Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T17:36:13.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

P. H. Matthews, Inflectional morphology: a theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation, (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 6.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972. Pp. x + 431.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

William R. Merrifield
William R. Merrifield
Affiliation:
Instituto Lingüistico de Verano, Mitla, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , September 1974 , pp. 349 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Haas, W. (1957). Zero in linguistic description. In Studies in linguistic analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 33–53.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr (1972). The place of rules in linguistic analysis. In Smith, E. (ed.), Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager. The Hague: Mouton. 41–43.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1961). Linguistic elements and their relations. Lg 35. 29–53.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1965a). The inflectional component of a word-and-paradigm grammar. JL 1. 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1965b). Some concepts in word-and-paradigm morphology. FL 1. 268–89.Google Scholar
Peters, S. (1972). The projection problem: How is a grammar to be selected? In Peters, S. (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 171–87.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1959). Language as particle, wave, and field. The Texas Quarterly 2. 237–54.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1962). Dimensions of grammatical constructions. Lg 38. 221–44.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1967). Grammar as wave. MSLL 20. 1–14.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. & Lowe, I. (1969). Pronominal reference in English conversation and discourse: a group theoretical treatment. FoL 3. 68–106.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1972). The best theory. In Peters (ed.) Goals of linguistic theory. 131–70.Google Scholar