Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:14:25.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the functional diversity of phonological rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

R. W. P. Brasington
R. W. P. Brasington
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The primary aim of this paper is to show by the analysis of an extended example that a phonological description which recognizes the functional variety of phonological description which recognizes the functional variety of phonological rules is more illuminating than one in which the data are handled merely as the output of a set of completely undifferentiated processes. In particular I hope to emphasize the value of distinguishing MOTIVATED and UNMOTIVATED processes in phonology.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 125 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Alarcos Llorach, E. (1953). Sisterna fonemático del Catalán. Archivurn (Oviedo) 3. 135–146.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1974). On the typology of phonological rules, Papers from the parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 1–12.Google Scholar
Brasington, R. (1973). Reciprocal rules in Catalan phonology. JL 9. 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, R. (1974). On the phonological interpretation of Catalan sibilants. Archl. 11–24.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1972). Phonological rules and dialect variation: a study of the phonology of Lumasaaba. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1973). Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1973). Yokuts as a testing-ground for linguistic methods. IJAL 39. 63–79.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1974). Rule morphologization in natural generative phonology. Papers from the parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 160–170.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Unpublished MS. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. W. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. Lin I. 290–306.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. & Noll, C. (1974). The application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (1970) Problems of Catalan phonology. (Studies in linguistics and language learning 8.) Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1965). De la morphonologie. Linguistique I. 15–30.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1968). Neutralisation et syncrétisme. Linguistique I. 1–20.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1968). Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. (1972). On arguments for rule ordering. FL 8. 266–273.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1973) The role of surface phonetic constraints in generative phonology. Lg 49. 87–106.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1978). Chinook jargon: language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems, I. Lg 48, 378–406.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1974). On phonotactically motivated rules. JL 10. 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, R. (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg 43. 393–436.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939) Grundzüge der Phonologic (TCLP 7) tr. Cantineau, J. (1949). Principes de phonologiee. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Wells, R. S. (1949) Automatic alternation. Lg 25. 99–116.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1974). When is a phonological rule not a phonological rule? The morphology of Sierra Miwok. Papers from the parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 385–395.Google Scholar