Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T06:04:57.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phrase structure principles of English complex sentence formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter S. Rosenbaum
Peter S. Rosenbaum
Affiliation:
International Business Machines Corporation, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this study is to show that the theory of English syntax contains at least two phrase structure rules (cf. Chomsky, 1956, 1961) which introduce sentences. The first of these exemplifies the principle of NOUN PHRASE COMPLEMENTATION by which a sentence is introduced under the immediate domination of a noun phrase (NP). The second is VERB PHRASE COMPLEMENTATION, involving the introduction of a sentence under the immediate domination of a verb phrase (VP). These rules, couched in a workable phrase structure context, will be postulated at the outset. (For a more complete phrase structure component incorporating the principles of noun phrase and verb phrase complementation, cf. Rosenbaum & Lochak, 1966.) It will then be shown (i) that these rules follow as a consequence of syntactic theory previously formulated and independently justified and (ii) that the incorporation of these rules into the grammar of English leads to a compelling account of a wide range of English complex sentence phenomena.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 1967 , pp. 103 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-2. (Reprinted in Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E., eds., Readings in Mathematical Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 105–124. New York: Wiley, 1956.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1961). On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics 6–24 (edited by Jakobson, Roman). Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. (Reprinted in J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz, eds., The Structure of Language, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. (Research Monographs, 26.) Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1965). On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. (Report No. NSF-16, Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Computational Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. & Klima, E. S. (1963). Rules for English pronominalization. Lg. 39. 17–28.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1965). The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. (M.I.T. Ph.D. dissertation.)Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1966). A principle governing deletion in English sentential complementation. IBM Research Report RC 1519. Yorktown Heights, N.Y.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967 a). The empirical bases of the cyclic principle. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967 b). Grammar II. (To appear as an IBM Research Report.)Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. & Lochak, D. (1966). The IBM core grammar of English. In Specification and Utilization of a Transformational Grammar. (Scientific Report No. 1, Contract AF 19(628)–5127.)Google Scholar
Ross, John R. (1967). M.I.T. Ph.D dissertation. (In preparation.)Google Scholar