A. 1966. Praktická príručka slovenského pravopisu [Practical handbook of Slovak orthography]. Bratislava: Obzor.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva. 2013. Vowel deletion as mora usurpation: The case of Yine. Phonology 30, 125–163.Google Scholar