Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:36:10.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On implicational and distributional universals of word order1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John A. Hawkins
John A. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper argues that the theory of Universal Grammar must include both implicational universals and universals of language distribution in the description and explanation of word order.

Implicational universals are of the form: if a language has some property (or properties) P, then it will also have some property (or properties) Q. These ‘if P then Q’ statements require that a language must not have property P without property Q (*P –O).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , September 1980 , pp. 193 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Givon, T. (1975). Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In Li, C. N. (ed.), 49–112.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 73–113.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1978). Theoretically significant word order patterns in Greenberg's Appendix II. In University of Essex Department of Language and Linguistics Occasional Papers No. 20: Universal Grammar, 87–150.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1979). Implicational universals as predictors of word order change. Lg 55, 618–648.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). Xsyntax: a study of phrase structure. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 2.) Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1972). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Paper presented at the Winter meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. LIn 8. 63–99.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. (ed.) (1975). Word order and word order change. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. (1975). The semantic function of word order: a case study in Mandarin. In Li, C. N. (ed.), 163–195.Google Scholar
Steele, S. (1975). On some factors that affect and effect word order. In Li, C. N. (ed.), 197–268.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. Paper read at the 11th International Congress of Linguists, Bologna.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974a). Topics, subjects and word order: from SXV to SVX via TVX. In Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds) Historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 339–376.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974b). Theoretical word order studies: results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistsk 7. 5–25.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1975) An explanation of drift. In Li, C. N. (ed.), 269–305.Google Scholar