Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:37:07.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On some claims of Atomic Phonology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Max W. Wheeler
Affiliation:
School of Modern Languages, University of Liverpool

Extract

Atomic Phonology is a theory constraining phonological rules and phonological components of grammars which has been developed largely by Daniel Dinnsen in a number of papers since 1978. The basic principles of Atomic Phonology are set out in the following quotation:

(1) The theory of atomic phonology maintains that all linguistic variation requiring distinctly varied formulations of phonological rules is predictable from a set of atomic rules and universal principles of grammar… Atomic rules are entirely independent rules of grammar which are presumed to be the most basic, most specific rules that can be motivated on empirical grounds… Atomic rules thus specify all the necessary initial conditions from which any correct variation on that process for any natural language can be predicted by universal principles. Non-atomic rules are dependent on atomic rules. The dependence on atomic rules derives from the requirement that non-atomic rules are all and only those rules which are complements of atomic rules or complements of their complements. The complement relation may be defined as follows: Two rules are complements… if just those commonly shared (identical) features in the structural descriptions of the two rules are sufficient to define precisely the same set of input relations defined by the two rules jointly (Dinnsen; 1979: 31).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1978). Some formal and empirical issues in Atomic Phonology. Communication and Cognition 11. 427440. Also in Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.), Recent advances in phonological theory. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 1979. 143–156; and in Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.), Phonology in the 1980's. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 1981. 603–615.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1979). Atomic Phonology. In Dinnsen, D. A. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 3149.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1980). Phonological rules and phonetic explanation. JL 16. 171191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. & Eckman, F. R. (1978). Some substantive universals in Atomic Phonology. Lingua 45. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keel, W. D. (1982). Atomic phonology and phonological variation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. W. (1972). Distinctive features and natural classes in phonological theory. JL 8. 87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. W. (1983). Catalan in recent phonological theory. Actes del III Col.loqui d'Estudis Catalans a Nord-Amèrica. Toronto 1982. Montserrat: Publicacions de l'Abadia. 5366.Google Scholar