Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:20:25.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the interpretation of ‘deviant utterances’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ronald R. Butters
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bar-Hillel, Y. (1967). Review of Fodor & Kate (1964). Lg. 43. 526550.Google Scholar
Butters, R. R. (1967). Linguistic Deviance and Linguistic Competence. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1969). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J., eds. (1964). The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1969). On the interpretation of ‘nonsense strings’. JL 5. 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1964). Semi-sentences. In Fodor & Katz (1964: 400–416).Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Relatedness between grammatical systems. Lg. 40. 120.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The role of semantics in a grammar. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. (1969). Metaphor and Related Subjects. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ziff, P. (1964). On understanding ‘Understanding utterances’. In Fodor & Katz (1964: 390–399).Google Scholar