We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1994. Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Halle, Morris. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Geerts, Twan & Jacobs, Haike (eds.), Going Romance 2003, 59–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 1999. Locality in post-syntactic operations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics34, 265–317.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. On stress and accent in Indo-European. Language73, 275–313.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language78, 482–526.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William. 1992. The composition of prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Radkevich, Nina. 2010. On location: The structure of case and adpositions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochem. 1999. Morphology consuming syntax's resources: Generation and parsing in a Minimalist version of Distributed Morphology. In Retoré, Christian & Stabler, Edward (eds.), ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars. Utrecht: Association for Logic, Language, and Information.Google Scholar