Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:08:57.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Wolfgang U. Dressler
Wolfgang U. Dressler
Affiliation:
Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Wien
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Natural Morphology as represented in the forthcoming volume by Dressler, Mayerthaler, Panagl & Wurzel (1985) came into being about 1977 as an attempt to create a counter-part to Stampean Natural Phonology and to develop and systematize Jakobsonian reflections on morphological universals. In this paper I will present and exemplify some ideas and findings of Natural Morphology, of course from my own specific point of view.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 321 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anttila, R. (1975a). The indexical element in morphology. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Vorträge 12.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1975b). The metamorphosis of allomorphs. Lacus 2. 238–249.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1983). Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency. (Tokyo) PICL 13. 163–171.Google Scholar
Cappello, T. & Tagliavini, C. (1981). Dizionario degli etnici e dei toponimi italiani. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1969). Sistema, norma e ‘parola’. Festschrift V. Pisani. Brescia, Paideia. 235–253.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. (1977). Elements of a polycentristic theory of word formation. Wiener linguistische Gazette 15. 15–32.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1981). General principles of poetic license in word formation. In Weydt, E. (ed.). Logos Semantikos. Festschrift E. Coseriu II. Berlin: de Gruyter. 423–431.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1982a). On word formation in Natural Morphology. Wiener linguistische Gazette 26. 3–14. (cf. PICL (Tokyo) 13. 172–182.)Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1982b). Zur semiotischen Begründung einer natürlichen Wortbildungslehre. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 8. 72–87.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1984). Subtraction in word formation and its place within a theory of Natural Morphology. Quaderni di Semantica 5. 78–85.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985a). Morphonology. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985b). Explaining natural phonology. Phonology Yearbook. 1. 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985c). Subtraction in a polycentristic theory of Natural Morphology. In Gussman, E. (ed.). Rules and the lexicon. Studies in word-formation Lublin: Catholic University. (In press.)Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985d). Suppletion in word-formation. Papers from the Symposium on Diachronic Word Formation. In Fisiak, J. (ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985e). Inflectional suppletion in Natural Morphology. In Elson, B. (ed.) Summer Institute of Linguistics 50th Anniversary Volume.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985f). Zur Wertung der Interfixe in einer semiotischen Theorie der Natürlichen Morphologie. Festschrift G. Hüttl-Folter. Wiener Slavistischer Almanach.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1986). Studies in Natural Morphology. Tübingen: Narr. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Dressler, W. & Acson, V. (1985). On the diachrony of subtractive operations: evidence for semiotically based models of Natural Phonology and Natural Morphology from Northern and Anatolian Greek dialects. In Fisiak, J. (ed.). Proceedings of the VIth Intern. Congress of Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 105–127.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O. & Wurzel, W. (1985). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (In press.)Google Scholar
Dressler, W., Schaner-Wolles, Ch. & Grossmann, W. (1985). On the acquisition of morphology in normal children and children with Down's syndrome. Studia grammatyczne. (In press.)Google Scholar
Dressler, W. & Stark, J. (1986). Linguistic studies in aphasia. New York: Academic Press. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Forchheimer, P. (1953). The category of person in language. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. (1984). Natural Morphology and Classical vs. Tunisian Arabic. Wiener linguistische Gazette 33–34. 51–68.Google Scholar
Koj, L. (1979). The principle of transparency and semiotic antinomies. In Pelc, J. (ed.). Semiotics in Poland. Dordrecht: Reidel. 376–406.Google Scholar
Lopatin, V. V. (1975). Tak nazyvaemaja interfiksacija i problemy struktury slova v russkom jazyke. VJa 1975/4, 24–37.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1978). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. JVLVB 17. 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1958). Los interfijos hispánicos. In Miscelánea homenaje a A. Martinet II. Madrid: Gredos. 107–199.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1966). Genetic analysis of word-formation. In Current Trends in Linguistics 3. 305–364.Google Scholar
Mańczak, W. (1966). La nature du supplétivisme. Linguistics 28. 82–89.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1981). Do languages obey general laws? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. (1977). Studien zur theoretischen und französischen Morphologie. Tübingen. Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. (1980). Morphologischer Ikonismus. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 2. 19–37.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Mel'čuk, I. (1976a). On suppletion. Linguistics 170. 45–90.Google Scholar
Nida, E. (1961). Morphology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Osthoff, H. (1899). Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Hörning.Google Scholar
Panagl, O. (1977). Aspekte der kindersprachlichen Wortbildung. In Salzburger Beiträge zur Lingusitik IV. 79–101.Google Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S. (1965). Collected papers. Hartshorne, Ch. & Weiss, P. (eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pennanen, E. (1980). Observations on word-formation and syntax. LAUT.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1981). Morphologische (Ir-)Regularitäten. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Rudes, B. A. (1980). On the nature of verbal suppletion. Linguistics 18. 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarze, Ch. (1970). Suppletion und Alternanz im Französischen. Ling. Berichte 6. 21–34.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. (1967). Concatenators and Russian derivational morphology. General Linguistics 7. 50–66.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. (1963). The sense of grammar. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Skalička, V. (1979). Typologische Studien. Braunschweig: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1981). Consistency, markedness and language change: on the notion ‘consistent language’. JL 17. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. (1969). Das ABC der modernen Logik und Semantik. Der Begriff der Erklärung und seiner Spielarten. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W. (1979). Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie II. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In Vennemann, T. & Wilbur, T. H. (eds). Schuchardt, the neogrammarians and the transformational theory of language change. Frankfurt: Athenäum. 181–204.Google Scholar
Werner, O. (1977). Suppletivwesen durch Lautwandel. Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik 3. 269–283.Google Scholar
Winter, W. (1966). Vocative and imperative. In Puhvel, J. (ed.). Substance and structure of language. Berkeley: University of California Press. 205–223.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1977). Zur Stellung der Morphologie im Sprachsystem. In Linguistische Studien A35 (Arbeitsberichte). 130–135.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1980). Some remarks in the relations between naturalness and typology. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 20. 103–113.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1981). Problems in morphonology. Phonologica 1980. 413–434.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Studia Grammatica 21.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1978). On markedness in morphology. Sprache 14. 129–143.Google Scholar